Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Operation Mainbrace and UFO sightings

#1
Magical Realist Offline
https://www.history.com/news/uk-ufos-mainbrace-nato

"In late September 1952, only months after a rash of “flying saucer” sightings over Washington, D.C. made headlines around the world, dozens of military officers participating in NATO exercises in the North Atlantic were struck by their own UFO fever.

Exercise Mainbrace was the largest peacetime military exercise since World War II. The war-game-style maneuvers simulated NATO’s response to a mock attack on Europe, presumably by the Soviet Union. The Mainbrace operation involved 200 ships, 1,000 planes and 80,000 soldiers from multiple NATO countries—including large deployments from the United States and the United Kingdom.

In a year dominated by news reports of UFO sightings, Pentagon officials half-joked with Naval Intelligence that they should keep an eye out for aliens during the NATO exercises, said Edward Ruppelt, the U.S. Air Force captain in charge of the top-secret Project Blue Book UFO investigations.

As it turns out, they weren’t off base. “[N]o one really expected the UFOs to show up,” Ruppelt wrote in his 1956 book, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects. “Nevertheless, once again the UFOs were their old unpredictable selves—they were there.

Not a weather balloon

The first Mainbrace encounter came on September 13 when the captain and crew of a Danish destroyer spotted a triangular-shaped object moving through the night sky at alarming speeds. The unidentified craft emitted a blue glow and was estimated by Lieutenant Commander Schmidt Jensen to be traveling upward of 900 miles per hour.


On September 20, an American newspaper reporter named Wallace Litwin was aboard the USS Franklin D. Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier participating in the Mainbrace exercises, when he saw a commotion on deck: several pilots and flight-crew members pointing at a silver sphere in the sky that appeared to be following the fleet. Litwin quickly shot four color photos of the round object, which he assumed was a weather balloon.

In a letter to a UFO investigator years later, Litwin recounts that he went below deck and joked with fellow newspaper correspondents that he had just “shot a flying saucer.” This caught the attention of the ship’s executive officer, who informed Litwin that no weather balloons had been released that day. The officer then radioed the Midway, the only other ship in the vicinity, which also confirmed that no weather balloons were in the air or unaccounted for.

“In other words, the skies above this NATO fleet were very carefully observed and nothing flew around overhead unobserved,” wrote Litwin, “But I knew that I had taken a picture (4) of what looked like a ping-pong ball 10 feet over my head.”

Ruppelt and the Project Blue Book team followed up with the Navy and interviewed members of the flight-deck crew. Some dismissed it as a weather balloon, while others had their doubts.

“It was traveling too fast, and although it resembled a balloon in some ways,” wrote Ruppelt. And “it was far from being identical to the hundreds of balloons that the crew had seen the aerologists launch.”

The most perplexing sighting—the one that may have single-handedly relaunched the British military’s interest in UFOs—was reported by a half-dozen Royal Air Force (RAF) officers and air crew based in Topcliffe, Yorkshire, England.

It took place on September 19, as a British Meteor fighter jet was returning to the Topcliffe airfield from exercises over the North Sea. When the plane had descended to 5,000 feet, crew on the ground spotted a silvery, circular object traveling several thousand feet above the Meteor, but on its same trajectory.

In a report preserved in the National Archives, RAF Flight Lieutenant John Kilburn of 269 Squadron said the object then began to descend toward the Meteor, “swinging in a pendular motion…similar to a falling sycamore leaf.” At first, Kilburn thought it was a parachute or engine cowling that had broken loose from the jet.

Then the object stopped suddenly in mid-air, rotated on its own axis and zipped off at incredible speeds over the horizon.

“The acceleration was in excess of that of a shooting star,” reported Kilburn. “I have never seen such a phenomenon before. The movements of the object were not identifiable with anything I have seen in the air.”

Unlike previous UFO sightings kept hush-hush by the RAF and Royal Navy, the Topcliffe sighting was leaked to the press—and splashed across the front page of Sunday newspapers. “‘Saucer’ Chased RAF Jet Plane,” reported the Sunday Dispatch with a photo of five of the airmen, including Kilburn.

The circus-like publicity surrounding the Topcliffe incident put the British military intelligence in a difficult spot. They couldn’t ignore questions from the press, but they also weren’t interested in a serious investigation into UFOs. They’d already been down that road.


While conducting research in the UK National Archives in 2001 for a book called Out of the Shadows: UFOs, the Establishment & the Official Cover-Up, British journalist and UFO investigator David Clarke made an incredible discovery. Despite officials’ repeated denials that they existed, he uncovered documents that referenced top-secret UK government UFO investigations.

The six-page report from the Ministry of Defence’s Directorate of Scientific Intelligence (the equivalent of the CIA in America), dated June 1951, was produced by a top-secret panel of military-intelligence experts known as the “Flying Saucer Working Party.”

According to the report, the five-member team had been meeting since 1950 to analyze reports of unexplained sightings from RAF and Royal Navy pilots. The Flying Saucer Working Party, much like the Air Force higher-ups overseeing the Project Blue Book investigations in America, dismissed all sightings by experienced military personnel as either “mistaken identification of conventional aircraft,” “optical illusions and psychological delusions,” known “astronomical or meteorological phenomena” or “deliberate hoaxes.”


The clandestine team concluded that the only way to get substantiated data on UFOs would be to establish a global network of radar stations and photographers continuously monitoring the sky for aberrations.

“We should regard this, on the evidence so far available, as a singularly profitless enterprise,” they wrote. “We accordingly recommend very strongly that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken, unless and until some material evidence becomes available.”

This was the conclusion shared with Winston Churchill when he fired off a memo in the summer of 1952 reading, “What does all this stuff about flying saucers amount to? What can it mean? What is the truth? Let me have a report at your convenience.” Churchill was shown the top-secret report and the topic of UFO investigations was briefly laid to rest. That is, until Exercise Mainbrace.

Mainbrace revives British UFO investigations—sort of

In the wake of the Topcliffe sighting and resulting newspaper coverage, the British military intelligence was forced to “officially recognize the UFO,” according to Ruppelt of Project Blue Book. In 1953, the British Air Ministry established a “UFO desk” within the Deputy Directorate of Intelligence known cryptically as “AI3.” From then on, all unexplained sightings by British military personnel would be controlled internally, classified as “restricted” and not shared with the press.


Clarke, for one, isn’t surprised that dozens of sailors and airmen spotted unidentified and unexplainable aerial phenomena during two weeks of high-stakes exercises.

“You have all these military personnel on high alert looking for potential intruder aircraft,” he says. “There’s a good chance they’re going to see things that might have otherwise been ignored.”

As to the seriousness of the British military’s investigations into Topcliffe and later UFO sightings, Clarke cites a newspaper clipping published months after the Mainbrace exercises where a reporter pressed an Air Ministry official for the results of their investigation. The official said he had “no idea” if the investigation was ongoing or if its conclusions would be shared with the public.

“Was there any chance that it might turn out to be a flying saucer?” wrote the reporter. “One gathered from the low chuckle of the official that there was not the remotest chance. ‘We take those stories with a large spoon of salt, old boy,’ he said.”
Reply
#2
C C Offline
(Feb 15, 2020 11:00 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: https://www.history.com/news/uk-ufos-mainbrace-nato

[...] As it turns out, they weren’t off base. “[N]o one really expected the UFOs to show up,” Ruppelt wrote in his 1956 book, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects. “Nevertheless, once again the UFOs were their old unpredictable selves—they were there.

[...] The most perplexing sighting—the one that may have single-handedly relaunched the British military’s interest in UFOs—was reported by a half-dozen Royal Air Force (RAF) officers and air crew based in Topcliffe, Yorkshire, England.

It took place on September 19, as a British Meteor fighter jet was returning to the Topcliffe airfield from exercises over the North Sea. When the plane had descended to 5,000 feet, crew on the ground spotted a silvery, circular object traveling several thousand feet above the Meteor, but on its same trajectory.

In a report preserved in the National Archives, RAF Flight Lieutenant John Kilburn of 269 Squadron said the object then began to descend toward the Meteor, “swinging in a pendular motion…similar to a falling sycamore leaf.” At first, Kilburn thought it was a parachute or engine cowling that had broken loose from the jet.

Then the object stopped suddenly in mid-air, rotated on its own axis and zipped off at incredible speeds over the horizon.

“The acceleration was in excess of that of a shooting star,” reported Kilburn. “I have never seen such a phenomenon before. The movements of the object were not identifiable with anything I have seen in the air.” [...]


Given the functionalism view that mental states can supervene on the mechanistic relationships of any substrate of actors (wood, metal, plastic, etc) -- if the latter is performing the correct magical dance for conjuring -- then, like the example of the China brain, who knows what psychological phantasms could be supervening on the shifting configurations of objects and molecules in the appropriate environment.

Human occupants in a plane or ship might be arbitrarily assimilated as components of an under-realized or primitive China-brain occurrence, and become privately privy as a group to its augmented reality insertions. The memories and complexities of their own brains added to that mitigated China-brain could even be responsible for endowing the apparitions in its psychological space (which the humans' own is conjoined to) with intricacy and substantive meaning (rather than being just a disorganized jumble of qualia).

Yeah, I'm partly poking fun at that relic dualism "summoning" of mental properties attributed to algorithmic processes, but if that was possible...

Then the earthly materials and circumstances used for natural explanations of paranormal accounts could still have extraordinary manifestations supervening on them (just as electrochemical, neural configurations have private perceptual and dream experiences concomitant with them in the skull).

Not entirely out of the same ball-park as the long spasms of coincidences and synchronicities(?), which some people erratically encounter. Supposedly being the anonymous way that a prior-in-rank Platonic level or immaterial fairy godmother (hah) communicates by converting its vague message into the workings of the natural world (i.e. they always have a statistical or other ordinary explanation). With the meaning of the "message" occasionally being nothing more than: "You're freaked out by this aren't you? Whatever particular species of rote you're chained in that finally made you feel comfortable has been punctured a bit."
Reply
Reply
#4
C C Offline
(Feb 16, 2020 04:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: Stumbled on this in my internet wanderings..Hey, the top IS ufos..And this video is pretty good.

https://youtu.be/HfUpnwxTBME


Yep, mundane in behavior yet unknown in certain respects. Curious that the host of the video after that asks: "Do you believe in UFOs?"

Maybe that question is the result of a scattered meta-human population on the planet who can identify anything flying under all circumstances. Wouldn't be the most amazing superpower for fighting crime, but useful for something, perhaps, like betting challenges.
Reply
#5
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:Maybe that question is the result of a scattered meta-human population on the planet who can identify anything flying under all circumstances. Wouldn't be the most amazing superpower for fighting crime, but useful for something, perhaps, like betting challenges.

They'd probably just say it's a flattened weather balloon or sun glare on the window.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Meteorological phenomena can account for ‘unexplained’ Loch Ness Monster sightings? C C 0 68 Aug 31, 2023 04:07 PM
Last Post: C C
  Why are there so many UFO sightings in Montana? C C 1 102 Sep 18, 2022 03:44 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Possible Lizardmen sightings during eclipse Magical Realist 10 2,260 Aug 15, 2017 08:21 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Oklahoma Bigfoot sightings Magical Realist 3 1,902 Jan 19, 2017 08:47 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Creepy clown sightings in Greenbay Magical Realist 3 1,027 Aug 21, 2016 05:07 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  The weird ufo sightings of John Keel Magical Realist 2 980 May 24, 2016 07:08 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)