Ghost captured on home security camera inside home

How do you know there's a solid wall there? The camera doesn't show it. Oh right, on faith.
Unless it's a very oddly shaped house, there is likely a room there. How do you think you get to it? From the outside?

I see feet, intermittently obscured by poor quality video artifacts... just like every other detail in the video. Same with your supposed "dissolve."
Do you even understand the simple fact of video artifacts?

The hallway comes to end and there are doorways there to other rooms. That's how you get to the room behind the wall. And no, there are no feet there. Her whole form is spectral and wispy in nature, nothing like a solid body. And cameras don't make people look like they're dissolving into walls. Are you still claiming she's an intruder? How did she get into the house?

Yes, a doorway the figure walk into. That's the room behind the wall.
Or are you claiming you have to go through a doorway on the right to somehow reach the room to the immediate left of the hall?

Poor quality video artifacts, especially in low light, do all kinds of things to moving figures. You're obviously completely ignorant of simple video artifacts.

Quote:Yes, a doorway the figure walk into. That's the room behind the wall.

At the end of the hall. Not in the wall she is seen to be dissolving into.

Quote:Poor quality video artifacts, especially in low light, do all kinds of things to moving figures. You're obviously completely ignorant of simple video artifacts.

They more often accurately capture figures moving discretely than making them look whispey like a ghost. I watch alot of CCTV night videos of apparitions. I know the difference.

At the end of the hall? Behind the table?

Or at the end of the hall to the left... exactly where the figure takes a couple of steps toward before turning left out of sight? You know, through that doorway.

Apparently you don't know the difference, as the video artifacts here are also affecting the background, and moving objects are more distorted by video artifacts.

Phony: describes a situation where there's a lack of authenticity and a deliberate attempt to deceive or mislead.

That would make the proponent of such a what?

Anyways, not like MR hasn’t lashed out at skeptics in an ungentlemanly manner.

(May 11, 2025 12:21 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Anyways, not like MR hasn’t lashed out at skeptics in an ungentlemanly manner.

Too true.

(May 11, 2025 01:05 PM)Syne Wrote:

(May 11, 2025 12:21 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Anyways, not like MR hasn’t lashed out at skeptics in an ungentlemanly manner.

Too true.

Show a skeptic irrefutable proof of something and they'll stop being skeptical about it. So far I estimate MR is 0 for e erything he's put forward as a proof.

Hey Syne....remember the highway lights shining thru the fog being compelling evidence of UFOs fiasco? Well they've installed same lights near us here and when I drive by them I often think of MR...Lol

(May 10, 2025 10:38 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [...] Certainly not anyone who SHOULD be in that house. [...] https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=222539496883620

If looking at it frame by frame, the figure seems to hesitate a bit before first stepping out, as if peering to make sure no one is around. And then walks in an almost tiptoe-like fashion, as if still worried about being discovered.

I'm not sure where the assumption that she is an elderly woman comes from specifically, though maybe her cautious gait could be interpreted as old-age awkwardness and frailty. I suppose there's also the optimistic initial tendency to assume that an intruder could have wandered off from a senior nursing care facility, caught in the scrambled memory-fog of dementia, and entered a home that perhaps resembled a place they had lived at in the past.

But the camera monitoring suggests that the residence is well-equipped with an alarm system, so how a bewildered "somebody's granny" manages to get in far enough to prowl about indoors surreptitiously apparently requires the front or back door to be negligently left wide open or the warning system to be inadvertently switched off.

EDIT: I forgot about the dog barking, which is what that couple actually seems to depend upon as their alert device. If there was anything more to the home's security system than the camera(s), then it just wasn't working. And one of the entrances was indeed left unlocked, if no window or door damage (as if an "elderly woman" wearing nighty apparel and carrying no tools could have otherwise broken in).

(May 11, 2025 03:38 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Show a skeptic irrefutable proof of something and they'll stop being skeptical about it. So far I estimate MR is 0 for e erything he's put forward as a proof.

I think he's a true believer. I wouldn't give him enough credit to con anyone.

Quote:Hey Syne....remember the highway lights shining thru the fog being compelling evidence of UFOs fiasco? Well they've installed same lights near us here and when I drive by them I often think of MR...Lol

Yep. I also remember the Chinese lantern embarrassment.
Never could shake his blind faith on the Mylar balloon though.