Article  SpaceX reveals why the last two Starships failed as another launch draws near

#1
C C Offline
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/08/sp...raws-near/

EXCERPT: SpaceX identified the most probable cause for the May failure as a faulty main fuel tank pressurization system diffuser located on the forward dome of Starship's primary methane tank. The diffuser failed a few minutes after launch, when sensors detected a pressure drop in the main methane tank and a pressure increase in the ship's nose cone just above the tank.

The rocket compensated for the drop in main tank pressure and completed its engine burn, but venting from the nose cone and a worsening fuel leak overwhelmed Starship's attitude control system. Finally, detecting a major problem, Starship triggered automatic onboard commands to vent all remaining propellant into space and "passivate" itself before an unguided reentry over the Indian Ocean, prematurely ending the test flight.

Engineers recreated the diffuser failure on the ground during the investigation, and then redesigned the part to better direct pressurized gas into the main fuel tank. This will also "substantially decrease" strain on the diffuser structure, SpaceX said.

The FAA, charged with ensuring commercial rocket launches don't endanger public safety, signed off on the investigation and gave the green light for SpaceX to fly Starship again when it is ready.

"SpaceX can now proceed with Starship Flight 10 launch operations under its current license," the FAA said.

"The upcoming flight will continue to expand the operating envelope on the Super Heavy booster, with multiple landing burn tests planned," SpaceX said in an update posted to its website Friday. "It will also target similar objectives as previous missions, including Starship's first payload deployment and multiple reentry experiments geared towards returning the upper stage to the launch site for catch."

In the aftermath of the test flight in May, SpaceX hoped to fly Starship again by late June or early July. But another accident June 18, this time on the ground, delayed the program another couple of months. The Starship vehicle SpaceX assigned to the next flight, designated Ship 36, exploded on a test stand in Texas as teams filled it with cryogenic propellants for an engine test-firing.

The accident destroyed the ship and damaged the test site, prompting SpaceX to retrofit the sole active Starship launch pad to support testing of the next ship in line—Ship 37. Those tests included a brief firing of all six of the ship's Raptor engines August 1.

After Ship 37's final spin prime test Wednesday, workers transported the rocket back to a hangar for evaluation, and crews immediately got to work transitioning the launch pad back to its normal configuration to host a full Super Heavy/Starship stack.

SpaceX said the explosion on the test stand in June was likely caused by damage to a high-pressure nitrogen storage tank inside Starship's payload bay section. This tank, called a composite overwrapped pressure vessel, or COPV, violently ruptured and led to the ship's fiery demise. SpaceX said COPVs on upcoming flights will operate at lower pressures, and managers ordered additional inspections on COPVs to look for damage, more proof testing, more stringent acceptance criteria, and a hardware change to address the problem... (MORE - missing details)
Reply
#2
Yazata Offline
Screenshot from the SpaceX in-flight video of Flight 9, showing white particulate matter floating around the cargo bay. It generated quite a bit of comment at the time as people wondered what it was. Given the explanation of the ship failure, telling us that pressurized gaseous and then liquid methane was leaking into the cargo compartment/nosecone from the autogenous tank pressurization system, it's probably methane droplets/ice/snow.


[Image: GyaZV_eXwAAapAy?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Image: GyaZV_eXwAAapAy?format=jpg&name=medium]

Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Launch Stuff Yazata 87 13,911 Oct 20, 2025 01:00 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Article Air Force, FAA clear SpaceX to launch 120 Falcon 9 rockets yearly from Cape Canaveral C C 0 461 Sep 12, 2025 07:33 PM
Last Post: C C
  Rocketlab Launch Upcoming Yazata 47 8,622 Aug 31, 2025 06:04 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  75th Anniversary of First Rocket Launch at Cape Canaveral Yazata 0 599 Jul 25, 2025 02:29 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Smolship's Scale Model Starship Launch Yazata 3 886 Jun 8, 2025 03:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Here’s why SpaceX’s competitors are crying foul over Starship launch plans C C 0 641 Jul 6, 2024 11:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  2023 Payload to Orbit by Launch Provider Yazata 2 769 Dec 14, 2023 06:42 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Space Systems Command Announce 21 Launch Contracts for 2024 Yazata 1 600 Nov 1, 2023 08:41 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Russian Soyuz Booster Fails During Manned Launch - Crew Safe Yazata 24 6,011 Apr 5, 2023 06:19 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Starlink Launch Yazata 92 15,441 Dec 30, 2022 09:03 AM
Last Post: Yazata



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)