Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Why tiny time-travelers can't disrupt their origins? Self-healing physics

#1
C C Offline
Quantum mechanics is immune to the butterfly effect
https://www.economist.com/science-and-te...fly-effect

EXCERPTS: . . . The “butterfly effect” describes the high sensitivity of many systems to tiny changes in their starting conditions. But while it is a feature of classical physics, it has been unclear whether it also applies to quantum mechanics, which governs the interactions of tiny objects like atoms and fundamental particles. Bin Yan and Nikolai Sinitsyn, a pair of physicists at Los Alamos National Laboratory, decided to find out. As they report in Physical Review Letters, quantum-mechanical systems seem to be more resilient than classical ones. Strangely, they seem to have the capacity to repair damage done in the past as time unfolds.

[...] The mechanism behind all this is known as “entanglement”. As quantum objects interact, their states become highly correlated—“entangled”—in a way that serves to diffuse localised information about the state of one quantum object across the system as a whole. Damage to one part of the system does not destroy information in the same way as it would with a classical system. Instead of losing your work when your laptop crashes, having a highly entangled system is a bit like having back-ups stashed in every room of the house. Even though the information held in the disturbed qubit is lost, its links with the other qubits in the system can act to restore it.

The upshot is that the butterfly effect seems not to apply to quantum systems. Besides making life safe for tiny time-travellers, that may have implications for quantum computing, too [...] “We think of quantum systems, especially in quantum computing, as very fragile,” says Natalia Ares, a physicist at the University of Oxford. “That this result demonstrates that quantum systems can in fact be unexpectedly robust is an encouraging finding, and bodes well for potential future advances in the field.” (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Time doesn't belong to physics C C 17 517 Nov 29, 2023 12:57 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article The physics of time doesn't contradict experience C C 4 167 Sep 8, 2023 11:12 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Questioning cosmic inflation: Rewriting the origins of the universe C C 0 59 Feb 7, 2023 04:47 PM
Last Post: C C
  The "what science writing owes to its religious origins" alt proposal C C 0 100 Jan 7, 2022 08:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  The sexual origins of patriarchy & the radical power of love C C 1 396 May 14, 2018 04:50 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)