Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

How technology nurtured New Age ideas in a world stripped of magic

#1
C C Offline
http://aeon.co/magazine/culture/the-high...e-beliefs/

EXCERPT: [...] It’s easy to scoff at the totemic kitsch of the New Age movement. But it’s impossible to deny its importance, both as an economic force and as a cultural template, a way of approaching the world. The New Age is a powerful mixture of mass-market mysticism and idealistic yearning. It’s also, arguably, our era’s most popular ex novo spiritual movement [...] New Age is not so much a discrete collection of beliefs as it is a Venn diagram (or a mandala, if you like) of intersecting interests, objectives and motifs. The New Age ‘movement’ is not a single movement at all. The term contains multitudes.

[...] Even scholars who have spent years studying the New Age movement disagree about what precisely it is. [...] I would argue that if there is one thread that binds together the various New Age movements, it is that they represent a resurgence of magical beliefs in a modern world supposedly stripped of them.

In his now-classic book Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971), the Oxford University historian Keith Thomas framed religion and magic as antagonistic social forces. In his view, when early modern Protestant and Catholic religious leaders persecuted witches, they were effectively trying to eliminate their competition as explainers of the unexplainable. In this, they largely succeeded. [...] ‘The official religion of industrial England was one from which the primitive “magical” elements had been very largely shorn.’ In the process of this rejection of supernatural explanations, post-Enlightenment religious beliefs became increasingly standardised and grounded in the concept of natural laws that it was within the ability of human minds to fathom.

As the German sociologist Max Weber put it 100 years ago, a distinguishing feature of modernity is ‘the disenchantment of the world’. For Weber and the countless historians and social scientists who have taken his theories as starting points, the rise of modern science and ‘scientifically oriented technology’ replaced the ‘mysterious incalculable forces’ that pervaded pre‑modern worldviews.

But what if Weber and Thomas were wrong? Ironically, at precisely the time when Thomas was anatomising the death of magic in the 1970s, bohemian mystics in places such as California and London were reviving it. Perhaps the sole characteristic shared by the modern-day inheritors of the 1960s and ’70s counterculture – from Neo-Druids in Stonehenge and eco-feminist witches [...] to practitioners of alternative medicine, Indigo children and aura readers – is this desire to ‘re-enchant’ the world.

Yet if New Agers seek to recapture a pre‑modern belief in ‘mysterious incalculable forces’, they do so using all the tools of contemporary technology and the networks of modern globalisation. It’s not coincidental that the earliest calls for a ‘New Age’ of spiritual awakening coincided with the Industrial Revolution. Or that the triumph of a more formalised and commoditised New Age movement in the second half of the 20th century converged with the rise of television infomercials, books on tape, local‑access cable channels, and the early internet. Today, New Age aesthetics and modes of thought have filtered into mainstream society, influencing everything from the rise of alternative medicine (a $34 billion industry, by one recent estimate) to the triumph of yoga in the suburbs.

Meanwhile, formal religious affiliation is on the decline in the Western world, but this rejection of traditional organised religion does not imply a rejection of spirituality. Instead, it has created a vacuum in which the eclecticism and vagueness of the New Age movement emerge as strengths rather than weaknesses. Which begs the question: if the early modern era witnessed a ‘decline of magic’ and a rise in institutionalised religious affiliation, are we now witnessing the opposite?....
Reply
#2
Yazata Offline
(Apr 17, 2015 08:23 AM)C C Wrote: http://aeon.co/magazine/culture/the-high...e-beliefs/

EXCERPT: [...] It’s easy to scoff at the totemic kitsch of the New Age movement. But it’s impossible to deny its importance, both as an economic force and as a cultural template, a way of approaching the world. The New Age is a powerful mixture of mass-market mysticism and idealistic yearning. It’s also, arguably, our era’s most popular ex novo spiritual movement [...] New Age is not so much a discrete collection of beliefs as it is a Venn diagram (or a mandala, if you like) of intersecting interests, objectives and motifs. The New Age ‘movement’ is not a single movement at all. The term contains multitudes.

I agree. The way that I conceive of 'the New Age' is in terms of religious eclecticism. It's do-it-yourself supermarket spirituality, where religious seekers push their shopping-carts down the religious diversity aisles, now and then thinking 'this is kind of cool' and putting whatever it is in their cart.

So you end up with countless individualized collections of ideas and practices, selected to suit the person that chose them.

I have very mixed emotions about it. On one hand, the 'New Age' is creative and individualistic, which I like. On the other hand, it's often shallow and superficial, as age-old traditions are dredged for bright and shiny objects which are adopted piecemeal and haphazardly, with no concern for their histories or original contexts.

Quote:[...] Even scholars who have spent years studying the New Age movement disagree about what precisely it is. [...] I would argue that if there is one thread that binds together the various New Age movements, it is that they represent a resurgence of magical beliefs in a modern world supposedly stripped of them.

Yeah, that's a big part of it. (Reading that reminds me of MR.)

Quote:In his now-classic book Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971), the Oxford University historian Keith Thomas framed religion and magic as antagonistic social forces.

I disagree with that. It's an idea that was popular with anthropologists a century ago. They wanted to distinguish between 'magical' practices that sought to use supernatural means to work earthly ends, and true 'religion' (identified in their minds with Christianity) centered on worship of God. Magic was dismissed as proto-engineering, before the laws of nature were known. Religion was supposed to be something 'higher' and more spiritual than that.

Of course, many religious practices throughout history have been intended to achieve earthly ends, such as fertility and childbirth, good harvests, avoidance of disease and so on. That's why early people sacrificed to their deities, beseeching them to act benevolently. So unlike Thomas, I don't think that magic and religion are antagonistic at all. It's more of a continuum.

Quote:In his view, when early modern Protestant and Catholic religious leaders persecuted witches, they were effectively trying to eliminate their competition as explainers of the unexplainable.

That's probably true. The problem wasn't that it was magic, but that it was perceived as being heathen.

Quote:In this, they largely succeeded. [...] ‘The official religion of industrial England was one from which the primitive “magical” elements had been very largely shorn.’ In the process of this rejection of supernatural explanations, post-Enlightenment religious beliefs became increasingly standardised and grounded in the concept of natural laws that it was within the ability of human minds to fathom.

That was in large part the product of the Protestant reformation. The Protestants tried to dismiss the medieval Catholics' Saints and Sacraments, miracles, signs and wonders, reducing mankind's only contact with the divine to the words of the Protestants' beloved Bibles.

One of the unintended consequences of that was the rise of modernity. Once people were taught to be skeptical about the Catholics' supernatural eruptions, it was only a short step to being skeptical of the Bible and all of the objects of Protestant faith too. So we saw the rise of Deism (which doubted the credibility of revealed religion) and Atheism (which doubted the existence of God).
Reply
#3
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:I agree. The way that I conceive of 'the New Age' is in terms of religious eclecticism. It's do-it-yourself supermarket spirituality, where religious seekers push their shopping-carts down the religious diversity aisles, now and then thinking 'this is kind of cool' and putting whatever it is in their cart.

So you end up with countless individualized collections of ideas and practices, selected to suit the person that chose them.

I have very mixed emotions about it. On one hand, the 'New Age' is creative and individualistic, which I like. On the other hand, it's often shallow and superficial, as age-old traditions are dredged for bright and shiny objects which are adopted piecemeal and haphazardly, with no concern for their histories or original contexts.

Nowhere is this more evident than at a New Age bookstore. We have a large one here in Portland set up in two Victorian houses. The shelves of books are sectioned off by their own particular school of spirituality--Wiccan/nature worship, Buddhist, Taoist, Kabalistic, Sufism, Reiku/Chakras, Jungian, Angels/spirits, Guru teachings, Channeled teachings/Seth, Robert Monroe/OOBEs, Native American/Shamanism, Occultism, Reincarnation/past life regression, Ufology, Maryology, Christian Mysticism, A Course in Miracles, Hallucinogens, quantum dualism, Yoga, etc.. It's a buffet style accomodation of any particular taste and interest. To the extent that all religion is essentially a reappropriation of older traditions and culturally specific mythologies in a new context, I see nothing wrong with it. Jesus gets reinterpreted from the Jewish ethical philosopher into a sort of New Age Christ. Buddha and Krishna go thru the same apotheosis. The syncretism that used to occur on the collective level over centuries is now occurring in individuals in the course of a lifetime.
Reply
#4
C C Offline
(Apr 18, 2015 07:02 PM)Yazata Wrote: I have very mixed emotions about it. On one hand, the 'New Age' is creative and individualistic, which I like. On the other hand, it's often shallow and superficial, as age-old traditions are dredged for bright and shiny objects which are adopted piecemeal and haphazardly, with no concern for their histories or original contexts.

Yah, in a different commercial market, the pop-novelties that American fast-food chains have spun-off from an Italian dish like pizza and other once "ethnic cuisines" come to mind.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Predictions for Technology in 2040 Ostronomos 3 180 Jan 2, 2021 02:37 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Sawing a baby in half (magic trick) Magical Realist 0 178 Feb 14, 2019 07:01 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  James Watson Stripped of Honorary Titles for Racist Remarks Secular Sanity 6 1,426 Jan 14, 2019 12:29 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Ministry of Defence removes anti-drone technology from Gatwick Airport C C 0 242 Jan 3, 2019 07:50 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)