Creative writing and artful observations

Magical Realist Offline
When I remember I forget I am now. When I perceive, I forget I am past. What I remember/perceive becomes the phenomenal and what I forget becomes the objective. I am my objective mind when I'm remembering and I am my objective body when I'm perceiving. The invariant blankness from which I'm remembering and the invariant blankness from which I'm perceiving.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
The universe is everywhere and the mind is everywhere. But not in the same way. The immensity of the universe is due to the objective omnipresencing of localizing space while the eternity of the mind is due to the subjective omnisciencing of instantiating time. The two allnesses inverted yet mirroring each. Perceivability mentates while conceivability incarnates. The medium of extension and the medium of intension merged as one state of conscious beingness.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
The cohesive force of the subjective logic of rationalism matches the adhesive force of the objective causality of empiricism. Both converge remarkably well on the common self-evidencing of the truth. It's why Darwin and Einstein were both right, approaching epistemic consummation from two opposite directions. But what about Hume and Kant?

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1403571618558477
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
Newton's laws only apply to a very specific kind of motion. But there are lots of other kinds of motion going on they don't explain. Like Brownian motion. Or the automotion of machines and living things. Or the motion of massless photons. Or the accelerating motion of our expanding universe. Or the very fundamental and ceaseless motion of Time itself. Or the motion of waves in a medium. Or the motion of charged particles and electrons. Or the percolating motion of the quantum vacuum. Or a Crookes radiometer. Or the motion of a laser pointer across the sky. So we must bear in mind that motion, in its most general sense, is still a largely unexplained and rather mysterious phenomenon.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
The simple motion of your shadow as you walk across the street is not explainable in physical terms. It is not being pushed or pulled by any physical force. It is not being dragged along by your body. It is only an instantiated "not even projected" shaped absence of light caused by your body moving thru the light field. It's like a wake that follows the boat as it pushes thru the water, not really there in any physical sense. It has no identity in itself, no definable properties, no substance, no past or present or future, and therefore cannot be said to be moving at all. Shadows are a striking example of how well non-physical things can mimic the physical world that surrounds them. Our brain is bent on interpreting an anomalous disreality in terms of everything happening around it.
Reply
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
How to presence the concurrent emergence of the self and the other--as the dyadic instantiation of both thru the dialectical interplay of selfing and othering consciousness. The conscious taking-hold-of what is always going on unconsciously. How the static self congeals out of the fluid situationality of strangeness and alienness. Belongingness and homecoming playing off of the concurrent state of disownment and orphanhood. The creative/poetic evocation of self-presencing out of the semantic space of the noumenal and the numinous. Otherness and selfness the timeless superpositioning contrast manifested as deepening awakening experience.

The solution arises out of reciprocal dissolution made possible by the enacted resolution.. The solving and the dissolving emerging out of resolving. We understand the how of the objective construct by subjectively deconstructing it thru purposive envisionment.

Epistemology and ontology two sides of the same coin--an actionable unification of knowing with becoming thru the expressive intentioning of sheer energetic possibilization. What makes known and what makes real are one thing. One timeless happening of truthness and realness. Like a singularity.. One creative process/processing enveloping the objective and subjective-an amalgamating flow of cognitive presencing.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
We can think of the objective physical universe as the territory and the subjective conceptualization of it as the map. The universe and science for instance. Both 3D static domains that ideally, one being what is modeled and the being what models. when superimposed over each, line up and make possible knowing and harmonious living.

But let's set this idea aside and rather see these two ontic states not as a matter of one overlay set over another overlay. Rather let's posit the activity that unites these two opposite states and makes possible their very relation of representing and being represented. And that activity would be navigation itself. Between the physical traveling and the mental mapping lies the phenomenal self-showing of the navigational consciousness itself, which is the self-guiding orienteering mode of being-in-the-world that both knowingly situates and directs the subject.

Likewise this is how the abstract conceptual map and the concrete physical world unite and yet refer to each other, thru that mode of enactive and agential copresencing of each to the other called movement and discovery.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
The triangularization of awakenness..

Think of it. There is only ever what wakes one up, as the noumenal causality of pastness. What is awakened, as the present phenomenal awareness of being here/now. And what is awakened to, as the purposeful and envisioning lure of all futural possibility. This is it. This is the metaphorical encapsulation of what we go thru every morning.

When we are relaxed and just naturally engaging in our lives, there is no given distinction between physical and mental--matter and mind. Everything we are involved and experience is a felt union of conception and perception. Of the sensed and sense-making. The Cartesian schism nowhere makes its appearance. We only ever think about it, if ever, when we sit and ponder things philosophically. IOW, when in fact WE ARE split off from our bodies and our environment inside of some abstract mode of predications and generalizations. This is a big clue here. That we are only generating the mind-body problem for ourselves out of our own concurrent activity of abstract thought. And that it all quickly vanishes when we merge back into the world of being this magical self-moving body that is also conscious and feeling at the same time caught up in constant using and observing and empathizing and projecting.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
New word new concept! Instantiation as the happening of something phenomenally present and self-showing and "distantiation" as the non-happening of something objective and in it-itself and hidden. Presentness and apartness at the same time. The meiosis or splitting apart of the primal ontic state of beingness/noumenality.. Like being in the past and the future at the same time, all tangled up in a present state of non-mediated experiencing and mediated action.

Quantification, discreteness, particularity---all the projections of a consciousness suppressing its own phenomenal experience of qualities, continuity, a priori necessity, and coalescence. Essentially something it has to learn and be trained to do as it isn't humanly natural. Of seriality and order minus the subjective mental action of counting, calculation, intuitively-felt mental agency, inferring, and incremental equation solving. Which results in a static changeless world of things within things within things in themselves tacitly connected and directed and flowing but now only as objectified abstract structurings and systemizations like theories and mathematics and logic and geometry and the laws of physics as well as immaterial ontic objects like forces, fields, continuums, dimensions, quanta, waveforms, and probablistic states. The world of physics basically coming down to an objectifying and de-subjectifying consciousness itself bereft of all experience of time and semantic sense-making and inherent valuing resulting in a static hallucination of an absolutely real physical universe that can only be predictable and explainable by re-invoking all the necessary properties of subjective time it simultaneously ignores in the form of mere objectified timeless abstractions. A solipsism of discrete units without formal unity, components without composition, parts without wholes, meaning nothing in itself because like an automaton it only runs and is directed by itself from the ground up. Unless the future comes along and smashes it to pieces! lol

“On the ostensible exactitude of certain branches of human knowledge, including mathematics. The exactness is a fake.”— Alfred North Whitehead
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Great writing/short stories Magical Realist 0 153 Oct 11, 2026 06:20 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  The wisdom of great creative souls (video clips) Magical Realist 3 659 Sep 24, 2026 06:57 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Davinci's mirror writing stryder 1 1,000 Sep 11, 2022 11:58 PM
Last Post: C C
  The creative value of ugliness C C 0 1,072 Dec 17, 2015 08:13 PM
Last Post: C C
  The Killing Of The Creative Class C C 0 1,107 Feb 9, 2015 08:39 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)