Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A new theory for systems that defy Newton’s third law

#1
C C Offline
https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-new-the...-20211111/

INTRO: Newton’s third law tells us that for every action, there’s an equal reaction going the opposite way. It’s been reassuring us for 400 years, explaining why we don’t fall through the floor (the floor pushes up on us too), and why paddling a boat makes it glide through water. When a system is in equilibrium, no energy goes in or out and such reciprocity is the rule. Mathematically, these systems are elegantly described with statistical mechanics, the branch of physics that explains how collections of objects behave. This allows researchers to fully model the conditions that give rise to phase transitions in matter, when one state of matter transforms into another, such as when water freezes.

But many systems exist and persist far from equilibrium. Perhaps the most glaring example is life itself. We’re kept out of equilibrium by our metabolism, which converts matter into energy. A human body that settles into equilibrium is a dead body.

In such systems, Newton’s third law becomes moot. Equal-and-opposite falls apart. “Imagine two particles,” said Vincenzo Vitelli, a condensed matter theorist at the University of Chicago, “where A interacts with B in a different way than how B interacts with A.” Such nonreciprocal relationships show up in systems like neuron networks and particles in fluids and even, on a larger scale, in social groups. Predators eat prey, for example, but prey doesn’t eat its predators.

For these unruly systems, statistical mechanics falls short in representing phase transitions. Out of equilibrium, nonreciprocity dominates. Flocking birds show how easily the law is broken: Because they can’t see behind them, individuals change their flight patterns in response to the birds ahead of them. So bird A doesn’t interact with bird B in the same way that bird B interacts with bird A; it’s not reciprocal. Cars barreling down a highway or stuck in traffic are similarly nonreciprocal. Engineers and physicists who work with metamaterials — which get their properties from structure, rather than substance — have harnessed nonreciprocal elements to design acoustic, quantum and mechanical devices.

Many of these systems are kept out of equilibrium because individual constituents have their own power source — ATP for cells, gas for cars. But all these extra energy sources and mismatched reactions make for a complex dynamical system beyond the reach of statistical mechanics. How can we analyze phases in such ever-changing systems?

Vitelli and his colleagues see an answer in mathematical objects called exceptional points. Generally, an exceptional point in a system is a singularity, a spot where two or more characteristic properties become indistinguishable and mathematically collapse into one. At an exceptional point, the mathematical behavior of a system differs dramatically from its behavior at nearby points, and exceptional points often describe curious phenomena in systems — like lasers — in which energy is gained and lost continuously.

Now the team has found that these exceptional points also control phase transitions in nonreciprocal systems. Exceptional points aren’t new; physicists and mathematicians have studied them for decades in a variety of settings. But they’ve never been associated so generally with this type of phase transition. “That’s what no one has thought about before, using these in the context of nonequilibrium systems,” said the physicist Cynthia Reichhardt of Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. “So you can bring all the machinery that we already have about exceptional points to study these systems.”

The new work also draws connections among a range of areas and phenomena that, for years, haven’t seemed to have anything to say to each other. “I believe their work represents rich territory for mathematical development,” said Robert Kohn of the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University... (MORE)
Reply
#2
Kornee Offline
Absurd title is alone enough to avoid further reading. The kindest interpretation is the author is genuinely ignorant of the fact Newton's 3rd law cannot ever be violated. Ever!
Notwithstanding some claims it can. These generally involve radiation reaction and/or radiative momentum flux being conveniently excised from the proper, full balance analysis.
Conflating the 3rd Law with all the other listed disparate scenarios having little or absolutely no logical connection at all to the 3rd Law, is just a pathetic mix of click-bait come grant-grasping hype.
Although hype is too lenient a word in this case.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Quantum field theory explained -- understanding the most successful theory in science C C 1 158 Aug 25, 2022 06:28 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  How and why fireflies flash in time can illuminate the physics of complex systems C C 0 79 Sep 27, 2021 05:20 PM
Last Post: C C
  Cracks appear in 2nd law of thermodynamics + Centuries-old theory bypassed to canc... C C 0 408 Oct 28, 2020 11:07 PM
Last Post: C C
  Dissolving the Fermi Paradox + An infinite universe of number systems C C 2 174 Oct 21, 2020 11:06 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  String theory & number theory share + Why string theory is both a dream & a nightmare C C 0 354 Mar 4, 2020 01:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Against string theory + Parasites in science have contributed zero to string theory C C 0 525 Jun 7, 2016 07:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Evidence suggests subatomic particles could defy the standard model C C 0 572 Aug 27, 2015 11:44 PM
Last Post: C C
  String theory: From Newton to Einstein and beyond C C 0 660 Oct 28, 2014 04:57 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)