A question of time: Why AI will never be conscious (Marc Wittmann)

#1
C C Offline
I'd agree that consciousness and the passage of time are the same (the former is the actual source of the latter). But I'm not sure if that's fully or truly what he's saying. And I feel that cognition (identification & understanding dependent on a memory system) -- has everything to do with both the divisions in time as well as any superficially "conflicting" sense of extending over many of them.

Hermann Weyl: "The objective world simply IS, it does not HAPPEN. Only to the gaze of my consciousness, crawling upward along the life line of my body, does a certain section of this world come to life as a fleeting image in space which continuously changes in time." --Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

A Question of Time: Why AI Will Never Be Conscious
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/...-conscious

EXCERPTS: Some scientists and philosophers have the opinion that artificial intelligence could one day become conscious. A computer remains the same physical structure from one moment to the next. A living organism, in contrast, is never the same entity from one moment to the next.

[...] A computer is not part of dynamic nature; it is an object created by man. In an earlier blog, I wrote about how living beings are fundamentally dynamic. ... Every moment we consciously feel is extended in time, describable as a continuous flow of events in the experienced moment of our embodied existence.

[...] In my blog about why most neuroscientific theories of consciousness are wrong, which is based on a scientific article I wrote with Lachlan Kent, I expanded on these necessary temporal properties of consciousness.

[...] Time is the nature of all existence, including the sentient self: Time does not pass outside of us; we are time. We are inseparably part of the world with its temporality.
(MORE - missing details)
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Time consciousness: the missing link in theories of consciousness
https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2021...#253272209
  • Time consciousness should not be: (i) confused with timing of cognitive functions; or (ii) identified with all timescales of temporal integration.

  • Time consciousness extends over multiple seconds, not just a few-hundred milliseconds.

  • Time consciousness is not discrete or point-like (i.e. it does not “happen” at a particular time) but rather field-like (i.e. it contains multiple points that happen at different times but are nevertheless experienced together).

  • Short and discrete “functional moments” that are nonconscious are integrated into longer and continuous “experienced moments” that are conscious.

  • This continuous integration results in the phenomenal sense of temporal flow in conscious experience.

  • Neuroscientific approaches to consciousness do not apply these established principles of time consciousness consistently and so theories of consciousness and time consciousness are potentially incommensurate.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research How your brain detects patterns in the everyday: without conscious thought C C 0 422 Sep 26, 2024 10:01 PM
Last Post: C C
  Why science will never explain phenomenal consciousness (psychology today) C C 1 569 Aug 1, 2024 04:43 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article HSE researchers question the correctness of experiments denying free will C C 5 1,050 Aug 6, 2023 09:04 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Can brain organoids be ‘conscious’? Scientists may soon find out C C 3 603 Dec 24, 2021 04:50 AM
Last Post: stryder
  How conscious are you? C C 1 857 Jan 1, 2016 09:58 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)