Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

James Watson Stripped of Honorary Titles for Racist Remarks

#1
Secular Sanity Offline
Quote:James Watson, the lab's former director and Nobel Prize-winning pioneer in DNA research, recently publicly repeated his belief that blacks are genetically inferior to whites in intelligence.

Nancy Hopkins, an emeriti professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said Watson had been a mentor to her when he was a professor at Harvard University and she was a student at Radcliffe College.

Yet last year, Watson told her the reason for the paucity of prominent female scientists is genetic differences, Hopkins said Saturday. “It’s just what he’s saying about race.”

Hopkins is perplexed how a brilliant scientist who once was ahead of his time in promoting women in the sciences and never uttered a racist word to her would now say women and black people are genetically inferior.

Hopkins supports the laboratory’s decision to take away the honorary titles. “It’s like he’s a different person,” she said.

Mannucci said Saturday that he gave Watson two opportunities over six months to clarify his 2007 remarks, and each time he defended them.

“It wasn’t to nail him or get him,” Mannucci said. “It wasn’t a gotcha question. It was to be fair to him.” [source]
Reply
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Jan 13, 2019 07:31 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: . . . Hopkins is perplexed how a brilliant scientist who once was ahead of his time in promoting women in the sciences and never uttered a racist word to her would now say women and black people are genetically inferior.

Hopkins supports the laboratory’s decision to take away the honorary titles. “It’s like he’s a different person,” she said.


Different celebrity spheres, but not unlike when the late Marvel icon Stan Lee, at age 94, got accused of sexual misconduct by his caregivers. A study published circa a decade ago concluded that in elderly people there is cognitive deterioration and indifference about consequences, with politically incorrect remarks being common in the list of their "new" uninhibited speech patterns. Since Watson is 90, there's thus a huge "duh" here as to what particular "remote-from-common-sense", alien world in the Woke Planetary System that these academic magistrates have taken up residence on.

Quote:Mannucci said Saturday that he gave Watson two opportunities over six months to clarify his 2007 remarks, and each time he defended them.

“It wasn’t to nail him or get him,” Mannucci said. “It wasn’t a gotcha question. It was to be fair to him.” [source]


[Chuckle] Yeah, in contrast to the hate-drenched society of the 20th century giving -- from a general, public level (if not always at an individual level behind closed doors) -- a free pass to seniors in this regard, because tradition was already long aware of that geriatric tendency of theirs... Apparently this tolerant, Adult Daycare "sticks and stones may break my bones but deprecating words can hurt me a lot more" society of today is not a bit squeamish about right out in public dragging the old geezers over to a corner and kicking the #### out of them for uttering mean-spirited things. "Hot dog, we sure emotionally reduced that despicable creature to the dried-out fossil s/he is. We're social justice heroes!"

~
Reply
#4
Secular Sanity Offline
I don’t think that dementia is an issue. His memory seems to be intact and he was only 79 when he made his first public statement.  

"The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.

Dr. Watson told The Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true".

His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: "There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien...94898.html
Reply
#5
C C Offline
(Jan 13, 2019 10:23 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: I don’t think that dementia is an issue. His memory seems to be intact and he was only 79 when he made his first public statement.  


Yah, but anywhere in the 70s is adequate for the potential onset (if not earlier): Brain Atrophy In Elderly Leads To Unintended Racism, Depression And Problem Gambling. Since "dementia" is a loose umbrella classification rather than a single "disease", the executive function deterioration doesn't have to be blatantly accompanied by a full complex of deficits.

Prior to the web holding communications forever, the average candidates for this could only suffer intermittent speech mishaps confined to local domestic or job environments. Whereas a celebrity figure feeling empowered by either their status or the intellect attributed to them in the past might boldly persist down the taboo or controversial public road which their faltering executive faculties chose.

He could have been deliberately covert about his views for most of his career before finally "coming out" -- a bevy of several people's recollections about his private life in earlier days could easily settle that. But if minus such, then Hopkins' claim that he has changed from the person she knew, combined with his age qualifying for the possibility of "senior tendencies", would warrant readers withholding 100% judgement. Even if Tribunals Without Due Process Or Contingent Exemptions humping for a big score of points in their social justice ratings cannot hold back the eagerness.

Racial prejudice and the elderly
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nati...story.html

EXCERPT: Von Hippel, a professor at the University of Queensland in Australia, has found that as the brain's frontal lobe begins to atrophy with age, elderly adults exhibit greater social inappropriateness and increased stereotyping and prejudice. And it happens despite their best intentions.

"At some level, I would say we should not hold older adults responsible for their racist attitudes," von Hippel said. "We call it 'prejudice against your will,' because we think it's not something they can control."

Obama himself noted this phenomenon last March, in his frank Philadelphia speech on race.

Referring to his elderly white grandmother, Obama said she is "a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."

Sociologists have found that racial bias pervades the subconscious of most Americans and that the elderly hold more such prejudices than those who are younger.

For example, 35 percent of Americans age 60 and older believe it's unacceptable for whites to date blacks, according to surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Yet just 16 percent of Baby Boomers disapprove of interracial dating—and among Americans age 30 and younger, the disapproval figure is only 6 percent.

~
Reply
#6
Secular Sanity Offline
If that was the case, a diagnosis might save his reputation. Perhaps, he could be hoisted by his own petard.  Wink
Nigerian blacks have the highest observed frequency of the APO E*4 allele in world populations, but AD is rare among them. This may be due to their low cholesterol levels. Caucasian and Japanese carriers of 2 E4 alleles have between 10 and 30 times the risk of developing AD by 75 years of age, as compared to those not carrying any E4 alleles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apolipoprotein_E
Reply
#7
Syne Offline
(Jan 14, 2019 12:22 AM)Secular Sanity Wrote: Nigerian blacks have the highest observed frequency of the APO E*4 allele in world populations, but AD is rare among them. This may be due to their low cholesterol levels. Caucasian and Japanese carriers of 2 E4 alleles have between 10 and 30 times the risk of developing AD by 75 years of age, as compared to those not carrying any E4 alleles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apolipoprotein_E

Considering the average black lifespan is hardly more than 75 years, that's not saying much.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6335a8.htm
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How technology nurtured New Age ideas in a world stripped of magic C C 3 1,258 Apr 19, 2015 12:14 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)