Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Scientists just accidentally invented an entirely new kind of sex toy for women

#1
C C Offline
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/scientists-just...en-1630404

EXCERPT: Dutch scientists have been investigating what happens when you gradually increase the pressure inside someone's vagina. As it turns out, it might make watching porn a lot more enjoyable. There is a resounding lack of research on the physiology of female sexuality. This knowledge gap feeds into the idea that women's bodies are somehow inherently mysterious and hard to understand. Now scientists in the Netherlands report a happy accident in a study in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy: the discovery that applying pressure inside the vagina with a newly invented instrument heightens women's arousal while watching erotic films....
Reply
#2
RainbowUnicorn Offline
(Jul 15, 2017 03:52 PM)C C Wrote: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/scientists-just...en-1630404

EXCERPT: Dutch scientists have been investigating what happens when you gradually increase the pressure inside someone's vagina. As it turns out, it might make watching porn a lot more enjoyable. There is a resounding lack of research on the physiology of female sexuality. This knowledge gap feeds into the idea that women's bodies are somehow inherently mysterious and hard to understand. Now scientists in the Netherlands report a happy accident in a study in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy: the discovery that applying pressure inside the vagina with a newly invented instrument heightens women's arousal while watching erotic films....

Quote:This knowledge gap feeds into the idea that women's bodies are somehow inherently mysterious and hard to understand.

"inability to control women" Vs a patriarchal system that defines "women as material possesions" ...

interesting...

what does "the mysteriousness of child birth" protect ?
men, women or religion ?
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Jul 16, 2017 03:23 AM)RainbowUnicorn Wrote: what does "the mysteriousness of child birth" protect ?men, women or religion ?


One contrarian free-thinker in the UK (below) seemed to feel that "natal esotericism" protected the traditional privacy of delivery and correspondingly also the state of marital bedtime relations. Albeit the latter was historically a wasteland for women, anyway, that not only originated both maidenly and uxorial fondness for horses, but also the extraordinary debut of doctors being permitted and expected to play with their female patients' genitalia (to the point of manual fatigue). That the vibrator was welcomed by physicians at least tentatively seems to undermine the frequent diagnosis of "hysteria" being yet another opportunistic male conspiracy. Wink

Preserve the mystery of childbirth and keep your husband wanting more!

EXCERPT: [...] For centuries, women had their babies in peace without the distraction of men. It was a private affair; midwives and nurses took care of the mother, while a father's job was to pace up and down outside, looking anxious and, if necessary, boiling water and fetching towels. Then came the Seventies, and terrifying words like "bonding" entered the language. Perhaps it was all the LSD the previous decade. Maybe it was a determination on the part of bra-burning feminists that he could jolly well be man enough to watch the birth. Either way, overnight it became de rigueur for a man to be present at the birth of his child. Ever since then, it's been a brave fellow indeed who risked his wife's wrath by refusing.

[...] Let's not kid ourselves. Childbirth isn't pretty. From the mother's point of view, it's akin to extracting an orange from your nostril. From the father's - well, let's just say it makes open heart surgery seem a walk in the park. [...] At first, I didn't really notice the tapering off of our sex life after our sons were born. But eventually, I realised that things had gone rather quiet in the bedroom. My husband admitted he couldn't look at "the business end" without recalling the birth. I certainly don't ascribe the subsequent break-up of our marriage to his presence at the births of our sons. But it didn't help....

- - -
Reply
#4
Zinjanthropos Offline
Dutch scientists have discovered something women have known since the first female monkey person got jiggy with her handsome mate......size matters. Once heard a stat that the average female vagina can handle 8 inches but the average male member around 6. There's a joke there about miles of unused ***** in New York City alone but I digress. Nature has but one real pump for increasing pressure and thank goodness Dutch scientists, male and female I presume, have finally figured it out.
Reply
#5
Secular Sanity Offline
(Jul 18, 2017 09:17 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Dutch scientists have discovered something women have known since the first female monkey person got jiggy with her handsome mate......size matters. Once heard a stat that the average female vagina can handle 8 inches but the average male member around 6. There's a joke there about miles of unused ***** in New York City alone but I digress. Nature has but one real pump for increasing pressure and thank goodness Dutch scientists, male and female I presume, have finally figured it out.

It sounds to me like very few have figured it out.

We’re not from another planet for Christ’s sake.  I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the size thing is sort of a myth.  While it may provide added pressure from inside and behind the clitoris, it's still all about the clitoris!!!

We all developed from the same material.  A clitoris is like an internal penis and a penis like an external clitoris.  


[Image: picture1.png]
[Image: picture1.png]



Behold...the entire clitoris!  It's not mysterious.  It's just bigger than everyone once thought.


[Image: Clitoris.jpeg]
[Image: Clitoris.jpeg]



The only difference between the so-called vaginal orgasm (myth, BTW) and the direct clitoris stimulated orgasm is just that.  One is direct stimulation of the clitoris and the other indirect stimulation of the clitoris.  All female orgasms are derived solely from the clitoris.  The orgasms do feel a little different because one is direct and the other indirect.

The information on the subject is all over the place, and IMHO, completely inaccurate.  WTF, this is crazy.  Who writes this shit?

Quote:It also doesn't hurt to understand which sexual positions provide the best chance of her achieving orgasm (hint: the missionary position isn’t one of them!). source  

I’m either a complete freak of nature or this is just plain wrong.

I would presume, based on experience, that the majority of women reporting these so-called mysterious "vaginal orgasms" do in fact reach climax through the missionary position, which allows for indirect pressure on the clitoris from the male pubic bone region. An unusually large penis might be a hindrance when it comes to indirect stimulation. (hint; stay close.  It's all in the bump and grind!)

Don’t get me wrong, both types feel great, but personally, I prefer the indirect method.  It feels more complete.  Some areas of it are more sensitive and can become hypersensitive and irritated.  Direct stimulation can leave you with what a man might describe as a residual erection.

Reply
#6
Zinjanthropos Offline
SS.....If a lover has the wrong attitude or is convinced there will be insufferable harm or inconvenience done to their person for certain varieties of sexual stimulation then they know nothing of real pleasure. I learned long ago that the most satisfaction I could ever gain from sexual activity starts and ends with pleasuring my partner. The worst thing anyone can do (IMHO) is be selfish and only think of yourself at these moments. Overcame the inhibitions, concentrated more on my lady and wouldn't you know it all worked out for the best. Too bad I had to learn it by experience and apologies to the gals who unfortunately did not get the full benefit of me who eventually learned what he needed to know and wishes he could start from the beginning again. I'll put it down to being young, stupid and naive...that goes for partner as well. Kudos to those who understand it early.

You could show me the grandest vistas, natural wonders, the beauty of nature and nothing compares to a woman. Just so you know I would never use that line....lol
Reply
#7
Secular Sanity Offline
This is funny, huh?  I loved it!  Big Grin

IN 1969, WE PUT A MAN ON THE MOON.

IN 1982, WE INVENTED THE INTERNET.

IN 1998, WE DISCOVERED THE FULL ANATOMY OF THE CLITORIS.


Cliteracy
Reply
#8
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jul 19, 2017 04:56 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: This is funny, huh?  I loved it!  Big Grin

IN 1969, WE PUT A MAN ON THE MOON.

IN 1982, WE INVENTED THE INTERNET.

IN 1998, WE DISCOVERED THE FULL ANATOMY OF THE CLITORIS.


Cliteracy

I like the 3 phrase timeline. Interestingly it appears the clit benefitted from the Internet. Took a million years for technology to catch up with the button. Unfortunately site only shows up briefly for me before crashing. 

Who are we? Is it an article written by a guy? Anyway I liked the symbol that appeared for a couple seconds. Happiness is a warm gun or is it when I feel my finger on your trigger?
Reply
Reply
#10
Secular Sanity Offline
(Aug 2, 2017 12:51 AM)confused2 Wrote: Clitorises are fine for people without neighbours - otherwise best left alone.

Too funny!   

I have neighbors, but I also designed, and sound proofed my house with staggered studs.  Big Grin
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research New kind of fusion reactor built at government lab C C 0 39 Apr 8, 2024 08:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Myth? Vibrator invented to treat female patients suffering from hysteria C C 0 392 Nov 8, 2018 02:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Things That May Never be Invented Zinjanthropos 5 1,113 Dec 1, 2016 07:03 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)