"Trump spent Sunday posting pictures of himself nuking the planet from a space station, guarded by giant robots, over a caption announcing that the United States now owns the moon. He did this for thirteen hours.
Between 9:10 in the morning and 10:35 at night, Donald Trump fired off more than sixty posts.
Memes, rants, endorsements, personal attacks, and a steady stream of AI-generated pictures of himself. He announced he wants to rename New Mexico.
Stating that it is "one of the great vote cheating states of all time," a casual proposition by the President of the U.S.A. to rename a state that has existed since 1912 and call it "New America" was accompanied by a video of him dancing to Y.M.C.A.
He posted himself as Hulk Hogan. He posted himself in a Space Force uniform that critics pointed out looks like the outfit the villains wear in Star Wars. He posted himself palling around with George Washington, drawn by the same software that cannot reliably render a hand.
He bragged about making billions trading stocks, while under scrutiny for exactly that, and added that the billions were "for the U.S.A., not myself," which is what a man says when both halves of the sentence are for him.
Somewhere in the thirteen hours he found the time and audacity to mock congresswoman Debbie Dingell for weeping over her dead husband, calling her a “third rate loser.”
None of this is a distraction, in fact it seems that this is his job now.
The country is paying a full presidential salary, and a great deal more than that, for a man to be unhinged on his own social media app.
(Sep 8, 2026 06:54 PM)Syne Wrote: So easy to set TDS sufferers in a tizzy.
If he spent 13 hours going out of his way to unhinge people I don't think it's "Easy" as you put it. If anything it seems that it's coordinated, thorough and malicious.
People could eventually sue him for the Mental Health breaks caused by his abuse, which is a bit like being raped and catching an STD from his trademarked "TDS" as he's really been going out of his way to "F**k everyone".
We don't actually know that President Trump created the posts, it might be the work of somebody on his media team. Even if he did do it himself, it pales in comparison to Joe Biden, who spent approximately 40% of his Presidency on vacation, usually in seclusion at one of his homes in Delaware. He wasn't typically available to the press during his vacation time, and it was widely assumed (by Republicans at least) that he was hiding his cognitive decline.
President Trump spends about half as much time off, and even when he is down at Mar a Lago, he's very visible hosting meetings or sparring with press gaggles. He even talks to reporters when he's golfing, his main form of recreation.
I think that what bothers the TDS sufferers so much is that Trump is a master troll. He knows what buttons to push to totally outrage the left and he pushes them frequently and with evident pleasure.
Do you really think there is anything admirable about the President of the United States trying to troll anonymous people online with juvenile memes for 13 hours straight?
"President Trump spends at least four hours a day watching television, according to a new report.
People close to Trump told The New York Times that Trump spends at least that much time in front of a TV each day, and sometimes spends as many as eight hours watching television.
The Times reports that Trump begins each day around 5:30 a.m. by turning on CNN before quickly flipping to Fox News’s “Fox & Friends.” He occasionally watches MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” because it works him up, Trump’s friends told the Times.
Trump’s favorite programs include “Fox & Friends” as well as Fox News primetime shows from Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Jeanine Pirro. Trump sometimes “hate-watches” CNN host Don Lemon, according to the report.
The Times also reports that the only people allowed to touch the remote control for the White House television are Trump and White House technical support staffers."--- https://thehill.com/homenews/administrat...ay-report/
(Sep 8, 2026 06:54 PM)Syne Wrote: So easy to set TDS sufferers in a tizzy.
If he spent 13 hours going out of his way to unhinge people I don't think it's "Easy" as you put it. If anything it seems that it's coordinated, thorough and malicious.
You mean what many people do everyday, scrolling social media and reposting things they like? 9_9
Quote:People could eventually sue him for the Mental Health breaks caused by his abuse, which is a bit like being raped and catching an STD from his trademarked "TDS" as he's really been going out of his way to "F**k everyone".
No, there no legal precedent for suing a source of obsession for your mental illness. Your mental illness comes first, and then you fixate on a target of blame... without any causation working in the reverse. You likening it to rape is the persecutory delusion of your mental illness.
If you can't handle reality, the responsibility falls solely on you to insulate yourself from it.... or grow a set.
(Sep 8, 2026 06:54 PM)Syne Wrote: So easy to set TDS sufferers in a tizzy.
If he spent 13 hours going out of his way to unhinge people I don't think it's "Easy" as you put it. If anything it seems that it's coordinated, thorough and malicious.
You mean what many people do everyday, scrolling social media and reposting things they like? 9_9
Quote:People could eventually sue him for the Mental Health breaks caused by his abuse, which is a bit like being raped and catching an STD from his trademarked "TDS" as he's really been going out of his way to "F**k everyone".
No, there no legal precedent for suing a source of obsession for your mental illness. Your mental illness comes first, and then you fixate on a target of blame... without any causation working in the reverse. You likening it to rape is the persecutory delusion of your mental illness.
If you can't handle reality, the responsibility falls solely on you to insulate yourself from it.... or grow a set.
Syne, you are confusing my colourful language usage as a statement to my rationality. You really should consider that it's written so because to be honest, Trump isn't a nice man, he's done some horrible things and he's responsible for a number of deaths worldwide. That's the truth. (no network necessary)
While you might worship him at some point you are going to have to come to terms with the nature of what you've be backing, unless of course you are a complete Psychopath which means you will not care anyhow.
No, that's still your supposed rationality in question, as you're still blaming Trump for things you wouldn't question from any other national leader. Obama was responsible for many death worldwide... and actually was the one who put "children in cages." I never heard you have any qualms with that. And you thinking I "worship" anyone is still your TDS speaking. I don't think Trump is infallible or beyond reproach, as I've criticized him before. I'm just not a pantywaist whining about someone being "not nice." 9_9
stryderSep 10, 2026 09:29 AM (This post was last modified: Sep 10, 2026 09:41 AM by stryder.)
(Sep 9, 2026 11:29 PM)Syne Wrote: No, that's still your supposed rationality in question, as you're still blaming Trump for things you wouldn't question from any other national leader. Obama was responsible for many death worldwide... and actually was the one who put "children in cages." I never heard you have any qualms with that. And you thinking I "worship" anyone is still your TDS speaking. I don't think Trump is infallible or beyond reproach, as I've criticized him before. I'm just not a pantywaist whining about someone being "not nice." 9_9
No your a pantywaist that whines about everyone that doesn't agree with Israel as being antisemite
-----
As for Trump, his new statement is "He would" pay $5,000 to all Americans if Republicans win the midterm. Further to that it's suppose to be spent on US produce (made in the US) although the costs of policing that would require some serious deep state shit to keep an eye on.
Currently it's not a pledge, because that would require that to be placed into writing and signed as an actionable occurrence should the result come in. instead he's left it as a "Maybe", so the likelihood is that if they got through the midterm he'll just backtrack on it since it won't matter to him, he'll just ride out his term.
I'd concern myself with what that $5,000 would go to. I mean that's a lot of weapons and ammunition that can be purchased by all sorts of people (including the unhinged) While I know the US respects the concept that people should have the right to bear arms, I would question just how many a person needs as an individual and the purpose of buying so many.
Further to that there is the implication that an increase in "revenue" to all Americans would lead to an increase in inflation (So don't expect the federal reserve to budge on inflation), that $5,000 although a "gift" would also be likely taxable if coming from public money.
(Sep 9, 2026 11:29 PM)Syne Wrote: No, that's still your supposed rationality in question, as you're still blaming Trump for things you wouldn't question from any other national leader. Obama was responsible for many death worldwide... and actually was the one who put "children in cages." I never heard you have any qualms with that. And you thinking I "worship" anyone is still your TDS speaking. I don't think Trump is infallible or beyond reproach, as I've criticized him before. I'm just not a pantywaist whining about someone being "not nice." 9_9
No your a pantywaist that whines about everyone that doesn't agree with Israel as being antisemite
You think that's pantywaist and whining, huh? Yeah, if I were an antisemite who couldn't even tell what is or isn't, I would probably be making similar desperate claims to deflect too.
Notice how you can only deflect, instead of addressing any of the actual points made. 9_9
Quote:As for Trump, his new statement is "He would" pay $5,000 to all Americans if Republicans win the midterm.
As opposed to democrats buying votes with welfare, that only benefits their own voters. At least Trump is willing to help everyone equally... as long as he retains enough power in congress to do so.
Quote:Further to that it's suppose to be spent on US produce (made in the US) although the costs of policing that would require some serious deep state shit to keep an eye on.
He said "in the Unites States of America," not on US products. Not hard to enforce:
Instead of mailing physical paper checks or distributing standard direct deposits, the federal government could issue the $5,000 dividend via specialized prepaid debit networks (similar to disaster relief or EBT cards). These cards can be programmatically hardcoded to block international merchant category codes (MCCs), foreign transaction processing, and wire transfers.
- gemini
Quote:Currently it's not a pledge, because that would require that to be placed into writing and signed as an actionable occurrence should the result come in. instead he's left it as a "Maybe", so the likelihood is that if they got through the midterm he'll just backtrack on it since it won't matter to him, he'll just ride out his term.
Trump has kept all the campaign promises that haven't thwarted by lawfare, insufficient majorities in congress, etc.. But if it makes you feel better to make up lies about it being a "maybe".... 9_9
Quote:I'd concern myself with what that $5,000 would go to. I mean that's a lot of weapons and ammunition that can be purchased by all sorts of people (including the unhinged) While I know the US respects the concept that people should have the right to bear arms, I would question just how many a person needs as an individual and the purpose of buying so many.
Well, you have to think Americans are doing very well economically, to assume many would spend it on guns and ammo. You know, ignoring the gross and ignorant stereotyping. Of course you would question the necessity. You don't even comprehend having such rights. Unless you have a "good reason," you can't even carry a butter knife in the UK. LOL!
Quote:Further to that there is the implication that an increase in "revenue" to all Americans would lead to an increase in inflation (So don't expect the federal reserve to budge on inflation), that $5,000 although a "gift" would also be likely taxable if coming from public money.
Of course it would be taxable. And?
To be clear, I'm not personally in favor of the government giving people money. I much prefer that they simple don't take as much in the first place. But if Democrats are always trying to influence elections with promises of free stuff, it's hypocritical to only whine and moan about a Republican doing so.
But you just go on twisting yourself in knots over your widdle TDS.