BFR Developments

Reply
Reply
Yazata Offline
The Last Leg:

This looks like the propellant flex lines that led to the Booster Quick Disconnect (BQD)

(Photo by Carlos Nunez)

Pad 1 launched eleven Starship flights... it's sad to see it end like this... Sad

But it's easy to see how cooked it is. It wouldn't have lasted much longer.


[Image: G6Pz6spXMAAxZSx?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Image: G6Pz6spXMAAxZSx?format=jpg&name=medium]

Reply
Yazata Offline
Big setback at Starbase!

B18, the first Version.3 booster, is at the Masseys test site for structural testing. And last night they were pressure testing it with ambient temperature nitrogen gas, when B18's LOX tank burst explosively, ripping the vehicle wide open. There were no injuries to any personnel or damage to the facilities at the test site, but B18 is a total loss.

The question now is why this happened. Was it a manufacturing defect? Or was it a design defect inherent in the V.3 design itself? Either way, it's not good.

Everyone is saying that the expected Flight 12 launch in January 2026 will almost certainly be pushed back as they get to the bottom of this and rectify it. Given the ambitious goals set for 2026 (ship catch, extended orbital fuel storage and orbital refueling demonstrations for HLS) this could be a major setback.

And everyone is exclaiming that B18 didn't crumple and is still standing. That's being attributed to the much bigger and beefier fuel transfer tubes in the V.3 LOX tank.

(Helicopter photo by Jordan Guidry of WAI)


[Image: G6THWDVW4AARZMv?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Image: G6THWDVW4AARZMv?format=jpg&name=medium]



Here's what Eric Berger thinks:

https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/11/ne...ly-friday/
Reply
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)