Posts: 885
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2022
Kornee
Jan 17, 2023 03:56 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 03:57 AM by Kornee.)
Wow. I seem to have inadvertently pressed a button. No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Believe it or not, I was motivated by purely factual errors - not (evidently presumed) misogyny. OK? As an aside, rampant androgyny is rather well supported by Hollywood/MSM/PC politicians in general.
Just how that has happened is another story altogether. Cheers and have a nice day.
Posts: 17,183
Threads: 10,762
Joined: Oct 2014
C C
Jan 17, 2023 04:20 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 04:29 AM by C C.)
(Jan 17, 2023 03:56 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Then post anything about Sabine Hossenfelder that you randomly come across, since her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.)
Posts: 885
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2022
Kornee
Jan 17, 2023 04:31 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 04:32 AM by Kornee.)
(Jan 17, 2023 04:20 AM)C C Wrote: (Jan 17, 2023 03:56 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Then post anything about Sabine Hossenfelder that you randomly come across, since her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.) Why? Sabine posts almost purely on physics related topics. She made an error on a physics related topic. I posted on that.
Where is the logic in *regularly* extending that to totally unrelated topics?
Oh, and btw, my last post comments extended to such only because of the tone of your earlier post here. I can read between the lines. And as you all know, I have no interest in winning friendships/allies. Just truth.
Posts: 17,183
Threads: 10,762
Joined: Oct 2014
C C
Jan 17, 2023 04:46 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 04:50 AM by C C.)
(Jan 17, 2023 04:31 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.)
Posts: 885
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2022
Kornee
Jan 17, 2023 04:58 AM
(Jan 17, 2023 04:46 AM)C C Wrote: (Jan 17, 2023 04:31 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.) If you say so CC. Bye bye for now now.
Posts: 17,183
Threads: 10,762
Joined: Oct 2014
C C
Jan 17, 2023 05:03 AM
(Jan 17, 2023 04:31 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.)
Posts: 885
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2022
Kornee
Jan 17, 2023 05:07 AM
(Jan 17, 2023 05:03 AM)C C Wrote: (Jan 17, 2023 04:31 AM)Kornee Wrote: No CC, imho it would make no sense to dump critiques of unrelated scientist's real or imagined gaffes in a thread specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder.
Her name seems to be the only thing in the title of this thread that you're capable of apprehending (with respect to what it specifically concerns.) So sorry. Guess I should have phrased it as 'specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder's take on mostly physics related news stuff'.
There - Is that reworked phraseology now acceptable?
Posts: 17,183
Threads: 10,762
Joined: Oct 2014
C C
Jan 17, 2023 05:13 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 05:16 AM by C C.)
(Jan 17, 2023 05:07 AM)Kornee Wrote: So sorry. Guess I should have phrased it as 'specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder's take on mostly physics related news stuff'.
There - Is that reworked phraseology now acceptable?
Here's an example of someone who can make the distinction between the two. But you can continue to play here with her stand-alone or different series videos (posted on other forums to boot), if you're still cognitively challenged.
Sabine Hossenfelder's Weekly Science Update Videos
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13154-...l#pid54403
Posts: 885
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2022
Kornee
Jan 17, 2023 05:25 AM
(Jan 17, 2023 05:13 AM)C C Wrote: (Jan 17, 2023 05:07 AM)Kornee Wrote: So sorry. Guess I should have phrased it as 'specifically devoted to Sabine Hossenfelder's take on mostly physics related news stuff'.
There - Is that reworked phraseology now acceptable?
Here's an example of someone who can make the distinction between the two. But you can continue to play here with her stand-alone or different series videos (posted on other forums to boot), if you're still cognitively challenged.
Sabine Hossenfelder's Weekly Science Update Videos
https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13154-...l#pid54403 Cognitively challenged? That needs objectively unpacking - given my cumulative past input on that issue.
As for your link - great, except Yazata will probably freely admit he is rather weak on physics and where errors in such occurs and matters.
So, down to the nitty gritty of relevancy/appropriateness of my post #14 here. Was it actually either unfair or inappropriate? We all (hopefully) agree it was factually correct.
This is becoming such a ding dong battle of wits not facts I sense. Subjectively of course. 
Posts: 17,183
Threads: 10,762
Joined: Oct 2014
C C
Jan 17, 2023 05:55 AM
(This post was last modified: Jan 17, 2023 05:56 AM by C C.)
(Jan 17, 2023 05:25 AM)Kornee Wrote: Cognitively challenged? That needs objectively unpacking - given my cumulative past input on that issue. As for your link - great, except Yazata will probably freely admit he is rather weak on physics and where errors in such occurs and matters...
Absolutely unbelievable. You still can't see the "science news" label on the left side of the first video below that distinguishes it from the other kind below it? You still have no clue as to what this thread (was formerly) specifically devoted to? I thought you were pretending.
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/zVD99JF-dfE
- - - - - -
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Zklo4Z1SqkE
|
