Article  The Universe is not the same forward and backward in time

#1
C C Offline
The Universe is not the same forward and backward in time
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/...symmetric/

KEY POINTS: One of the surprising facts about many of the laws of physics is that they’re time-reversal-invariant (T-symmetric), meaning that particles follow the same rules whether you run the clock forward or backward. But there are certain symmetries that are shown to be violated, like replacing particles with antiparticles (C-symmetry) or replacing particles with their mirror images (P-symmetry). Since the combination of C, P, and T symmetries (CPT symmetry) must be conserved, violating CP implies that T symmetry must be violated, too. Here’s how we finally showed that really is the case... (MORE - details)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

COMMENT: But if time is instead crudely, figuratively akin to motion picture film (wherein all differences co-exist) and the specious "flow" only seems to occur on the projection screen (barbarically equivalent to consciousness)... Then, if the latter subjective arrow reversed, there would not be a modification of the content in the frames constituting the film.

Plus, when your cognitive orientation returned to the "forward" direction again, you would not remember that you had been experiencing the world backwards. Any more than the characters in a movie remark about a reversal having occurred. Whether the arrow is forwards or backwards, the possibility expressed in the article above is based on the metaphysical belief that each current state of the world is being constantly replaced (annihilated) by a newly created one (past and future don't exist).

Long before either Minkowski space or general relativity, and instead playing off the precursor constructs of 19th-century mathematicians, who first envisioned of time as conforming to four dimensional structure, this was conceived as the origin of the "flow":
 

H.G. Wells (1895): “Clearly,” the Time Traveller proceeded, “any real body must have extension in four directions: it must have Length, Breadth, Thickness, and—Duration. But through a natural infirmity of the flesh, which I will explain to you in a moment, we incline to overlook this fact. There are really four dimensions, three which we call the three planes of Space, and a fourth, Time. There is, however, a tendency to draw an unreal distinction between the former three dimensions and the latter, because it happens that our consciousness moves intermittently in one direction along the latter from the beginning to the end of our lives." --The Time Machine
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Time might not exist - and we're starting to understand why C C 5 79 Dec 10, 2025 02:24 AM
Last Post: stryder
  Dual realities: 2 different theories that describe the same physical system C C 2 729 Sep 8, 2025 05:14 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article The universe is not made of information C C 5 786 Aug 5, 2025 08:54 PM
Last Post: stryder
  Article Biology, not physics, holds the key to reality + The Universe is not symmetric C C 0 559 May 10, 2025 01:04 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article QM, WH, and relational universe + Can time emerge from a timeless world? C C 0 433 Feb 21, 2025 08:35 PM
Last Post: C C
  Time is the increase of order, not disorder (Towards a new arrow of time) C C 1 588 Jul 30, 2022 05:06 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  Quantum hair + Our universe may have a twin that runs backward in time C C 1 475 Mar 18, 2022 03:59 AM
Last Post: Kornee
  Information of visible universe measured + How GR warps time across a millimeter C C 0 378 Oct 19, 2021 05:32 PM
Last Post: C C
  The universe is not made of mathematics C C 16 1,931 Jun 25, 2021 05:02 PM
Last Post: Syne
  The many-worlds theory, explained + Universe is not purely mathematical in nature C C 19 3,981 Jun 1, 2020 06:32 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)