8. What is the "I"-object?
a. The "I"-object is an assumed entity that results from identification of Awareness, which is real, with the "I"-concept, which is unreal. The "I"-object seems to exist, but clear seeing shows that it does not.
b. You are not an object and You do not exist--You are Reality (Awareness).
Only the object is there and this is the misunderstanding of reality that results from concept and thought (to conjure concepts), there is no imagination nor entity that has it, you do not exist. You are an object thusly or a concept that takes no existence, not simply is it smoke and fire, it has not existence, it is not substance, only mockery, it is therefore non-existent. Hence, it can neither be confirmed nor denied. Seen nor unseen. Sniffed nor unsniffed. Thought nor "unthought". It is neither here nor there, is nor is not. It is matter not object, therefore Holy, not cannibalistic. He who only perceives 5 objects with 5 senses can no longer see one, neither object nor concept, but real. Please refer to below (quoted from the CTMU):
-Introduction to the CTMU by Christopher Michael Langan.
a. The "I"-object is an assumed entity that results from identification of Awareness, which is real, with the "I"-concept, which is unreal. The "I"-object seems to exist, but clear seeing shows that it does not.
b. You are not an object and You do not exist--You are Reality (Awareness).
Only the object is there and this is the misunderstanding of reality that results from concept and thought (to conjure concepts), there is no imagination nor entity that has it, you do not exist. You are an object thusly or a concept that takes no existence, not simply is it smoke and fire, it has not existence, it is not substance, only mockery, it is therefore non-existent. Hence, it can neither be confirmed nor denied. Seen nor unseen. Sniffed nor unsniffed. Thought nor "unthought". It is neither here nor there, is nor is not. It is matter not object, therefore Holy, not cannibalistic. He who only perceives 5 objects with 5 senses can no longer see one, neither object nor concept, but real. Please refer to below (quoted from the CTMU):
Quote:The real universe has always been theoretically treated as an object, and specifically as the composite type of object known as a set. But an object or set exists in space and time, and reality does not. Because the real universe by definition contains all that is real, there is no "external reality" (or space, or time) in which it can exist or have been "created". We can talk about lesser regions of the real universe in such a light, but not about the real universe as a whole. Nor, for identical reasons, can we think of the universe as the sum of its parts, for these parts exist solely within a spacetime manifold identified with the whole and cannot explain the manifold itself. This rules out pluralistic explanations of reality, forcing us to seek an explanation at once monic (because nonpluralistic) and holistic (because the basic conditions for existence are embodied in the manifold, which equals the whole). Obviously, the first step towards such an explanation is to bring monism and holism into coincidence.
-Introduction to the CTMU by Christopher Michael Langan.