Oct 22, 2022 11:16 AM
(This post was last modified: Oct 22, 2022 11:23 AM by Kornee.)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolog...4a87f813ff
So we have a list of the high-powered team members. No doubt fully reflective of diversity mandates.
Key passage:
"The study doesn't aim to be the last word on UFOs. It will look at previously collected UAP observations (the unclassified ones only, leaving out sensitive military data), focusing on how they could be better organized and analyzed in the future to shed more light on mysterious sky sights."
That omission won't make any real difference. A resurrected Project Blue Book in effect, with ostensibly more open-mindedness, that will inevitably achieve no 'breakthrough in understanding'.
So we have a list of the high-powered team members. No doubt fully reflective of diversity mandates.
Key passage:
"The study doesn't aim to be the last word on UFOs. It will look at previously collected UAP observations (the unclassified ones only, leaving out sensitive military data), focusing on how they could be better organized and analyzed in the future to shed more light on mysterious sky sights."
That omission won't make any real difference. A resurrected Project Blue Book in effect, with ostensibly more open-mindedness, that will inevitably achieve no 'breakthrough in understanding'.