Demonic Forces Explained

#1
Ostronomos Offline
Greetings Daniel,

Your inquiry is appreciated. I will do my best to answer your questions on the ever-elusive phenomenon of demonic forces.

My approach is unique. I not only provide personal accounts but I can actually give logical and mathematical proof of God. I am the Great Genius of Nostradamus prophecy and my dual identity of high and normal serves me well. If you do not believe me that is okay too. I am not demanding anyone's attention.

First, I will say that demonic forces are rebellious entities to all that is Holy. They want to destroy anything and everything God creates. But because they are powerless against Christ, they can't actually physically harm you if your heart is "pure" while calling on the name of God.

Second, I will provide proof of a concept I invented in my other identity, the Great Genius of Nostradamus Prophecy; The higher dimension contains the separation, effecting the non-separation. This means exactly as you might guess. That Mind and Reality appear separate in a lower dimension but become a unified holism in a higher dimension. This results in unbound mind. Unbound mind can be best described as the ability to detect any entity (both good and evil) from another dimension or universe simply because you are now the source of all that exists. A holism. Where your conscious viewing can influence everything from the people around you, to the people on television or other electronic media.

Thank you,

Nicholas.
Reply
#2
Ostronomos Offline
Sand Dancer said: 
Quote:Is there any evidence the Invisible Pink Unicorn can't exist?

We are talking about the Mind = Reality proposition and God mathematics. Not an imaginary entity that has potential to become actualized as all imaginary entities do and can exist in a ghostly state of possibility and become manifest to a degree when the M=R proposition becomes that ultimate reality.


Reply
#3
C C Offline
Philosophical Demons
https://www.informationphilosopher.com/s...ns/demons/

INTRO: Philosophers have often anthropomorphized a problem by imagining a demon who accomplished a task that was difficult to understand but seemed to be possible... (MORE - details)

COVERED: Socrates' demon ..... Bergson's demon ..... Compton's demon ..... Descartes' demon ..... Franfurt's demon ..... Landé's demon ..... Laplace's demon ..... Lewis' demon ..... Maxwell's demon ..... Loschmidt's demon ..... Mendel's demon ..... Mill's demon ..... Nietzsche's demon ..... Peirce's demon ..... Popper's demon ..... Russell's demon ..... Wiener's demon


The New Evil Demon Problem
https://iep.utm.edu/evil-new/

The new evil demon problem first emerged in the literature as a problem for reliabilist theories of epistemic justification...
Reply
#4
Magical Realist Offline
The Tibetan Book of the Dead exhorts one to see all demons as aspects of oneself in order to move on to the next level. Psychologist Carl Jung would say our demons are part of our repressed shadow in need of being accepted and reintegrated into the being of our Higher Self.
Reply
#5
Yazata Offline
Who are Daniel and Sand Dancer? Where is this text copied from? Who wrote it?
Reply
#6
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Feb 18, 2023 10:14 PM)Yazata Wrote: Who are Daniel and Sand Dancer? Where is this text copied from? Who wrote it?

A quick Google & I think this is the Sand Dancer in question. Thank god the sun’s coming out tomorrow

https://www.religiousforums.com/members/...cer.42048/

Not sure what Ostro is up to.
Reply
#7
Yazata Offline
Thanks Zinjanthropos. I post over there sometimes, but haven't in the last couple of weeks.

I don't know what Ostro is doing either, or why he drags an argument from another discussion board over here.
Reply
#8
Ostronomos Offline
(Feb 19, 2023 09:20 PM)Yazata Wrote: Thanks Zinjanthropos. I post over there sometimes, but haven't in the last couple of weeks.

I don't know what Ostro is doing either, or why he drags an argument from another discussion board over here.

Hello Yazata,

I am more than happy to answer questions and stimulate thought on this most philosophical of subjects. That is why I do so.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)