Election fraud

Leigha Offline
It's scary that the MSM is literally hiding this information. I like this news source, Syne!
Reply
Syne Offline
(Dec 10, 2020 04:57 AM)Leigha Wrote: It's scary that the MSM is literally hiding this information. I like this news source, Syne!

Yeah, you can't rely on legacy media for anything anymore, and social media/big tech is doing the same. Some things I found easily on Google are now nigh impossible to find, and even DuckDuckGo seems to be going that way. And YouTube just said they are actively censoring any adverse info about the election...except from legacy media sources.

The internet is starting to look more and more like China's. The one Party just happens to be Democrat.


They are going to force everyone getting censored to find alternatives, and then the leftists won't have to worry about ever seeing a contrary word against their views.
Reply
Syne Offline
Arizona has now joined with 17 other states in supporting the Texas lawsuit in the Supreme Court against the unconstitutional election changes in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Arizona is the first state that reportedly went for Biden that has joined the suit.
Reply
Magical Realist Online
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/11/945483203...bidens-win

"A Wisconsin judge has rejected another of President Trump's attempts to overturn his loss to President-elect Joe Biden, spurning the Trump campaign's claims that election officials in two counties failed to follow state law regarding absentee ballots during Wisconsin's recount in the close race.

"The certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election, after the Dane County and Milwaukee County recounts, is affirmed," Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek said during a hearing Friday morning.

Wisconsin sent its certificate of ascertainment for the 2020 election to the National Archives on Nov. 30, stating that Biden defeated Trump in the state by more than 20,000 votes.

Simanek said the counties made reasonable accommodations because of the coronavirus and had correctly interpreted Wisconsin's absentee-voting laws.

The ruling can be appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court – and the Trump campaign said it will do so."
Reply
Magical Realist Online
Booyah! U.S. Supreme Court rejects Texas lawsuit against swing states...

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/11/945617913...5ZMXeFzbFc

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday night rejected an 11th hour challenge to Joe Biden's election as president.

The court's action came in a one-page order, which said the complaint was denied "for lack of standing."

"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the Court wrote."
Reply
confused2 Offline
There does seem to be a lot of integrity built into the system - I guess that isn't good news for Trump supporters.
Reply
Syne Offline
No much integrity when widespread voting irregularities, precipitated by unconstitutional changes to election law and procedure, has no means to be checked.

To be clear, that is not the final word on the election.

The Constitution still grants the state legislatures (held by Republicans in all these swing states) the sole authority in picking electors, and legal precedence includes them ignoring the popular vote.
Reply
Syne Offline
Coffee County GA Election Officials Demonstrate Dominion Voting Machines
They demonstrate the same ballots being scanned multiple time, just as we saw on the Atlanta election counting video, cannot confirm how the system handles over voting (more than one candidate in same race), adding votes to the ballot, choosing which candidate gets the vote on an over vote ballot, nullifying the entire ballot, the inability for observers to witness any of this, just discarding stacks of ballots, and adding votes to blank ballots.


https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cMlTolRrHWo
Reply
Magical Realist Online
(Dec 12, 2020 04:19 AM)Syne Wrote: To be clear, that is not the final word on the election.

The Constitution still grants the state legislatures (held by Republicans in all these swing states) the sole authority in picking electors, and legal precedence includes them ignoring the popular vote.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fact...204171002/
Reply
Syne Offline
I've already cited, in this very thread, precedent for multiple states not sending any electors at all. With enough of those, Biden doesn't reach the 270 elector votes necessary to win and it is decided in the House.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An appeals court throws out a massive civil fraud penalty against President Trump Syne 0 217 Aug 21, 2025 09:36 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Intel community covered up 2020 Chinese election interference Syne 1 424 Jun 18, 2025 06:02 PM
Last Post: C C
  Lichtman fails to predict correct outcome of election: 8 out of 10 now C C 2 603 Nov 15, 2024 09:41 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article FEMA agent did tell relief workers to skip Trump supporters (admitted AFTER election) C C 1 457 Nov 14, 2024 08:36 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Labour Party promises 'wealth creation' will be 'number one priority' in new election C C 0 380 Jun 12, 2024 04:57 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Russia's shift to online voting: ‘unlimited potential for fraud’ C C 0 333 Apr 9, 2023 11:06 PM
Last Post: C C
  Arizona "audit" of 2020 election finds no evidence of fraud Magical Realist 0 391 Sep 24, 2021 09:04 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  ‘Lockdown is a class war by proxy’ + Fish fraud is rampant C C 1 429 Jul 27, 2021 11:33 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Republicans' bizarre Arizona election audit Magical Realist 1 539 May 7, 2021 01:23 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Postal worker recants claim of ballot fraud Leigha 17 2,059 Nov 13, 2020 06:17 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)