Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc

[DavidMH]

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc
       

My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-

             
                    2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc 



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards,  David Hine.

Email:-                    dhine2999@yahoo.com

=============================================================================================

              Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



              oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring light years as years only.



===========================================================================================

                                                        The "Hubble Tension Issue"

Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,
the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being
directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.

[Syne]

Take your crackpot blog posts elsewhere.

[DavidMH]

Take your crackpot blog posts elsewhere.

My calculations use the Vedic Indian maths system methods that are specifically useful in "predictive cosmology" maths of this type.

[Syne]

Don't care.

[confused2]

pi^21 has a credibility factor of ~1/(pi^21)

[geordief]

pi^21 has a credibility factor of ~1/(pi^21)

Or an in-credibility factor of e^~1/(pi^21

You can follow  his duplicate thread on christianforums with the added bonus of his intro there.

"Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-"

along with his repeated insistence that "goddidit"

He was told to try his luck on a science forum  and you were the lucky choice.

[Syne]

... you were the lucky choice.

Damn our luck.

[C C]

Take your crackpot blog posts elsewhere.

My calculations use the Vedic Indian maths system methods that are specifically useful in "predictive cosmology" maths of this type.

The Alternative Theories subforum is the proper place for such. Depositing it there at least diminishes criticism of it in that regard.

Junk Science is another option, though it obviously means submitting to a negative classification, or acknowledging such.