https://www.inc.com/sally-hogshead/are-y...-will.html
while i am not going to take this article apart for specific considerations, it did occur to me the nature of leadership should be quite different depending on the nature of the function.
a Scientific Leader Vs a Door to Door Vacuum cleaner sales team Leader
an Insurance Contact Centre Manager Vs a Emergency Services Critical Response Manager...
stock exchange floor general manager Vs City Utilities general manager...
etc...
i find myself asking the question about homogeneous cult of personality politics dictating public perception models of management templates....
this tends to pander more toward a sales team ideation template. however, the narative is consistant.
those Leaders who Lord their position tend to be the type that burn their own team to hide their innability to build & manage a team that is above their personal capability.
it is not secret that the gold standard class of Leader is one who employs those who are better skilled than they are to achieve a greater sum total result by the team.
however, because Leadership models are often soaked with Mysoginistic Ego Culture
would the world be more peaveful with women leaders
the Leader is incapable of managing a team of highly skilled varying personalaties without forcing the team to worship the Leader.
The Leaders Ego is most Times the undoing of the Best possible team.
Quote:Here's a quick checklist to determine whether you might be the problem in your workplace:
- You dominate the discussion, speaking in absolute terms as if there's no alternative possibility.
- In your hands, decisions become facts. Team members feel bullied into accepting a decision.
- Rather than building consensus, you order your subordinates (that's how you see them when it gets ugly) to do as they're told.
- People feel belittled by your comments, and avoid asking for your feedback.
while i am not going to take this article apart for specific considerations, it did occur to me the nature of leadership should be quite different depending on the nature of the function.
a Scientific Leader Vs a Door to Door Vacuum cleaner sales team Leader
an Insurance Contact Centre Manager Vs a Emergency Services Critical Response Manager...
stock exchange floor general manager Vs City Utilities general manager...
etc...
i find myself asking the question about homogeneous cult of personality politics dictating public perception models of management templates....
Quote:4. Acknowledge your team (rather than seeking acknowledgement).
Show others that you've noticed their hard work. Recognize and reward what others have done right. Commend them on the quality of their work.
this tends to pander more toward a sales team ideation template. however, the narative is consistant.
those Leaders who Lord their position tend to be the type that burn their own team to hide their innability to build & manage a team that is above their personal capability.
it is not secret that the gold standard class of Leader is one who employs those who are better skilled than they are to achieve a greater sum total result by the team.
however, because Leadership models are often soaked with Mysoginistic Ego Culture
would the world be more peaveful with women leaders
the Leader is incapable of managing a team of highly skilled varying personalaties without forcing the team to worship the Leader.
The Leaders Ego is most Times the undoing of the Best possible team.