New Zealand Prepares First Satellite Launch

#11
C C Offline
(Dec 17, 2018 06:57 PM)Yazata Wrote: . . . Payload was 13 little cubesats. Ten were part of NASA's Elana 19 package, consisting of small R&D satellites from universities and places like that, with the remaining three from the Aerospace Corporation and DARPA.

Radar has catalogued 15 objects in that orbit. The other two are probably parts of the rocket that carried and ejected the little satellites. [...] Jonathan McDowell identifies ten of the 13 cubesats here [...] One of them was actually built by K-12 students at a STEM charter school in northern Idaho. It's called the DaVinci Project. [...]

The burgeoning onslaught of all these mini-sats has to make one wonder initially about the space junk problem.

Do Small Satellites Make For More Space Junk?: . . . The Earth is already surrounded by space junk. Isn't launching 100-plus nanosatellites a bit like throwing crumbs on the living room floor? Luckily, many satellites are able to do something crumbs aren't. They clean themselves up. Small satellites launched into orbit 650 kilometers or less above the surface of the Earth soon fall back down toward Earth. They plunge through the Earth's atmosphere and, because they're small, they burn up before reaching the ground. In addition, few spacecraft orbit below 650 kilometers in altitude, so there's not as much for small satellites to hit. [...] Problems arise when people send smaller satellites into higher orbit....

The Space Junk Problem Is About to Get a Whole Lot Gnarlier: . . . Little orbiters—especially the smallest types, CubeSats and NanoSats—are within reach of research scientists, government agency experiments, smaller companies, and even individual humans. Take the private Breakthrough Starshot project, which eventually plans to send diminutive spacecraft to Alpha Centauri star system (really). It just launched six "Sprites": the world's smallest satellites, measuring 3.5 centimeters on a side.

All of those satellite operators are in charge of making sure what they sent up comes back down, in a timely way. Bigsat operators can just use the last of their fuel to plunge their darlings toward the ocean. But many smallsats, especially the smallest kinds, don’t have propulsion systems. To naturally “de-orbit” fast, they have to be in an orbit that naturally decays quickly—an ellipse in which atmospheric drag drags them back to Earth fast. Some smallsat operators are planning to put propulsion systems aboard. Great! But that poses another problem: explosions....


~
Reply
#12
Yazata Offline
(Dec 18, 2018 05:30 AM)C C Wrote: The burgeoning onslaught of all these mini-sats has to make one wonder initially about the space junk problem.

Speaking of space junk, the Orbcomm OG-1 communications satellite suddenly exploded into 34 pieces on Dec 22.

The U.S. Air Force's Space Command says that there's no evidence of a collision, but the most obvious explanation for what could burst a satellite into lots of fragments might be exactly that. (Satellites are going 18,000 mph, much faster than a bullet. Hit something with that kind of relative velocity, and...)

Other possibilities: Did this satellite have propellant or pressurized gasses on board that were capable of exploding? Did some insidious country try out an asat weapon? (Which would probably involve a collision, except not accidental.)

https://twitter.com/18SPCS/status/1080161833837780998

It's not the first time it's happened either. In February 2018:

https://twitter.com/18SPCS/status/963629809921351680

and in May

https://twitter.com/18SPCS/status/999028332229312513

So apparently satellites and spent rocket stages and other stuff in orbit does explode, and more often than people think. Even if the explosions aren't the result of space junk, they seem to be a source of more of it.
Reply
#13
C C Offline
(Jan 1, 2019 11:35 PM)Yazata Wrote: . . . So apparently satellites and spent rocket stages and other stuff in orbit does explode, and more often than people think. Even if the explosions aren't the result of space junk, they seem to be a source of more of it.


Lots of wild proposals about how to clean-up space debris, some of them even superficially tested in this decade.

The history of both "sober" and screwball space-opera seems largely disinterested in our local variety junk harvesting. Having leaped over the latter to the "glamour" of interstellar garbage scows and scrapyards. The short-lived, parody TV show "Quark" premiered over 41 years ago.

~
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Launch Stuff Yazata 89 14,971 Dec 9, 2025 12:50 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Article New Glenn to be transformed into super-heavy duty launch vehicle C C 0 124 Nov 21, 2025 07:28 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Air Force, FAA clear SpaceX to launch 120 Falcon 9 rockets yearly from Cape Canaveral C C 0 597 Sep 12, 2025 07:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Rocketlab Launch Upcoming Yazata 47 9,320 Aug 31, 2025 06:04 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Article SpaceX reveals why the last two Starships failed as another launch draws near C C 1 675 Aug 17, 2025 04:21 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  75th Anniversary of First Rocket Launch at Cape Canaveral Yazata 0 728 Jul 25, 2025 02:29 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Smolship's Scale Model Starship Launch Yazata 3 968 Jun 8, 2025 03:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Here’s why SpaceX’s competitors are crying foul over Starship launch plans C C 0 695 Jul 6, 2024 11:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  2023 Payload to Orbit by Launch Provider Yazata 2 874 Dec 14, 2023 06:42 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Space Systems Command Announce 21 Launch Contracts for 2024 Yazata 1 679 Nov 1, 2023 08:41 PM
Last Post: Yazata



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)