Research  85% of Americans want animal experiments phased out, new survey shows (ethics)

#1
C C Offline
https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/...ly-2018-85

PRESS RELEASE: A new survey shows that Americans’ attitudes toward experiments on animals have changed significantly in recent years, with the vast majority now favoring phasing out animal experiments in favor or other research methods. The poll was conducted by Morning Consult on Sept. 5, 2024, and included 2,205 adults.

Given the statement, “The US government should commit to a plan to phase out experiments on animals,” 80% agreed or strongly agreed. Similar responses were elicited to the statement, “Government funding should prioritize research methods that do not involve animal testing” and “Animal experimentation should be phased out in favor of more modern research methods” (approximately 85% agreement on both). Responses were generally similar regardless of sex, location, age, or education.

“The results reflect the growing appreciation of animals’ inner lives, since Jane Goodall’s work with chimpanzees in Africa,” said Neal Barnard, MD, president of the Physicians Committee, which commissioned the survey. “Also, we now have research technologies that allow us to harmlessly study human beings in ways that were not possible a few decades ago. The use of animals now seems more antiquated.”

The new survey represents a continued shift away from support for animal research. A 2018 Pew Research Center study found that 47% of Americans were in favor of using animals in scientific research labs and 52% opposed it.

Continued revelations about laboratory abuses have likely fueled the shift. “It may be that public attention given the Physicians Committee’s 2022 public records lawsuit against Elon Musk’s Neuralink monkey experiments and similar unsettling studies has contributed to this change in attitudes,” Dr. Barnard says.

Some parts of the scientific community are lagging behind the public’s shift in attitudes. To address this, the Physicians Committee is working as a part of the Coalition to Illuminate and Address Animal Methods Bias (COLAAB). The coalition has a new website, AnimalMethodsBias.org, that provides researchers guidance and resources aimed at helping them successfully publish nonanimal biomedical research. Many peer reviewers have a preference for animal-based research methods.

“We recently found that half of researchers surveyed had been asked by reviewers to add an animal experiment to their otherwise animal-free study,” says Catharine E. Krebs, PhD, who leads the COLAAB and is a medical research program manager with the Physicians Committee. “The publish-or-perish academic paradigm can pressure researchers to concede these requests—even when they don’t think they’re justified.”

Animal methods bias can cause delays in publication or force authors to resubmit to other journals, often lower-impact ones. The Physicians Committee continues to work with federal agencies, the research community, and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, on practical solutions to progress science toward human-focused methods and away from the use of animals.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article UK will not source solar panels made with slave labor from China (ethics turnabout) C C 0 307 Apr 24, 2025 10:49 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Is climate persuasion a fool’s errand? (environmental ethics) C C 0 339 Mar 9, 2025 06:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Labour voters would rather back Reform UK than the Conservatives, survey has found C C 0 354 Aug 25, 2024 11:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  JB gaffe + 1 in 3 Democrats want Biden out, but Black lawmakers remain loyal C C 2 467 Jul 9, 2024 02:08 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article (UK) Survey shows how out of touch Tories are on sex ed & gender identity in schools C C 2 548 May 18, 2024 12:31 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article (UK) Police investigate virtual sex assault on girl's avatar (VR laws & ethics) C C 3 609 Jan 3, 2024 11:19 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Migrants after Brexit: 'If you don't want me, I don't want you either' C C 1 378 Jun 29, 2023 12:02 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Article The case against animal individualism C C 0 204 Mar 10, 2023 04:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  The ethics of human extinction C C 0 292 Feb 21, 2023 11:27 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientist who edited babies’ genes says he acted ‘too quickly’ (ethics) C C 0 275 Feb 6, 2023 06:55 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)