Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thirty Years On, How Well Do Global Warming Predictions Stand Up?

#1
Syne Offline
https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-year...1529623442

...
Mr. Hansen’s testimony described three possible scenarios for the future of carbon dioxide emissions. He called Scenario A “business as usual,” as it maintained the accelerating emissions growth typical of the 1970s and ’80s. This scenario predicted the earth would warm 1 degree Celsius by 2018. Scenario B set emissions lower, rising at the same rate today as in 1988. Mr. Hansen called this outcome the “most plausible,” and predicted it would lead to about 0.7 degree of warming by this year. He added a final projection, Scenario C, which he deemed highly unlikely: constant emissions beginning in 2000. In that forecast, temperatures would rise a few tenths of a degree before flatlining after 2000.

Thirty years of data have been collected since Mr. Hansen outlined his scenarios—enough to determine which was closest to reality. And the winner is Scenario C. Global surface temperature has not increased significantly since 2000, discounting the larger-than-usual El Niño of 2015-16. Assessed by Mr. Hansen’s model, surface temperatures are behaving as if we had capped 18 years ago the carbon-dioxide emissions responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect. But we didn’t. And it isn’t just Mr. Hansen who got it wrong. Models devised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have, on average, predicted about twice as much warming as has been observed since global satellite temperature monitoring began 40 years ago.

What about Mr. Hansen’s other claims? Outside the warming models, his only explicit claim in the testimony was that the late ’80s and ’90s would see “greater than average warming in the southeast U.S. and the Midwest.” No such spike has been measured in these regions.
...
Several more of Mr. Hansen’s predictions can now be judged by history. Have hurricanes gotten stronger, as Mr. Hansen predicted in a 2016 study? No. Satellite data from 1970 onward shows no evidence of this in relation to global surface temperature. Have storms caused increasing amounts of damage in the U.S.? Data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show no such increase in damage, measured as a percentage of gross domestic product. How about stronger tornadoes? The opposite may be true, as NOAA data offers some evidence of a decline. The list of what didn’t happen is long and tedious.
...
The problem with Mr. Hansen’s models—and the U.N.’s—is that they don’t consider more-precise measures of how aerosol emissions counter warming caused by greenhouse gases. Several newer climate models account for this trend and routinely project about half the warming predicted by U.N. models, placing their numbers much closer to observed temperatures. The most recent of these was published in April by Nic Lewis and Judith Curry in the Journal of Climate, a reliably mainstream journal.

These corrected climate predictions raise a crucial question: Why should people world-wide pay drastic costs to cut emissions when the global temperature is acting as if those cuts have already been made?

Reply
#2
Zinjanthropos Offline
So if you trusted the science 30 years ago, would you trust it again? Seems like a familiar refrain, how many times have I done so.....trusting the science. I've flip flop more than an iHop pancake over the years, always going with the science. Is it because it's usually wrong or because I understand knowledge grows each passing day? Wink
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
The problem isn't that science advances. The problem is that people get dogmatic about the old science and refuse to view new data and models.
Reply
#4
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jul 26, 2018 10:39 PM)Syne Wrote: The problem isn't that science advances. The problem is that people get dogmatic about the old science and refuse to view new data and models.

You said it better than I did.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Passing star may have altered Earth's orbit, triggering global warming 56 mil yrs ago C C 0 36 Feb 19, 2024 06:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Rapid warming in the Gulf of Maine reverses 900 years of cooling C C 1 130 Aug 9, 2022 10:57 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Antarctic research links warming to fish decline C C 0 58 Feb 9, 2022 02:12 AM
Last Post: C C
  The warming climate is causing animals to 'shapeshift' C C 0 83 Sep 27, 2021 05:53 PM
Last Post: C C
  Solar geoengineering may be effective alleviating impacts of global warming on crops C C 0 239 May 22, 2021 10:17 PM
Last Post: C C
  As our planet gets greener, plants are slowing global warming C C 10 753 Feb 6, 2020 11:56 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Oceans not warming faster Syne 10 1,123 Nov 17, 2018 08:23 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Global Warming My Ass! Yazata 3 725 Nov 19, 2016 10:20 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Climate change & better wine + Alarmist admits real motive behind warming scare C C 0 525 Apr 17, 2016 02:11 AM
Last Post: C C
  'Super Corals' Could Survive Warming Oceans C C 0 540 Nov 30, 2015 09:00 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)