The military keeps encountering ufos...why doesn't the Pentagon care?

[Syne]

Depends on who owns them, and their weapons weight capacity.
So aliens would need spy crafts that largely allude detection, but humans don't? Sure.  

Why do aliens need spycraft when almost all sightings show a concerted effort at gawdy display? I mean these things are lit up like carnival rides. So whatever the intent of the ufo, it isn't to hide.

Yeah, I've already debunked two of your "gawdy (sic) displays".
This one, that was just jets flying in formation: https://www.scivillage.com/thread-4808.html
And another one that was just a sky lantern.

[Magical Realist]

LOL! Boy howdy! Look at all these Chinese lanterns!

http://www.ufoevidence.org/Cases/CaseVie...andardCase

[Syne]

Yeah, I can't get any of the supposed photos to show on that cite.
And only one was a sky lantern, but I can see why you'd be so desperate to make an argument ad absurdum, or anything else you can think of, in the vain hope of swaying people to your dogmatic beliefs.

[Magical Realist]

Yeah, I can't get any of the supposed photos to show on that cite.
And only one was a sky lantern, but I can see why you'd be so desperate to make an argument ad absurdum, or anything else you can think of, in the vain hope of swaying people to your dogmatic beliefs.

Awwww..facts won't hurt you. It's just 260 little old ufo cases for anyone to peruse on their own time. And more besides..

[Syne]

Yeah, I can't get any of the supposed photos to show on that cite.
And only one was a sky lantern, but I can see why you'd be so desperate to make an argument ad absurdum, or anything else you can think of, in the vain hope of swaying people to your dogmatic beliefs.

Awwww..facts won't hurt you. It's just 260 little old ufo cases for anyone to peruse on their own time. And more besides..

Again, with no pictures. And everyone knows you're "facts" are anything but. You're a "true believer".

[Magical Realist]

Yeah, I can't get any of the supposed photos to show on that cite.
And only one was a sky lantern, but I can see why you'd be so desperate to make an argument ad absurdum, or anything else you can think of, in the vain hope of swaying people to your dogmatic beliefs.

Awwww..facts won't hurt you. It's just 260 little old ufo cases for anyone to peruse on their own time. And more besides..

Again, with no pictures. And everyone knows you're "facts" are anything but. You're a "true believer".

You can access the photos by going here and clicking on the "next" button dummy.

http://www.ufoevidence.org/photographs/v...otos/9.htm

Here's some vintage photos of ufos:

https://youtu.be/pej93XAoYpI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UEAQkUiXKw

Here's tons of photos going all the way to 2007:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToebfGor0is

[Syne]

No, moron, a picture, not a tiny thumbnail. Only a true believer like you will accept this as evidence:

[Image: DorchesterUK111404-v3.jpg]

And no, not video of a picture, which tends to reduce the already crappy quality of the images.

[Magical Realist]

No, moron, a picture, not a tiny thumbnail. Only a true believer like you will accept this as evidence:

[Image: DorchesterUK111404-v3.jpg]

And no, not video of a picture, which tends to reduce the already crappy quality of the images.

You got your "pictures". Quit bitching. And no..videos don't reduce the quality of photo images.

[Syne]

LOL! If those thumbnails prove anything to you, other than your immense gullibility, you've obviously joined the anal-probing cult.

[Magical Realist]

LOL! If those thumbnails prove anything to you, other than your immense gullibility, you've obviously joined the anal-probing cult.

You don't know how to zoom in on photos with your computer? Figures...