Scientism and origin

[RainbowUnicorn]

since god is a single entity god is unable to have sex, thus does not know what sex is.
the same as "friendship" god being a single entity is unable to comprehend what friendship is.
a single entity that creates something to play with is making a doll.
God plays with dolls.

This is what is called a truth of god.

it is the word that is written
thus it is the word.


to define ones self as being the creation of god is to claim to be a manifestation of ego.

god the fatherless father is the ego which is the word of truth.

this is what is called religion

religion is a belief

a beleif in being someone elses ego


perfect logic with absolutely no science at all.

[Syne]

since god is a single entity god is unable to have sex, thus does not know what sex is.
the same as "friendship" god being a single entity is unable to comprehend what friendship is.
a single entity that creates something to play with is making a doll.
God plays with dolls.
[snip usual disjointed rambling]

What does any of this have to do with scientism or origin?
You'd have to believe in 100% divine determinism to think "God plays with dolls".
And you'd have to dismiss omniscience to say god doesn't understand sex or friendship.

[RainbowUnicorn]

since god is a single entity god is unable to have sex, thus does not know what sex is.
the same as "friendship" god being a single entity is unable to comprehend what friendship is.
a single entity that creates something to play with is making a doll.
God plays with dolls.
[snip usual disjointed rambling]

What does any of this have to do with scientism or origin?
You'd have to believe in 100% divine determinism to think "God plays with dolls".
And you'd have to dismiss omniscience to say god doesn't understand sex or friendship.

is scientism devoid of belief ?
thus god as a beleif is determinent on a single shared principal of defined belief in Scientism and Origin
Literal facualisation of belief & thought is written(or aurel history) and in turn becomes content of skeptical belief by its nature of perception by the expereincer.

The self in its perception defines the ego as a representation of the self defining others.
God is an other.
a self as an aspect of an other devoid of ego... ?
explained more...
as one percieves the notion of god is one devoid of ego as a force of mechanisation of thought ?

thus can one seperate the ego construct of god from the person conceptualising the god aspect ?