Mar 10, 2026 09:25 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 10, 2026 09:26 PM by C C.)
From the standpoint that "hallucination" already entails manifestation or is a type of manifestation itself -- it would be circular, and in itself would not explain the latter or its association with certain matter organizations and interactions.
- - - - - - -
Reality is not a controlled hallucination
https://iai.tv/articles/reality-is-not-a..._auid=2020
INTRO: The idea that 'reality is a controlled hallucination' has been recently popularised by figures such as neuroscientist Anil Seth. But this claim, which purports to be hard, down-to-earth science, is, in fact, bad philosophy. Philosopher and author of The Blind Spot: Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience, Evan Thompson, here argues the 'controlled hallucination' hypothesis brings nothing new to the table regarding the problem of consciousness. And there is a circularity problem: if the theory claims that reality is a hallucination, then that theory itself is part of the hallucination... (MORE - details)
- - - - - - -
Reality is not a controlled hallucination
https://iai.tv/articles/reality-is-not-a..._auid=2020
INTRO: The idea that 'reality is a controlled hallucination' has been recently popularised by figures such as neuroscientist Anil Seth. But this claim, which purports to be hard, down-to-earth science, is, in fact, bad philosophy. Philosopher and author of The Blind Spot: Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience, Evan Thompson, here argues the 'controlled hallucination' hypothesis brings nothing new to the table regarding the problem of consciousness. And there is a circularity problem: if the theory claims that reality is a hallucination, then that theory itself is part of the hallucination... (MORE - details)
