Global fortean breaking news

[Magical Realist]

Do NOT sniff it people!

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1720113009050428

[C C]

Meh. There's always something falling in that area. There was a haboob that came through circa that day (Aug 6) and another one three days before that deposited fine dust and other material. And residents were already hypersensitive about sky stuff due to a different "strange substance" incident earlier in the year (below).

(February 12, 2026): Multiple neighborhoods in Phoenix and Tempe were shaken on February 5, 2026, when residents reported a strange substance falling from the sky [...] The U.S. Army acknowledged that the incident may have involved one of its aircraft, though details remain under investigation.

(June 24, 2026): The U.S. Army said a helicopter spilled fuel over Tempe and Phoenix because of a maintenance issue and an intentional release by the pilot. [...] An Army spokesperson confirmed the helicopter was leaking fuel, but the visible fuel residue seen on cars was likely caused by an intentional fuel release because of mechanical issues affecting the flight operations.

(July 31, 2026: An internal investigation reveals a U.S. Army helicopter that released fuel over neighborhoods in Tempe and Phoenix did so intentionally to reduce weight so the aircraft could be airlifted out of state. [...] The helicopter was too heavy to be transported inside the C-17 because of the fuel in its tanks, and neither Papago Park nor Sky Harbor had defueling capabilities. The report said the Army needed to move the helicopter on the night of Feb. 5, decided it would dump gas, and “just left it at that.” [...] The report said crews believed they had enough altitude so that there would be no negative impacts from the fuel dump, but could not recall what altitude they were at, and said they did not realize they were over populated areas. [...] The report concludes crews did not follow protocol and skipped or accelerated necessary steps due to time constraints.

(Oct 6, 2026) Something is alway falling from the sky in Phoenix ... https://youtu.be/ck8_RKGdJf4

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ck8_RKGdJf4

[Magical Realist]

Interesting UAP in New Jersey:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1832706798048347

[Syne]

Another airplane flying with landing lights on. 9_9

[Magical Realist]

Which totally explains how it went vertical and then just suddenly zipped away in seconds.

[Syne]

Video only shows it banking in a turn. You can see the entire outline of the plane, including the tail, when it's close.

[Magical Realist]

Video only shows it banking in a turn

No it doesn't liar. A plane on the approach with its landing lights on would never suddenly bank. It goes totally vertical and she said it even flips. Then goes the opposite direction and zips away in seconds. Also the colors don't match an airplane at all. She also said she checked for a radar signal and it had none.

Here's a clip of plane landing. Oopsie! Look at the red and green lights! And the noise! Do ya think she'd video this as a uap if she lived near an airport runway?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KMxVsMIcCiw

[Syne]

Who says the plane was on approach? You can actually use landing light while in flight, especially using "landing lights at low altitude" or congested airspace. Landing lights were on in the Martigue France sighting in 2014: https://www.scivillage.com/thread-4808-p...l#pid17528

So your unfounded "approach" assumption doesn't negate the use of landing lights, a banking turn, or not near an airport.

Regardless of what some amateur claims, it clearly did bank away. But no doubt, you'll see whatever you want or are told to see. Bias or priming, really doesn't matter. In poor quality video where landing lights are turned on, airplane navigation lights often wash out, blur, or appear as generic white/yellow glare rather than distinct red and green due to camera sensor limitations.

[Magical Realist]

Who says the plane was on approach? You can actually use landing light while in flight, especially using "landing lights at low altitude" or congested airspace.

Say again? Landing lights? lol

Regardless of what some amateur claims, it clearly did bank away. But no doubt, you'll see whatever you want or are told to see.

No it didn't. It went completely vertical. Which she confirmed. I don't make up shit that isn't seen on the video or witnessed by the videographer just because I'm too chickenshit to believe there are uaps out there.

In poor quality video where landing lights are turned on, airplane navigation lights often wash out, blur, or appear as generic white/yellow glare rather than distinct red and green due to camera sensor limitations.

Yep..just like we saw in the video of the actual plane. lol

[Syne]

LOL! Notice how you have to arduously avoid the landing lights in fight, that you admitted to, in your own post about the Martigue France sighting: https://www.scivillage.com/thread-4808-p...l#pid17528

In poor quality video where landing lights are turned on, airplane navigation lights often wash out, blur, or appear as generic white/yellow glare rather than distinct red and green due to camera sensor limitations.

Yep..just like we saw in the video of the actual plane. lol

You mean a much higher quality video? 9_9