Research  Physicists find a loophole in Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle without breaking it

#1
C C Offline
https://www.livescience.com/physics-math...reaking-it

EXCERPTS: Physicists have measured both the momentum and position of a particle without breaking Heisenberg’s iconic uncertainty principle.

In quantum mechanics, particles don’t have fixed properties the way everyday objects do. Instead, they exist in a haze of possibilities until they’re measured. And when certain properties are measured, others become uncertain. According to Heisenberg's uncertainty, it’s not possible to know both a particle’s exact position and its exact momentum at the same time.

But a new study has shown a clever loophole around this restriction. Physicists in Australia have demonstrated that by focusing on different quantities, known as modular observables, they can simultaneously measure position and momentum.

[...] In a grid state, the ion’s wave function is spread out into a series of evenly spaced peaks, like the marks on a ruler. The uncertainty is concentrated in the spaces between the marks. The researchers used the peaks as reference points: when a small force nudges the ion, the entire grid pattern shifts slightly. A small sideways shift of the peaks shows up as a change in position, while a tilt in the grid pattern reflects a change in momentum. Because the measurement only cares about the shifts relative to the peaks, both position and momentum changes can be read out at the same time... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Sep 29, 2025 09:42 PM)C C Wrote: https://www.livescience.com/physics-math...reaking-it

EXCERPTS: Physicists have measured both the momentum and position of a particle without breaking Heisenberg’s iconic uncertainty principle.

In quantum mechanics, particles don’t have fixed properties the way everyday objects do. Instead, they exist in a haze of possibilities until they’re measured. And when certain properties are measured, others become uncertain. According to Heisenberg's uncertainty, it’s not possible to know both a particle’s exact position and its exact momentum at the same time.

But a new study has shown a clever loophole around this restriction. Physicists in Australia have demonstrated that by focusing on different quantities, known as modular observables, they can simultaneously measure position and

I[...] n a grid state, the ion’s wave function is spread out into a series of evenly spaced peaks, like the marks on a ruler. The uncertainty is concentrated in the spaces between the marks. The researchers used the peaks as reference points: when a small force nudges the ion, the entire grid pattern shifts slightly. A small sideways shift of the peaks shows up as a change in position, while a tilt in the grid pattern reflects a change in momentum. Because the measurement only cares about the shifts relative to the peaks, both position and momentum changes can be read out at the same time... (MORE - details)

Cool. No physicist here but my layman senses went straight to …..

Sounds like they stopped time or discovered a moment. Perhaps they can measure the length of a moment also? Could this discovery be one step towards understanding time?
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Sep 30, 2025 01:14 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Cool. No physicist here but my layman senses went straight to …..

Sounds like they stopped time or discovered a moment. Perhaps they can measure the length of a moment also? Could this discovery be one step towards understanding time?

I've heard of other "have your cake and eat it, too" experimental tricks in the past. They seem to either fade away or don't alter the usual QM platitude.

"Planck time" is the smallest meaningful unit of time (the interval it would take for a photon to travel a distance equal to one Planck length). If treated as corresponding to something real, then PT would be an insanely shorter moment than a milliseconds-long "giant" interval of our brain consciousness (that's the measurement of change for us). IOW, one of the latter experiential states would have to extend or endure over a string of countless co-existing Planck time changes. That "co-existence" consequence doesn't alter even when moving up to the "slower" level of "routine" subatomic events (measured in rontoseconds).
Reply
#4
confused2 Offline
OP Wrote:..in a grid state, the ion’s wave function is spread out into a series of evenly spaced peaks
I'm thinking that the more you constrain the field of a particle (?) the more it (whatever the field is) behaves like a classical particle.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research Did these physicists just prove true randomness? C C 0 167 Sep 10, 2025 09:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Causal order doesn’t work, physicists find. Now what? C C 1 206 Sep 7, 2025 01:29 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Physicists are afraid of Eric Weinstein -- and they should be (politics of physics) C C 1 543 Jul 17, 2025 02:18 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Physicists just invented a new particle accelerator (Hossenfelder) C C 0 326 Jul 6, 2025 12:22 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Oxford physicists recreate extreme quantum vacuum effects C C 0 407 Jun 5, 2025 07:20 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Physicists measure quantum geometry of electrons for first time C C 0 438 Jan 6, 2025 08:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Physicists find 'quantum embezzlement' could offer infinite source of entanglement C C 0 446 Dec 31, 2024 09:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Breaking boundaries: Researchers isolate quantum coherence in classical light systems C C 0 381 Dec 23, 2024 07:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Quantum physicists discover 'negative time' in strange experiment C C 4 728 Oct 20, 2024 04:04 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article The right chemistry: Breaking down bioplastics' benefits and problems C C 0 475 Sep 15, 2024 10:12 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)