Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Quantum conflict: Two observers of the same event may never agree on the result

#1
C C Offline
https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/03/...nd-of-can/

EXCERPT: “More than one reality exists” screams the headline. Cue sighs of tired dread from physicists everywhere as they wonder what otherwise bland result has been spun out of control. In this case, though, it turns out that the paper and the underlying theory are much more interesting than that takeaway. Essentially, modern physics tells us that two observers of the same event may never agree on the result, even if they have all possible knowledge. This is already accepted as part of special relativity, but now we have experimental proof that it applies to quantum mechanics as well.

Let’s start with the simplest possible example of how we typically resolve conflicting measurements. [...] Quantum mechanics takes this idea to a whole new level because the concept of a measurement is different. [...] Now let’s complicate things even more. [...]

This thought experiment, first outlined by Eugene Wigner, has now been realized in a real experiment. It was a bit complicated to implement. Essentially, the experiment's researchers set up an apparatus that makes measurements on polarization that, if successful, leave a record of the measurement encoded in a second photon. Thus, between the original measurement and a new one done on the second photon, we have a simple version of the Wigner experiment.

As predicted by the theory, the setup records cases where the measurement and the measurement of the measurement disagree. Indeed, the rate of agreement/disagreement is pretty much exactly as predicted by quantum mechanics. The conclusion, according to the researchers, is that there are no facts that do not depend on the observer. Or coarsely put, at the quantum level, you may have the option of choosing your own facts.

I don’t see this result as startling. We already know that there are no privileged observers in special relativity, so why should they exist in quantum mechanics? [...] It doesn’t say anything about reality, though. (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Wow, they admit that it's a "bland result has been spun out of control" and then seem to forget that what they're telling us is exactly that.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The spooky quantum phenomenon you’ve never heard of? C C 0 61 Jun 23, 2022 05:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Quantum particles can feel the influence of gravitational fields they never touch C C 1 138 Feb 17, 2022 01:28 PM
Last Post: Kornee
  Debunked: delayed choice quantum eraser + What to know about quantum mechanics C C 5 211 Nov 4, 2021 01:17 AM
Last Post: confused2
  "Human-scale" object reaches a quantum state + Quantum tunneling of particles is FTL C C 0 139 Jun 17, 2021 11:42 PM
Last Post: C C
  Anyons confirmed, quantum computing role + Quantum teleportation achieved C C 3 288 Dec 21, 2020 09:05 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  The quantum agent + Quantum dream time C C 0 279 Mar 8, 2020 09:13 PM
Last Post: C C
  Rebuilding quantum theory + Dark energy from matter + Crossing quantum computer goal C C 2 793 Sep 8, 2017 01:29 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Gravity waves frenzy + Any tree breaks at same speed + Big Bang liquid + Baby physics C C 0 632 Feb 10, 2016 11:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Universe may have one past (the Big Bang) and two futures C C 1 916 Jul 24, 2015 12:36 AM
Last Post: krash661



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)