Apr 5, 2023 07:36 PM
A theory must hold the ingredients of mind, reality and language in order to map the source (mind) to the target (reality).
The theory negates unintelligible reality by placing existence as its content. A formal system such as those existing within today's technology (including computers) lack M (the Metaformal System). With imperfect attempts to advance the creation of computational technology the object-language is lacking in certain ingredients as it currently stands. Thus we require a more powerful computational language. Namely, the Metaformal System as it is so named. As the words "Metaformal System" enter the mind it creates reality and when we read the paper we hold mental expectations of what we hold as "genius"
Quote Reply
Report
Self-referentiality = reality. Langan and I also agree that self-referentiality = language.
The theory negates unintelligible reality by placing existence as its content. A formal system such as those existing within today's technology (including computers) lack M (the Metaformal System). With imperfect attempts to advance the creation of computational technology the object-language is lacking in certain ingredients as it currently stands. Thus we require a more powerful computational language. Namely, the Metaformal System as it is so named. As the words "Metaformal System" enter the mind it creates reality and when we read the paper we hold mental expectations of what we hold as "genius"
Quote Reply
Report
![[Image: 64321.jpg?1676503763]](https://www.religiousforums.com/data/avatars/m/64/64321.jpg?1676503763)
Active Memb
Self-referentiality = reality. Langan and I also agree that self-referentiality = language.