Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The intellectual & moral decline in academic research

#1
C C Offline
https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2020/01/...-research/

EXCERPT (Edward Archer): For most of the past century, the United States was the pre-eminent nation in science and technology. [...] Since 1901, American researchers have won more Nobel prizes in medicine, chemistry, and physics than any other nation. ... Nevertheless, in his 1961 farewell address, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned that the pursuit of government grants would have a corrupting influence on the scientific community. He feared that while American universities were “historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery,” the pursuit of taxpayer monies would become “a substitute for intellectual curiosity” and lead to “domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment…and the power of money.”

Eisenhower’s fears were well-founded and prescient. My experiences at four research universities and as a National Institutes of Health (NIH) research fellow taught me that the relentless pursuit of taxpayer funding has eliminated curiosity, basic competence, and scientific integrity in many fields.

Yet, more importantly, training in “science” is now tantamount to grant-writing and learning how to obtain funding. Organized skepticism, critical thinking, and methodological rigor, if present at all, are afterthoughts. Thus, our nation’s institutions no longer perform their role [...] Instead, American universities often produce corrupt, incompetent, or scientifically meaningless research that endangers the public, confounds public policy, and diminishes our nation’s preparedness to meet future challenges.

Nowhere is the intellectual and moral decline more evident than in public health research. From 1970 to 2010, as taxpayer funding for public health research increased 700 percent, the number of retractions of biomedical research articles increased more than 900 percent, with most due to misconduct. Fraud and retractions increased so precipitously from 2010 to 2015 that private foundations created theCenter for Scientific Integrity and “Retraction Watch” to alert the public.

One reason non-government organizations lead the battle to improve science is that universities and federal funding agencies lack accountability and often ignore fraud and misconduct. There are numerous examples in which universities refused to hold their faculty accountable until elected officials intervened, and even when found guilty, faculty researchers continued to receive tens of millions of taxpayers’ dollars. Those facts are an open secret: When anonymously surveyed, over 14 percent of researchers report that their colleagues commit fraud and 72 percent report other questionable practices. The problem goes well beyond the known frauds.

The list of elite institutions at which high-profile faculty commit misconduct is growing rapidly. [...] The number of academics found responsible for sexual harassment has skyrocketed. Yet most universities simply “pass the harasser” so that faculty can transfer their grants to another institution. A 2019 headline in The Chronicle of Higher Education read: “‘Pass the Harasser’ Is Higher Ed’s Worst-Kept Secret.”...

[...] Retractions, misconduct, and harassment are only part of the decline. Incompetence is another. An article in The Economist suggested, “fraud is very likely second to incompetence in generating erroneous results.”

The widespread inability of publicly funded researchers to generate valid, reproducible findings is a testament to the failure of universities to properly train scientists and instill intellectual and methodologic rigor. That failure means taxpayers are being misled by results that are non-reproducible or demonstrably false. The widespread inability of publicly funded researchers to generate valid, reproducible findings is a testament to the failure of universities to properly train scientists.

A number of critics, including John Ioannidis of Stanford University, contend that academic research is often “conducted for no other reason than to give physicians and researchers qualifications for promotion or tenure.” In other words, taxpayers fund studies that are conducted for non-scientific reasons such as career advancement and “policy-based evidence-making.” (MORE - details)

RELATED: NIH enters game of requiring science faculty job candidates to show track records of promoting ideology-based diversity
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Any time government uses taxpayer money to influence what should be a free market enterprise we end up with bad incentives.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How journals & academic enablers are corrupting reporting on crop biotechnology C C 0 69 Feb 2, 2024 04:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article WHO promotes quackery again + AI use seeps into academic journals C C 1 75 Aug 26, 2023 11:39 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Corruption of the academic peer-review process (climate science) C C 4 154 Aug 5, 2023 05:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Research finds no gender bias in academic science + WHO's pseudoscience problem C C 0 65 Apr 29, 2023 06:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  How Stanford failed the academic freedom test + Dr. Harriet Hall has passed away C C 1 116 Jan 22, 2023 08:43 AM
Last Post: C C
  Mandated political prerequisites drive Jonathan Haidt to quit academic society C C 0 231 Oct 5, 2022 04:22 AM
Last Post: C C
  Academic freedom on the decline C C 0 64 Mar 3, 2022 06:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Bad academic writing of the year award C C 0 64 Feb 17, 2022 05:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Academic ideologues are corrupting STEM (Anna Krylov) C C 0 167 Dec 21, 2021 01:07 AM
Last Post: C C
  Michael Shermer documents the decline and fall of Scientific American C C 0 78 Nov 19, 2021 07:07 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)