Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Big Bang didn't happen: What do the James Webb images really show? + TV set & the BB

#1
C C Offline
How to prove the Big Bang with an old TV set
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/...ng-old-tv/

KEY TAKEAWAYS: One of the wildest predictions of the Big Bang, which asserts that today's Universe arose from an early, hot, dense state, is that there should be a leftover, low-energy bath of radiation permeating the whole of space. When you calculate what the wavelength of that radiation ought to be today, many billions of years later, it turns out to be just right to interact with an old television set's "rabbit ear" antennae. If you turn an old TV set to channel 03, about 1% of that static-like "snow" you see originates from the Big Bang itself, enabling you to "discover" the Big Bang with an old TV set under the right conditions.. (MORE - missing details)


The Big Bang didn't happen: What do the James Webb images really show?
https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-did...-auid-2215

INTRO (Eric Lerner): To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old.  Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”

Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”

The delusions of cosmology min The Delusions of Cosmology Read more
It is not too complicated to explain why these too small, too smooth, too old and too numerous galaxies are completely incompatible with the Big Bang hypothesis. Let’s begin with “too small”. If the universe is expanding, a strange optical illusion must exist. Galaxies (or any other objects) in expanding space do not continue to look smaller and smaller with increasing distance. Beyond a certain point, they start looking larger and larger. (This is because their light is supposed to have left them when they were closer to us.) This is in sharp contrast to ordinary, non-expanding space, where objects look smaller in proportion to their distance.

Smaller and smaller is exactly what the JWST images show. Even galaxies with greater luminosity and mass than our own Milky Way galaxy appear in these images to be two to three times smaller than in similar images observed with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), and the new galaxies have redshifts which are also two to three times greater.

This is not at all what is expected with an expanding universe, but it is just exactly what I and my colleague Riccardo Scarpa predicted based on a non-expanding universe, with redshift proportional to distance... (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The 1st life in the universe could have formed seconds after the Big Bang C C 1 123 Dec 13, 2023 10:22 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article The Big Bang Theory is true. Deal with it. C C 0 72 Sep 18, 2023 03:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Evolution didn't make us human, culture did C C 2 115 Dec 21, 2022 07:45 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  The Big Bang bust-up: The HTLGI festival in London debates the origin of the universe C C 0 136 Oct 5, 2022 03:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Erwin Schrödinger & the conscious universe + James Lovelock dies (Gaia hypothesis) C C 2 137 Jul 28, 2022 08:41 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Researchers published a theory that they set the upper limit for quantizing time C C 1 154 Jun 29, 2020 03:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Superdeterminism: The path we didn't take C C 0 198 Dec 17, 2019 07:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Alternatives to the Big Bang theory C C 3 1,267 Oct 24, 2015 09:40 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)