Nov 22, 2024 06:01 AM
(This post was last modified: Nov 22, 2024 06:29 AM by Magical Realist.)
What's the difference? Too often we mistake the two, primarily because when we say "be" or "am" or "is" it is referring to a predicate. I AM a man. I AM a human being. I AM an American. I AM gay. I AM agnostic. And so on and so on. This is our identity, which in the end is hopelessly categorical, always amounting to one being a member of some larger set of identical members. It is always a classification, and as such is generic and empty of any sense of really BEING anything at all. And it is an easy and imitative and a totally fake kind of being.
So what is authentic being? What is it to "be", not something else, but to just
"be" in itself? That is the much harder kind of being because it is inherently undefinable and unclassifiable and uncategorical. It isn't a label we put on and take off depending on where we are or who we're with. Ultimately it is what is unidentifiable in us, because it is what is totally original and unobjective about us. It thus usually dawns on us at some point in our lives as the "not being" of a something or someone. A growing dissatisfaction with our many daily assumed identities. A deepening sense of emptiness and alienation from ourselves. It is the not being of anything we can deliberately become or emulate. In time it is realized to be simply the subjective childlike presence of ourselves to our lives. The totally nascent and creative wellspring from which all our conscious experiences arise. We must learn to live spontaneously and playfully from that inner imaginative source in ourselves, and eschew all the many charades that the world expects us to pantomime in exchange its own continued favor and approval. Being is just being in itself, because in the end there is nothing objective for us to be or become.
So what is authentic being? What is it to "be", not something else, but to just
"be" in itself? That is the much harder kind of being because it is inherently undefinable and unclassifiable and uncategorical. It isn't a label we put on and take off depending on where we are or who we're with. Ultimately it is what is unidentifiable in us, because it is what is totally original and unobjective about us. It thus usually dawns on us at some point in our lives as the "not being" of a something or someone. A growing dissatisfaction with our many daily assumed identities. A deepening sense of emptiness and alienation from ourselves. It is the not being of anything we can deliberately become or emulate. In time it is realized to be simply the subjective childlike presence of ourselves to our lives. The totally nascent and creative wellspring from which all our conscious experiences arise. We must learn to live spontaneously and playfully from that inner imaginative source in ourselves, and eschew all the many charades that the world expects us to pantomime in exchange its own continued favor and approval. Being is just being in itself, because in the end there is nothing objective for us to be or become.
