(Dec 9, 2016 02:32 AM)Syne Wrote: So does anyone else think this speaks to the gender pay gap myth?
what is the premis ?
implied reverse synopsis = the gender pay gap is relative to length of employment in one single industry type with one single employer ?
or
The Gender pay gap is relative to term of employmentin a specified field ?
or ?
there are a few different ways to interpret your inference.
maybe you can be a little bit specific if you dont mind ?
what occured to me as i was reading was
Do women hold the same value of STEM jobs as men do and do women have equal certification for STEM jobs and conjointly
do womens STEM career qualifications lend easier to other fields where they can earn better money and have better work conditions ?
visa vi / = STEM employers are sticking the knife in womens backs to punish them for choosing STEM jobs instead of seeking to make the working conditions and culture more friendly to co-ed occupation ?
pays to keep in mind 1 fundermental and screamingly loud difference in the data by definition of profesional relativity to the role via gender.
STEM jobs working for Government
STEM jobs working for private companys seeking profit rather than science.
2 completely differtent moralities.
you need to split thedata equally so they do not mix and they treat accordingly.
C C
Quote:Relativist-wise or in the context of the interpretative tendencies of some communities, that would probably be slotted as overly idealistic. Selectively expressing a cognitive stance or judgement about high standards which was disparaging.
---- Gender role stereo types is very much a core morality of most cultures.
the pay inequity associated with those values is also a reflection of moral culture values.
teaching is said to be considered quite important by parents of small children, yet they dont think it should be paid well for th ejob.
there is a moral hypocrisy there that most cultures are still too juvenile intellectually to deal with and address.
thus eluding to my main point in that women are expected to carry an unfair/biased/far greater content and standard of moral care and judgement along with etiquite & politeness.
this is closely related to the gender bias that defines morality as the premis of why early childhood care should be performed in majority by the female yet though this is defined by these types of culturally backwards people give the role, thus requiring "specialisation by gender" a higher grade of pay making it instead a guilt trip manipulation process to morally distance themselves from the quantifiable pay equity of the role by class of "equal value of profesional importance" to societys purported moral values.
however if you place it purely on an american capitalistic value system it is fairly equal because small children are an economic loss not a profit making nvestment tool.
so capitalism views them as a leverage tool to expense consumerism for the parents.
Quote:[...] the data revealed women leaving jobs was the result of multiple factors beyond sexual harassment that the survey “Elephant in the Valley” found rampant among established working women at tech companies in Silicon Valley.
oops sorry i think i messed up the quotey bracket thingeys...
anywho.... you need to work in an all male work place and an all female work place anda mixed gender workplace before you really have a good idea of the different types of sexualisation of communication in the work place.
a womens work place has a vastly different nature to sexuality in the work place than an all male work place.
for the sake of protecting women from the massive amount of predators and work place psychopaths and work place sexual predators i will not define the differences for now.
please note i intend to cast no dispersions on members, i am just eluding to this being potential public access.
AND given the
massive backwards move in work place safety for women in the USA since the last election.
i am not going to willingly and knowingly give any potential readers any assistance in the manipulation of women in the work place or anywhere else.
(2) Female leaders said that while their companies focused on short-term items such as cost reduction, hierarchy, and resource constraints, they were missing the boat on some key elements of engagement:
Quote: Accountability
Balance
Continuous improvement
Coaching/Mentoring
Empowerment
Women reported accountability as their number one personal and professional value. The fact that they are leaving in greater numbers than men shows that they have less tolerance for unfair practices that inhibit their ability to achieve excellence. We know this sense of dissatisfaction is running rampant among younger female workers, too.
interestingly enough if you look at those values on a cost basis, you will notice that all the features of work place quality are defined by a cost profile.
thus considring there isa global squeeze on currently to increase profit margins by cutting costs as a core company value.
things like work place culture become work place cave culture as costs over rule culture.
accountability = Does not apply if your a man making big sales for the company and sexually harrasing a female who is a lower position of power.
balance = Percieved time to discuss descisions when using thattime is just a cost of wages.
continuos improvement = A company culture requires benefits being paid directly to the staff vie work place culture to maintain the almost free high quaslity continuos company improvement.
(turn the work place into a jungle ruled by fear and you will get people throwing improvement ideas for free to try and save themselves from work place abuse.)
coaching & mentoring = COSTing/ & MONEYing and more cost and lost productivity ... trainers jobs have been mercilesly slashed globabbly over the last 5 years in all profesions
Empowerment = staff development and probable personality conflict with male sales managers = power network cultures in the company.... thats not going to have
money thrown at it.
= money money money