The case against reality + How old & new make the mind ebb & flow

#31
C C Offline
(Nov 14, 2016 07:57 PM)Carol Wrote: But it appears you took offense to what I said?


Sorry about that. I was having a bad day, I guess, which may incite mis-perceiving the style of a troll of the past in some of the occasional remarks and tendencies of any unfortunate newcomer who might chance along at the time.

What's probably really irking me is that I've got a lot that needs to be done offline in the coming weeks, and I keep allowing myself to be distracted by curiosity of what's going on here or at other boards. I just need to outright cut the tie and habit of peering in and stay gone for awhile, darn it. Chucking the mobile devices would really help.
Reply
#32
Carol Offline
(Nov 15, 2016 02:29 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote:
(Nov 15, 2016 05:53 AM)Carol Wrote: I think there are important differences between animals and rocks.  Picking up from what CC posted, rocks do not act and react.  Rocks are as they are because their substance has been acted upon heat and pressure making them as are they are.  This process is very different from the process of procreation that results in life forms.  I do not think a rock has any kind of sensors, but crystals oh, no...  your line of questioning is pushing me off topic.  I am stopping here because this going off topic, and also I am too tired for all this thinking.

Didn't mean rocks think or react. I'm only saying we are made of the same stuff. Technically speaking, does that make us a rock pile?  Smile .

Well, some people have rocks in their heads?   Seriously isn't that the real mystery, how everything is actually energy in different forms.  The next mystery is consciousness.  

Here is a quote from a post CC made


Quote: According to evolution by natural selection, an organism that sees reality as it is will never be more fit than an organism of equal complexity that sees none of reality but is just tuned to fitness. Never.

Do we agree with that?   I think the roach is probably one of the most endurable life forms.  If we had an atomic war, I think it is more like to survive than humans.   And here we so intelligent, but we may destroy our planet in a few different ways.  How intelligent is that?
Reply
#33
Zinjanthropos Offline
6 bilion people could perceive reality in 6 billion ways but when you come right back to it, all the perceptions are of only one reality. We still manage to function despite it all. 

I liken it to speech. Take any word and ask 6 billion people how to pronounce it. Does it really matter how many different variations you hear (different perceptions on how it should be pronounced), it's still only one word with the same meaning(s). Big Grin
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Do our observations make reality happen? C C 1 558 Jun 16, 2025 07:17 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article A radical new proposal for how mind emerges from matter C C 28 3,647 Mar 3, 2025 03:24 AM
Last Post: Syne
  The Mind=Reality Proposition Ostronomos 5 1,072 Nov 2, 2022 12:29 AM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Time doesn’t flow like a river. So why do we feel swept along? C C 2 624 Sep 27, 2022 10:50 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Virtual reality is reality, too (Chalmers) + Interview with Karl Marx + A bias bias C C 0 507 Jan 13, 2022 01:00 AM
Last Post: C C
  The moral case for sex robots (for the elderly) C C 1 575 Nov 27, 2020 04:01 AM
Last Post: Leigha
  Since reality is self-creative, we created reality before it creates us and vice vers Ostronomos 2 936 Oct 9, 2019 09:34 PM
Last Post: Ostronomos
  Logic versus empiricism in the case for God Ostronomos 6 2,635 Apr 12, 2019 04:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  The moral case for nihilism C C 2 1,208 Apr 2, 2019 08:19 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  How Philippa Foot set her mind against prevailing moral philosophy C C 1 770 Dec 6, 2017 04:07 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)