Article  Scary plastic study should probably be recycled + Bhattacharya interview + Race Q

#1
C C Offline
A scary plastic study should probably be recycled
https://www.acsh.org/news/2025/05/04/sca...cled-49453

INTRO: Lately, the press has feasted on a new Lancet article that concludes that about 350,000 of you are going to die yearly from heart disease brought about by long-term ingestion of di-2-ethylhexylphthalate (DEHP), a chemical used to soften plastics. The good news is that the study's data are hardly convincing. Why? We need to look at the good and the bad – the numbers behind the study and how they were used... (MORE - details)


The race question
https://theness.com/neurologicablog/the-race-question/

EXCERPT: As a scientific concept – does race exist? Is it a useful construct, or is it more misleading than useful? I wrote about this question in 2016, and my thinking has evolved a bit since then. My bottom line conclusion has not changed – the answer is, it depends. There is no fully objective answer because this is ultimately a matter of categorization which involves arbitrary choices, such as how to weight different features, how much difference is meaningful, and where to draw lines... (MORE - missing details)


‘It’s been a tough period’: NIH’s new director speaks with Science
https://www.science.org/content/article/...ks-science

INTRO (excerpts): When Jayanta “Jay” Bhattacharya took the helm of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on 1 April, the agency was in turmoil. [...] Last week saw no letup for the former Stanford University health economist: NIH and HHS were finalizing a new policy on foreign research funding, preparing for a big announcement on plans to develop universal flu vaccines, and prepping for the release of the president’s 2026 budget proposal, which seeks to slash NIH by about 40%.

But the day before that budget was released, Bhattacharya sat down for an interview with this Science reporter. He was joined by NIH Chief of Staff Seana Cranston, a former Congressional staffer who replaced John Burklow, a 4-decade NIH communications veteran. The encounter was brief, sometimes confrontational, and even personal.

[..] Below are some excerpts from before our conversation was cut short, edited for brevity and clarity... (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The rat race for research funding delays scientific progress (climate change) C C 0 376 Aug 17, 2024 04:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  ‘Race’, anti-racism and biology C C 0 307 Apr 6, 2024 05:01 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article My letter to the "Washington Post" on race + SC research damaged by retractions C C 0 359 Oct 23, 2023 05:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Why race-based health care is bad medicine: from BiDil to kidney transplants C C 0 325 Mar 30, 2023 05:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Aaronson: demise of Scientific American + Richard Dawkins on race & sex controversy C C 0 322 Jan 6, 2022 06:13 PM
Last Post: C C
  Medical bias: Our research found a way to curb it + What is critical race theory? C C 0 326 Nov 30, 2021 08:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  The Dunning-Kruger Effect is probably not real + The pervsion of science C C 1 431 Dec 28, 2020 08:23 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Why race science is on the rise again C C 1 701 May 31, 2019 11:31 PM
Last Post: Syne
  The unwelcome return of race science C C 76 17,090 Mar 12, 2018 05:13 AM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)