Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Social psychology: A lack of political diversity?

#1
C C Offline
http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-k...epublicans

EXCERPT: In January 27, 2011, from a stage in the middle of the San Antonio Convention Center, Jonathan Haidt addressed the participants of the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. The topic was an ambitious one: a vision for social psychology in the year 2020. Haidt began by reviewing the field that he is best known for, moral psychology. Then he threw a curveball. He would, he told the gathering of about a thousand social-psychology professors, students, and post-docs, like some audience participation. By a show of hands, how would those present describe their political orientation? First came the liberals: a “sea of hands,” comprising about eighty per cent of the room, Haidt later recalled. Next, the centrists or moderates. Twenty hands. Next, the libertarians. Twelve hands. And last, the conservatives. Three hands.

Social psychology, Haidt went on, had an obvious problem: a lack of political diversity that was every bit as dangerous as a lack of, say, racial or religious or gender diversity. It discouraged conservative students from joining the field, and it discouraged conservative members from pursuing certain lines of argument. It also introduced bias into research questions, methodology, and, ultimately, publications. The topics that social psychologists chose to study and how they chose to study them, he argued, suffered from homogeneity. The effect was limited, Haidt was quick to point out, to areas that concerned political ideology and politicized notions, like race, gender, stereotyping, and power and inequality. “It’s not like the whole field is undercut, but when it comes to research on controversial topics, the effect is most pronounced,” he later told me. (Haidt has now put his remarks in more formal terms, complete with data, in a paper forthcoming this winter in Behavioral and Brain Sciences.)

Haidt was far from the first to voice concern over the liberal slant in academia, broadly speaking, and in social psychology in particular. He was, however, the first to do it quite so visibly—and the reactions were vocal....
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scotland to ban comedy? (psychology of abusive material) C C 3 46 10 hours ago
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article The fascinating psychology behind alien abduction reports C C 0 66 Jul 26, 2023 10:07 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article What is your brain’s role in creating space and time? (physics & psychology) C C 5 136 Jul 13, 2023 12:22 AM
Last Post: confused2
  Daydreaming's dark side + Men around the world really do lack empathy C C 4 156 Jan 4, 2023 11:12 PM
Last Post: Leigha
  How shops use psychology to influence your buying decisions C C 5 168 Jun 7, 2022 01:51 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Awareness without a sense of self + Psychology perceived as a “feminine” discipline C C 0 83 Jul 21, 2021 10:02 PM
Last Post: C C
  Dreams anticipate future events + Some people lack visual imagery C C 1 163 Jun 9, 2021 04:35 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Psychology research shows ‘water cooler talk’ can have big benefits C C 0 201 Dec 3, 2020 12:53 AM
Last Post: C C
  The Psychology of Online Comments Leigha 6 451 Feb 9, 2020 04:14 AM
Last Post: Leigha
  Paper contends high aims of evolutionary psychology (probably) aren't possible C C 1 175 Jan 17, 2020 12:02 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)