Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Oooo...so hateful..lol

Methinks you're confusing socialism with statism.

Where's your argument? @_@

You don't even know what socialism is do you? Why don't you ask your LLM?

(Jun 21, 2026 03:15 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]You don't even know what socialism is do you? Why don't you ask your LLM?

I know that all socialism resorts to statism. Apparently, you don't, otherwise you'd have some/any argument. Instead, you can only hide behind your ignorant genetic fallacy... even when no LLM is cited.

9_9

Quote:I know that all socialism resorts to statism.

Dumbass:


Google AI

"Many socialist philosophies, such as libertarian socialism and anarcho-syndicalism, actively oppose the state. These models advocate for decentralized economic control directly by the workers or community rather than through a centralized government."

(Jun 21, 2026 05:16 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I know that all socialism resorts to statism.

Dumbass:


Google AI

"Many socialist philosophies, such as libertarian socialism and anarcho-syndicalism, actively oppose the state. These models advocate for decentralized economic control directly by the workers or community rather than through a centralized government."

Aww, too bad you couldn't make any argument yourself. Instead, you cite an irrelevant LLM response.
Philosophies do not reflect the real world results. These utopian ideals always resort to statism... every time. It's only through ignorance of history, economics, and basic human nature that anyone believes true socialism can be maintained long-term. Decentralized socialism cannot arise from within a state, and the economic control necessary for socialism from within a state requires more, not less, centralized control. It's the insurmountable paradox of socialism.

Now go ahead and cherry-pick this post with another completely irrelevant LLM citation.

Quote:Philosophies do not reflect the real world results. These utopian ideals always resort to statism... every time. It's only through ignorance of history, economics, and basic human nature that anyone believes true socialism can be maintained long-term. Decentralized socialism cannot arise from within a state, and the economic control necessary for socialism from within a state requires more, not less, centralized control. It's the insurmountable paradox of socialism.

Wrong again dumbass. Once again you demonstrate MAGA's appalling deficit in historical knowledge. Heres 5 historical examples of libertarian or non-statist socialism:

"Libertarian socialism advocates for a society based on non-hierarchical, decentralized governance and collective ownership of the economy. It opposes both state control and private corporate capitalism, favoring direct democracy and worker-managed cooperatives.

Historical and Contemporary Examples:

The Zapatistas (EZLN): Since 1994, indigenous communities in Chiapas, Mexico, have governed themselves autonomously. They operate on direct democracy, rotating community councils, and collective land ownership, completely independent of the Mexican state.

Revolutionary Catalonia (1936–1939): During the Spanish Civil War, millions of workers and peasants took over factories, farms, and public services. They organized society through decentralized labor unions (like the CNT) and direct democratic assemblies.

Rojava (Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria): Founded during the 2010s, this de facto autonomous region relies on "democratic confederalism". It emphasizes direct grassroots assemblies, women's liberation, and a cooperative-based economy.

The Mondragon Corporation: A massive federation of worker cooperatives based in the Basque region of Spain. While existing within a capitalist global market, it operates entirely on libertarian socialist principles internally—worker-owners hold equal voting power, and management is elected from the bottom up.

The Ukrainian Free Territory (1918–1921): Led by anarchist Nestor Makhno, this region in Ukraine operated without a central state. Communities managed their own affairs through local soviets (councils) and built a decentralized economy based on mutual aid."

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

Notice how the ones that existed on a national level didn't last long, much less long-term. The only one that avoids the capitalist market is the poorest.

The Zapatistas are a relatively small population of very poor subsistence farmers, in the poorest state in Mexico. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of socialism.

Rojava relies on oil revenue from the capitalist market.

The Mondragon Corporation only exists and survives through capitalist trade using Spain's capitalist supported infrastructure, no matter its internal organization.

Do you think socialist ideals that can only exist due to the global capitalist market (or are dirty poor) are actual examples of socialism? If so, they are either in poverty or leeches on a superior system.