Article  An easy way to solve the problem of garbage in scientific journals

#1
C C Offline
https://bigthink.com/the-present/double-...emic-bias/

KEY POINTS: Peer review is the process for screening scientific knowledge, but it has plenty of warts. A recent paper looked at whether more anonymity improves the process by reducing bias. Hiding researchers’ names and universities from reviewers appears to produce a fairer outcome.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Rise & fall of journals + Is male/female divide a social construct? (Richard Dawkins) C C 112 13,132 Nov 12, 2025 12:34 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Research Not all ‘Predators’ are the same: Exploring the spectrum of questionable journals C C 0 418 Feb 18, 2025 07:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Tobacco funded research still appearing in top medical journals C C 0 377 May 31, 2024 02:10 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article We need fewer scientists & fewer journals + Flood of fake science spurs closures C C 0 485 May 15, 2024 04:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  How journals & academic enablers are corrupting reporting on crop biotechnology C C 0 472 Feb 2, 2024 04:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article WHO promotes quackery again + AI use seeps into academic journals C C 1 515 Aug 26, 2023 11:39 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Why science & its journals should remain free of ideology: an example from "Nature" C C 0 493 Mar 23, 2023 02:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Fashionable nonsense of med journals + Phthalates over-hype + Gibberish book chapter C C 0 348 Oct 24, 2021 10:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientists move to strip offensive names from journals, prizes, and more C C 5 1,053 Jul 8, 2020 09:49 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability C C 0 455 Jul 27, 2018 03:12 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)