An audit of 1,440 Nevada mail-ballots suggests that 2 percent of the ballots were cast on behalf of voters who never received a ballot in the mail and 1 percent of them were cast on behalf of voters who said they didn’t vote at all.
(Dec 4, 2020 10:54 PM)Leigha Wrote: Watched a news snippet about that ^ but no one seems to care. *shrug*
Who's "no one"? Legacy media? You're friends and family?
This election has been decided and Biden will take office. If there is evidence of fraud, the powers that be don’t care. Rantings of the general public won’t change anything. That’s not an opinion, people working close to Trump are telling him to concede. *shrug*
(Dec 4, 2020 10:54 PM)Leigha Wrote: Watched a news snippet about that ^ but no one seems to care. *shrug*
Who's "no one"? Legacy media? You're friends and family?
This election has been decided and Biden will take office. If there is evidence of fraud, the powers that be don’t care. Rantings of the general public won’t change anything. That’s not an opinion, people working close to Trump are telling him to concede. *shrug*
Again, who's reporting that? Are there statements on the record, or just anonymous reports?
You're so eager to accept voter fraud and disenfranchisement.
(Dec 4, 2020 10:54 PM)Leigha Wrote: Watched a news snippet about that ^ but no one seems to care. *shrug*
Who's "no one"? Legacy media? You're friends and family?
This election has been decided and Biden will take office. If there is evidence of fraud, the powers that be don’t care. Rantings of the general public won’t change anything. That’s not an opinion, people working close to Trump are telling him to concede. *shrug*
Again, who's reporting that? Are there statements on the record, or just anonymous reports?
You're so eager to accept voter fraud and disenfranchisement.
The optics of all of this, leaves one believing that Biden will be taking office in January. I believe there was voter fraud but not necessarily on a wide scale basis, enough to tip the election. To keep Trump in office would take multiple electors, and from what I've been reading, doesn't seem likely. Of course I don't want to see Biden become the POTUS unfairly, and there is reasonable doubt that all votes going to him were legal. By powers that be, I'm referring to mainly the Democrats who seem to be controlling the narrative.
(Dec 5, 2020 03:26 AM)Syne Wrote: Again, who's reporting that? Are there statements on the record, or just anonymous reports?
You're so eager to accept voter fraud and disenfranchisement.
The optics of all of this, leaves one believing that Biden will be taking office in January. I believe there was voter fraud but not necessarily on a wide scale basis, enough to tip the election. To keep Trump in office would take multiple electors, and from what I've been reading, doesn't seem likely. Of course I don't want to see Biden become the POTUS unfairly, and there is reasonable doubt that all votes going to him were legal. By powers that be, I'm referring to mainly the Democrats who seem to be controlling the narrative.
The optics are what you get from your own chosen sources for news. That's on you. I've posted plenty of evidence already that would be sufficient to erase Biden's lead in many states. The Democrat legacy media (but I repeat myself) are not the Republican controlled legislatures in all these states who have the final, constitutional say in who is chosen as electors. I posted earlier showing that there is historical precedence for legislatures ignoring the popular vote, especially when they believe it has been compromised.
The leftist media is going all out to demoralize Republicans. If you let them gaslight you, you have only yourself to blame.
"President Donald Trump filed a new lawsuit in Georgia Friday afternoon officially contesting the results of the election and requesting a do-over -- another in a series of long-shot legal bids that have so far met with stiff resistance from the state's Republican election officials.
This latest suit alleges that the state's election code was "disregarded, abandoned, ignored, altered, and otherwise violated," thereby allowing "a sufficient number of illegal votes to be included."
The Trump campaign and its allies have filed similar lawsuits around the country more than 46 times, and have yet to gain traction. On the same day the campaign submitted the new Georgia suit, pro-Trump legal efforts met with defeat in Michigan and Nevada.
A Nevada judge ruled pointedly that the Trump team "failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence ... to contest the November 3, 2020 General Election."
The new Georgia case specifically takes issue with changes made prior to the election involving mail-in ballot practices and signature matching rules. It also includes dozens of allegations of fraud based on witness affidavits, but with little evidence.
As a remedy, the Trump team suggests the state "order a new Presidential Election to occur at the earliest opportune time."
Democrat Joe Biden's victory in Georgia is narrow -- he's winning by 11,769 votes, according to the current results of the machine recount requested by the Trump campaign. But the result of the recount -- which follows an earlier hand audit -- indicates that the outcome of the race will not change, according to Georgia's secretary of state.
Jordan Fuchs, Georgia's deputy secretary of state, joked that Trump has "spent more time campaigning in Georgia after the election" than before it.
"The state of Georgia is wrapping up its third count of legally cast ballots, and the results have not changed," Fuchs said.
Turns out it also shows the woman in purple, at the left desk, tabulating the same stack of ballots three times, beginning at 10:32. She takes the stack just tabulated, squares them up on the desk, puts them right back in, and runs them again. Here's a slightly closer view:
That woman has been identified, by her business name on her shirt. And it turns out that the woman with blonde braids, who's seen throughout the video, set up the table the suitcases of ballots came out from underneath, and told the observers to leave because they were done counting...she's the daughter of the woman in purple who counted the same stack of ballots three times.
And the woman with blonde braids was videoed palming a USB drive, likely to have been storing vote counts.
And this time period, where there were no observers, is exactly when Biden votes spiked. And the number of ballots the machines can process an hour (time the number of machines) is likely equal or greater than Biden's lead. [Image: EoasU6GXEAgONqW?format=jpg&name=small]
"A lawsuit asking the courts to block Georgia from certifying its election results, and thus keeping President-elect Joe Biden from winning the state, has been rejected by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed a lower court’s ruling Saturday in what is the latest high-profile legal loss for President Donald Trump.
The Atlanta-based federal appeals court ruled in a unanimous 3-0 decision to deny the request by Lin Wood, a Trump ally, saying it’s now moot since the results have already been certified."
(Dec 5, 2020 03:26 AM)Syne Wrote: Again, who's reporting that? Are there statements on the record, or just anonymous reports?
You're so eager to accept voter fraud and disenfranchisement.
The optics of all of this, leaves one believing that Biden will be taking office in January. I believe there was voter fraud but not necessarily on a wide scale basis, enough to tip the election. To keep Trump in office would take multiple electors, and from what I've been reading, doesn't seem likely. Of course I don't want to see Biden become the POTUS unfairly, and there is reasonable doubt that all votes going to him were legal. By powers that be, I'm referring to mainly the Democrats who seem to be controlling the narrative.
The optics are what you get from your own chosen sources for news. That's on you. I've posted plenty of evidence already that would be sufficient to erase Biden's lead in many states. The Democrat legacy media (but I repeat myself) are not the Republican controlled legislatures in all these states who have the final, constitutional say in who is chosen as electors. I posted earlier showing that there is historical precedence for legislatures ignoring the popular vote, especially when they believe it has been compromised.
The leftist media is going all out to demoralize Republicans. If you let them gaslight you, you have only yourself to blame.
So are you suggesting that all of the info that MR posts, and any and all MSM information that I've run across is false?
Do you believe that Trump still has a strong chance at ''winning'' this election?
(Dec 5, 2020 03:26 AM)Syne Wrote: Again, who's reporting that? Are there statements on the record, or just anonymous reports?
You're so eager to accept voter fraud and disenfranchisement.
The optics of all of this, leaves one believing that Biden will be taking office in January. I believe there was voter fraud but not necessarily on a wide scale basis, enough to tip the election. To keep Trump in office would take multiple electors, and from what I've been reading, doesn't seem likely. Of course I don't want to see Biden become the POTUS unfairly, and there is reasonable doubt that all votes going to him were legal. By powers that be, I'm referring to mainly the Democrats who seem to be controlling the narrative.
The optics are what you get from your own chosen sources for news. That's on you. I've posted plenty of evidence already that would be sufficient to erase Biden's lead in many states. The Democrat legacy media (but I repeat myself) are not the Republican controlled legislatures in all these states who have the final, constitutional say in who is chosen as electors. I posted earlier showing that there is historical precedence for legislatures ignoring the popular vote, especially when they believe it has been compromised.
The leftist media is going all out to demoralize Republicans. If you let them gaslight you, you have only yourself to blame.
So are you suggesting that all of the info that MR posts, and any and all MSM information that I've run across is false?
Do you believe that Trump still has a strong chance at ''winning'' this election?
He's just one among all the other of Trump's sheep out their waving signs and shouting the election was rigged. I see these red faced people with their signs and caps and wonder how such people manage to live so out of touch with reality. It's really sad to see such delusional denialism among grown people. I guess even with Biden in the White House they still won't believe it. They'll seal themselves up in their little alt right bubbles and fritter away their lives in resentment and vitriolic hatred.
Dec 5, 2020 02:38 AM
(This post was last modified: Dec 5, 2020 02:40 AM by Leigha.)
![[Image: EoasU6GXEAgONqW?format=jpg&name=small]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoasU6GXEAgONqW?format=jpg&name=small)