Article  UK man arrested for posing with gun 4,000 miles away in US (firearm hobbies)

#1
C C Offline
Man arrested in the UK for posing with gun more than 4,000 miles away in the US
https://metro.co.uk/2025/11/29/british-m...-24963842/

EXCERPTS: A Yorkshire man [Jon Richelieu-Booth] was arrested over a photo he posted on social media featuring him holding a legally owned gun in the US. He said he held the firearm lawfully, on private land and with full permission from its owner. The post did not contain any threatening language and described his work and what he had done that day...

[...] But a police officer came round to his home and said someone had raised concerns about the picture, and he should be wary about what he posts. Police returned to his residence again around 10pm on August 24 and arrested him.

The bail document mentioned an allegation of possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence, along with a separate claim of stalking. Richelieu-Booth said he tried to show police geolocation evidence proving the photo was taken abroad, only to be told it was ‘not needed’.

He slept in the prison cell overnight and was then interrogated [...] He was released on bail until the end of October – officers visited him on three separate occasions ... The allegations about stalking and illegal possession of a firearm were dropped, but he was then charged with a public order offence for a different social media post.

[...] he could have been jailed for up to six months. But the case was dropped as, according to the Yorkshire Post, there was ‘not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction’. Jon Richelieu-Booth said he shocked by the ‘Orwellian’ behaviour of the West Yorkshire Police.

He said: ‘I have not been able to sleep, I’ve lived in fear of a knock at my door for the last three months. I haven’t spoken to my neighbours for four months. It has damaged my ability to run my business. It was a massive overreach by the police. I thought 1984 was a book, not an instruction manual.’

A West Yorkshire Police spokesperson said: ‘Police received a complaint of stalking involving serious alarm or distress, relating partly to social media posts, several of which included pictures of a male posing with a variety of firearms which the complainant took to be a threat. Police investigated and charged a man with a public order offence but the case was then discontinued by the CPS.’

[...] Gun laws vary wildly between the United States and the UK, here we take a look at the key differences... (MORE - missing details)
Reply
#2
stryder Offline
Complete the following:

Customs: "Anything to declare?"
British Returning Holidaymaker: "I held a gun while I was abroad".
.....
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
If you haven't seen Orwellian news from the UK for years now, you haven't been paying attention.
Reply
#4
Yazata Offline
It sounds to me like the individual who was arrested has a feud of some sort with somebody else in the UK. Perhaps that second individual has psychiatric problems. And that second person complained to the police that the guy who was arrested was stalking him and had posted a picture holding a gun, which the second person took to be a threat.

So the police get a report of a stalker with a gun, which would seemingly justify their paying the first person a visit.

I'd like to know more about who made the initial police report and what history he has with the first guy.
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
Or if there's charges for filing a false police report.
Reply
Reply
#7
C C Offline
According to one source, Richelieu-Booth is supposedly an IT consultant. It was apparently one of the directors of a company called Hortor Limited -- that putatively owed Richelieu-Booth and others for unpaid services -- who reported Richelieu-Booth for the photos. The latter was previously accused by Horter of making public statements about Horter being a delinquent client (or something), with Horter then demanding compensation for damage to its reputation.

One presumes that this director of Horter Limited was at least hounded by professional debt collectors, and possibly charged Richelieu-Booth himself of doing that directly (in terms of threats), in the course of pointing out the photos to police.

At any rate, the Aesop adage for this might be construed as: "Don't post pictures of holding guns when in the midst of a vicious feud with another party."


SNOPES: What we know
https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/12/01/u...gun-photo/

EXCERPT: According to Richelieu-Booth's LinkedIn profile, he made three posts on Aug. 11, 12 and 13, 2025, that showed him standing by or posing with guns. All three posts featured largely unrelated captions about his work but included sentences about a "delinquent client."

That phrase appeared to be a reference to an ongoing dispute between Richelieu-Booth and Hortor Limited, a British company that had reportedly failed to pay Richelieu-Booth and other clients for their services. Hortor reportedly demanded Richelieu-Booth pay the company £2.3 million (around $3 million) in damages in August 2024 after he allegedly made "multiple LinkedIn posts about the firm's problems in providing payment to his company and others for work they had carried out."

On Aug. 15, 2025, after Richelieu-Booth posted the pictures standing by or posing with guns, he wrote (archived) on LinkedIn that he "had a visit from the Authorities responding to a compaint from >Redacted<; one of the Directors of the failed Leeds-based Consultancy Hortor."

The post continued, "It appears a post with a snap from my recent vacation (of me with a Shotgun while I was being instructed by a former Special Forces Operative in Baker, FL) has triggered (pun not intended) >Redacted<"

Richelieu-Booth also wrote:

Apparently >Redacted< has made slanderous statements that I have made threats towards him, his Son (>Redacted<) & his Grandchildren and he feared for his safety. Unsurprisingly the person at my Door could not prove any such threats had been made, instead relying on me "seeing how the Picture may cause alarm" proving my point this is theatrics by >Redacted< to try paint himself as a victim.

From Richelieu-Booth's writings, it appeared he believed the complainant from West Yorkshire Police's statement to be a director at Hortor. West Yorkshire Police did not confirm this in its statement.

The Yorkshire Post reported that after warning Richelieu-Booth that a complainant had raised concerns about one of his pictures on social media, police returned Aug. 24, 2025, and arrested him on suspicion of stalking and possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence.

After police held Richelieu-Booth overnight and questioned him about images on his social media profile, officers released him on bail until late October, The Yorkshire Post reported.

Second arrest and charge

Then, in October, West Yorkshire Police reportedly arrested Richelieu-Booth again, this time on suspicion of breaking bail conditions, according to news reports. The Yorkshire Post reported that police did not charge Richelieu-Booth with the alleged breach and told him it "would not progress" allegations about firearm possession and stalking.

Instead, the force reportedly charged Richelieu-Booth with a public order offense, which is a suspected crime committed under the U.K.'s Public Order Acts. The acts created offenses including causing another person "harassment, alarm or distress."

Then, in October, West Yorkshire Police reportedly arrested Richelieu-Booth again, this time on suspicion of breaking bail conditions, according to news reports. The Yorkshire Post reported that police did not charge Richelieu-Booth with the alleged breach and told him it "would not progress" allegations about firearm possession and stalking.

Instead, the force reportedly charged Richelieu-Booth with a public order offense, which is a suspected crime committed under the U.K.'s Public Order Acts. The acts created offenses including causing another person "harassment, alarm or distress."

According to the Yorkshire Post, the public order offense charge was in relation to a different social media post Richelieu-Booth had reportedly made. Richelieu-Booth was due to appear at a court in Bradford on Nov. 25, 2025, reportedly charged with "an offence of displaying 'any writing/sign/visible representation with intent to cause harassment/alarm or distress.'" That offense could carry up to a six-month prison sentence, a fine or both.

The CPS canceled that appearance on Nov. 18, 2025, one day after The Yorkshire Post had reportedly applied to remotely attend the hearing. According to the paper, the CPS canceled the appearance because there was "not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction."

At the time of this writing, police and CPS appeared to have dropped all investigations or charges aimed at Richelieu-Booth relating to his social media presence. Writing (archived) on LinkedIn on Dec. 1, 2025, Richelieu-Booth called West Yorkshire Police's actions "Orwellian over-reach" and said he would "file an action" against the force.

West Yorkshire Police did not comment to Snopes about whether Richelieu-Booth had filed a complaint against the force.
Reply
Reply
#9
confused2 Offline
I'm sure <redacted> operates absolutely legally.
There are company directors who leave behind a trail of dissolved and insolvent companies while retaining a mansion and racehorses.
Picking an example of multiple directorships at random..
https://find-and-update.company-informat...pointments
One of the joys of the British Legal system is being able to con people in plain sight - and there's absolutely nothing they can do about it.
Reply
#10
C C Offline
(Dec 3, 2025 05:37 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote: And here's the link to his posts, CC. He posted the news article about the libel threat from the firm that owes them money. 

https://www.linkedin.com/

Apparently Hortor was severely in debt to a lot of places, if it went from ailing to being collapsed now. One of the responses from its parent company (Pharaoh Capital) seems to suggest it was purely that one director at Hortor that was wildly swinging the bat at Richelieu-Booth, as the ship sank: "From our side, no action [litigation] has been taken, I can assure you of that. Hopefully we can put this to bed."

But then there's the extraneous comment below the article from an individual who seems to be speculating that Pharaoh Capital itself might be revving up (to go at Richelieu-Booth again?). Or maybe, as C2 suggests about the operation, it's just a reference to the next iteration of this overall racket, arising.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Man identifies as a cat during traffic stop (pet hobbies) C C 2 686 Apr 23, 2025 08:00 PM
Last Post: C C
  Men commit heinous crimes, then identify as women after arrested (gender games) C C 1 542 Jun 8, 2022 01:02 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Australia traded away too much liberty (COVID authoritarian games) C C 1 493 Sep 6, 2021 09:26 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Exotic fish surfed 5,000 miles on 2011 tsunami to California (angling sports news) C C 0 608 Dec 23, 2018 02:00 AM
Last Post: C C
  (Angling) The human who got away: Great white shark jumps into fisherman’s boat C C 1 889 May 30, 2017 01:42 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)