Sep 28, 2026 01:18 AM
(This post was last modified: Sep 28, 2026 02:50 AM by C C.)
She deserves kudos for being a true believer, though. One might have to go back to the old comrade days of militants wearing the same social-class-blind clothing to find one of the revolutionary elites willing to send their kid to a literal prole dump.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
ACCESSIBLE BACKGROUND ARTICLE: NYT writer Nikole Hannah-Jones’ daughter says she only turned out fine after fighting for better high school than her mom wanted
MATT WALSH
https://youtu.be/CV3HTFqCYiE
VIDEO EXCERPTS: Nikole Hannah-Jones barely writes anything anymore. She's basically like an unofficial figurehead now, kind of like the Meghan Markle of journalism. But somehow even more devoid of talent and personality. But she returned this week with an extremely long op-ed in the New York Times. Where she writes about her decision to send her daughter to a terrible school in New York.
Now she had the money to send her daughter to a good school. But the good schools rather inevitably don't have a lot of Black students. They were too white, too privileged. So she deliberately sentenced her child to languish in a dysfunctional institution. That was more likely to make her dumber instead of smarter, like a kind of anti-education.
Which is exactly what happened. And all of this to strike a blow against white supremacy. Yes, a Black woman was going to make her black daughter dumber. In order to score a point against white people. Very similar to the strategy often employed by BLM to burn down their own neighborhoods out of spite against white people who don't even live in those neighborhoods.
But she apparently believed that because she worked at the New York Times, she could single-handedly turn the bad school around. She seemed to believe that all the students at this school had extraordinary potential and that the only thing holding them back was the school leadership. Which she could influence as a high and mighty New York Times employee. Eight years ago Jones made it very clear that in her view being a New York Times employee meant that she could fix anything, everything. Watch...
[...] So, for ideological reasons, she sabotages her kids' own education, by her own admission. And of course, when she talks about the seemingly hopeless battle for school integration, she's not clarifying exactly what that battle entailed. We did two episodes of our real history series on the civil rights movement, and we focused extensively on school integration.
[...] In virtually every documentary on bussing, the documentaries that children are forced to watch in public schools today, none of this black-on-white racial violence is discussed. Instead, white parents are cast as racist for not wanting the government to take their children, put them on a bus, and drive them an hour away to a school that's much more dangerous and much more dysfunctional than the one they're paying property taxes to attend. So, this is the side of integration that you're not really told about.
[...] Anti-white race hustlers like Jones would prefer you never talk about any of this. They'd prefer to call you racist for sending your child to a mostly white school, and apparently they'd prefer to send their own children to mostly Black schools to really prove you wrong. Except in this case, Jones inadvertently proved the other side right. But not before she unloads a bunch of false statistics to muddy the waters.
[...] Tragically. At some point Jones' daughter realized her mother was torturing her on purpose and attempting to ruin her life so that, you know, she would have something to brag about in the New York Times break room [...] But one day after school, her daughter said, quote, "Did you know my school was this bad when you decided to put me here?" And then eventually she puts her daughter in a mostly white school where she keeps failing her tests even though she thought she got an A.
And then she gets a tutor, and she starts doing better, and yeah, that's the gist. Among other things, this op-ed perfectly demonstrates the perverse, almost exactly inverted priorities of leftists like Nicole Hannah-Jones.
You know, for decent, functional, civilized human beings, the order of personal priorities starts at the most localized level and stretches out in concentric circles from there. So, your immediate priority is the well-being of your family, your spouse, your children, and then from next there would be like your parents, your siblings, and then your extended family, and then your neighborhood, and then your broader community, and out from there.
Well, leftists, they turn this exactly around. So, for them, your priority should start at the broadest and most abstract level possible. You should value the collective, or at least the preferred demographic collective, above your own children. Even sacrifice your child's well-being for the sake of this broad, ambiguous collective. And Jones apparently took this perverse philosophy literally and put it into practice, and it's ended exactly where any rational person would expect it to...
https://youtu.be/CV3HTFqCYiE
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/CV3HTFqCYiE
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
ACCESSIBLE BACKGROUND ARTICLE: NYT writer Nikole Hannah-Jones’ daughter says she only turned out fine after fighting for better high school than her mom wanted
MATT WALSH
https://youtu.be/CV3HTFqCYiE
VIDEO EXCERPTS: Nikole Hannah-Jones barely writes anything anymore. She's basically like an unofficial figurehead now, kind of like the Meghan Markle of journalism. But somehow even more devoid of talent and personality. But she returned this week with an extremely long op-ed in the New York Times. Where she writes about her decision to send her daughter to a terrible school in New York.
Now she had the money to send her daughter to a good school. But the good schools rather inevitably don't have a lot of Black students. They were too white, too privileged. So she deliberately sentenced her child to languish in a dysfunctional institution. That was more likely to make her dumber instead of smarter, like a kind of anti-education.
Which is exactly what happened. And all of this to strike a blow against white supremacy. Yes, a Black woman was going to make her black daughter dumber. In order to score a point against white people. Very similar to the strategy often employed by BLM to burn down their own neighborhoods out of spite against white people who don't even live in those neighborhoods.
But she apparently believed that because she worked at the New York Times, she could single-handedly turn the bad school around. She seemed to believe that all the students at this school had extraordinary potential and that the only thing holding them back was the school leadership. Which she could influence as a high and mighty New York Times employee. Eight years ago Jones made it very clear that in her view being a New York Times employee meant that she could fix anything, everything. Watch...
[...] So, for ideological reasons, she sabotages her kids' own education, by her own admission. And of course, when she talks about the seemingly hopeless battle for school integration, she's not clarifying exactly what that battle entailed. We did two episodes of our real history series on the civil rights movement, and we focused extensively on school integration.
[...] In virtually every documentary on bussing, the documentaries that children are forced to watch in public schools today, none of this black-on-white racial violence is discussed. Instead, white parents are cast as racist for not wanting the government to take their children, put them on a bus, and drive them an hour away to a school that's much more dangerous and much more dysfunctional than the one they're paying property taxes to attend. So, this is the side of integration that you're not really told about.
[...] Tragically. At some point Jones' daughter realized her mother was torturing her on purpose and attempting to ruin her life so that, you know, she would have something to brag about in the New York Times break room [...] But one day after school, her daughter said, quote, "Did you know my school was this bad when you decided to put me here?" And then eventually she puts her daughter in a mostly white school where she keeps failing her tests even though she thought she got an A.
And then she gets a tutor, and she starts doing better, and yeah, that's the gist. Among other things, this op-ed perfectly demonstrates the perverse, almost exactly inverted priorities of leftists like Nicole Hannah-Jones.
You know, for decent, functional, civilized human beings, the order of personal priorities starts at the most localized level and stretches out in concentric circles from there. So, your immediate priority is the well-being of your family, your spouse, your children, and then from next there would be like your parents, your siblings, and then your extended family, and then your neighborhood, and then your broader community, and out from there.
Well, leftists, they turn this exactly around. So, for them, your priority should start at the broadest and most abstract level possible. You should value the collective, or at least the preferred demographic collective, above your own children. Even sacrifice your child's well-being for the sake of this broad, ambiguous collective. And Jones apparently took this perverse philosophy literally and put it into practice, and it's ended exactly where any rational person would expect it to...
https://youtu.be/CV3HTFqCYiE