Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Catching Scientific Fraud at Rapid Speed

#1
C C Offline
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arch...ud/557096/

EXCERPT: . . . The problem, she [Jennifer Byrne] realized upon closer inspection, was that the papers, all of them from China, referred to the wrong nucleotide sequence [...] being used to deactivate the gene and observe the resulting effects in cancer cells. Either the experiments weren’t examining what they claimed, or they hadn’t been done as described. [...] What’s worse, each dubious paper contained the seeds of potentially more bad research.

Shocked by her discovery, Byrne resolved to do what she could to expose academic fraud and junk science within her field. With the help of Cyril Labbé [...] she has managed to identify about 50 suspicious papers since then with only limited time and resources. In response to her efforts, scientific journals have retracted at least 10 papers, with several more retractions confirmed to be in the pipeline. In recognition of her work, the scientific journal Nature named Byrne among its “10 people who mattered” last year.

Despite all this, Byrne [...] is adamant that she has only scratched the surface of a much deeper problem. Certain there is more to expose, she is working to establish a team capable of elevating her side project into a dedicated operation. Fraudulent, plagiarized, or otherwise shoddy research is a problem not just in cancer research, after all, but across all scientific disciplines, and over the last two decades, retractions have exploded. [...] 2016 [...] recorded nearly 1,400 in that year alone.

To be sure, these numbers make up a small fraction of all published studies. But while a report analyzing U.S.-funded research between 1992 and 2012 estimated that the cost of scientific misconduct amounted to just a fraction of a percent of the National Institutes of Health budget during these years, its authors also noted that “the greatest costs of misconduct—preventable illness or the loss of human life due to misinformation in the medical literature—were not directly assessed.”

MORE: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arch...ud/557096/
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The lasting impacts of scientific fraud C C 0 62 Feb 14, 2024 08:53 PM
Last Post: C C
  Why research fraud is getting worse + Trust in sci & vaccines still declining. Why? C C 0 47 Nov 28, 2023 06:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit C C 0 56 Aug 12, 2023 04:05 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullsh!t C C 1 78 Jul 7, 2023 07:31 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Shaky evidence for medical cannabis + The fraud behind the “discovery” of element 118 C C 0 58 Jun 13, 2023 02:24 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Is peer review doomed? + AI makes sci fraud easier + Non-humans authoring sci papers C C 0 62 Mar 18, 2023 11:35 PM
Last Post: C C
  Who is responsible for research fraud? + Science of placebos is fueling quackery C C 0 202 Dec 12, 2022 07:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Biomedical (& social) sciences are riddled with fraud: Real scandal behind ivermectin C C 1 74 Oct 26, 2021 05:16 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Why are gamers so much better than scientists at catching fraud? C C 0 105 Jul 6, 2021 11:51 PM
Last Post: C C
  SciAm's anti-medical rant at Dr Gunter + Was the oldest woman in the world a fraud? C C 0 274 Dec 2, 2019 06:35 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)