(Nov 6, 2017 09:29 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Easier to Prove an Evil God?
No, I don't think so. I don't think that it's easy (or even possible) to "prove" the existence of any sort of God. 'Prove' usually suggests apodeictic certainty (logical necessity) and is more appropriate in logic or mathematics.
We live in a world that we perceive as containing both good and evil. (I'm not certain that good and evil have objective existence.) That's just how things are.
Some people kind of imagine good as concentrated to the utmost degree, purified of anything bad. Then they personify that image and call it 'God'.
I suppose that it's possible to do the same thing with evil too. A number of dualistic theologies have, when they imagine 'the Antagonist': Satan or Ahriman. Zoroastrianism (or one variety of it at least) was famous for that, imagining this world as a place of battle between the gods of good and evil. It's our choice which deity we align with.
I agree fully that the 'problem of evil' creates severe consistency difficulties for some varieties of theology that imagine God as both absolutely good and simultaneously entirely omnipotent.
Of course, if we believed in an absolutely evil God, then good would create a corresponding 'problem of good'.
I think that the omni- predicates create other logical difficulties as well, such as the problem of whether God could create a task too difficult for God to accomplish. Both the 'yes' and a 'no' answer seem to imply that God can't be omnipotent. (It seems to me that it's the omnipotence predicate that's creating most of the difficulties.)
But noting that isn't any help in proving the existence of either a good or a bad God.