Healthy lifestyle may help mitigate high genetic risk of cancer (statistics)

#1
C C Offline
https://www.aacr.org/about-the-aacr/news...of-cancer/

RELEASE: Healthy lifestyle factors such as abstinence from smoking and drinking, low body mass index, and exercise correlated with decreased cancer incidence, even in individuals with a high genetic risk.

As genetic research continues to uncover loci, or areas in DNA, with specific changes that influence cancer risk, researchers can define polygenic risk scores (PRS) -- personalized estimates of an individual's cancer risk -- based on a patient's unique combination of these changes. However, most PRS are generated for a specific cancer type, rather than for overall cancer risk.

"A PRS indicating risk of a certain cancer is important but not enough," Jin said. "We tried to create an indicator -- the cancer polygenic risk score (CPRS) -- to measure the genetic risk of cancer as a whole."

Jin and colleagues calculated individual PRS for 16 cancers in men and 18 cancers in women, using available data from genome-wide association studies. They then used statistical methods to combine these scores into a single measure of cancer risk, based on the relative proportion of each cancer type in the general population. Separate CPRS were generated for men and women.

To validate their CPRS, the researchers utilized genotype information from 202,842 men and 239,659 women from the UK Biobank, a cohort of general-population participants recruited from England, Scotland, and Wales between 2006 and 2009, and calculated a CPRS for each individual.

UK Biobank participants were surveyed upon enrollment for various lifestyle factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption, body mass index, exercise habits, and typical diet. Based on these factors, Jin and colleagues classified each patient as having an unfavorable (zero to one healthy factors), intermediate (two to three healthy factors), or favorable (four to five healthy factors) overall lifestyle.

Patients with the highest quintile CPRS were nearly twice as likely (for men) and 1.6 times as likely (for women) to have a cancer diagnosis by their most recent follow-up, in 2015 or 2016. Notably, 97 percent of patients in the study had a high genetic risk (top quintile) of at least one cancer type. "This suggests that almost everyone is susceptible to at least one type of cancer," Jin said. "It further indicates the importance of adherence to a healthy lifestyle for everyone."

Patients with an unfavorable lifestyle and the highest quintile genetic risk were 2.99 times (in men) and 2.38 times (in women) more likely to develop cancer than those with a favorable lifestyle and the lowest quintile of genetic risk.

Among patients with high genetic risk, the five-year cancer incidence was 7.23 percent in men and 5.77 percent in women with an unfavorable lifestyle, compared with 5.51 percent in men and 3.69 percent in women with a favorable lifestyle. The decreased percentages are comparable to the cancer risk in individuals with intermediate genetic risk, Jin said. Similar trends were observed in all genetic risk categories, suggesting that patients could benefit from a healthy lifestyle regardless of genetic risk.

Limitations of this study include the fact that only the strongest genetic risk loci were included in the individual PRS, which disregards the influence of loci with weaker effects. Researchers also noted an imbalance in the number of loci included between different cancer types, which can potentially skew their individual impact.

PAPER: http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0836
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Research More seniors are dying after falls: Prescription drugs & OTC medications (statistics) C C 2 212 Sep 10, 2025 02:51 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Labour can't stop boats? New migrant record on Home Secretary's 1st day? (statistics) C C 0 131 Sep 8, 2025 04:41 AM
Last Post: C C
  China: How do you lose 100 million people? (statistics) C C 2 552 May 27, 2025 07:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article What would it take to 'alarm' Americans about climate change? (statistics) C C 0 368 Jul 24, 2024 06:22 PM
Last Post: C C
  You're significantly more likely to die on your birthday. Here's why (statistics) C C 0 326 Jul 18, 2024 05:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Global population collapse isn't sci-fi anymore (demographic statistics) C C 0 421 Mar 11, 2024 05:36 PM
Last Post: C C
  Global study unveils problematic use of porn (survey, statistics) C C 0 385 Mar 6, 2024 05:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Why does nature always follow a Bell curve? (statistics) C C 0 385 Feb 19, 2024 01:40 AM
Last Post: C C
  Research Losing sleep over killings of unarmed Black individuals by police (statistics) C C 1 397 Feb 7, 2024 12:24 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Article If Earth is average, we should find ET life within 60 light-years (statistics) C C 0 334 Sep 29, 2023 08:56 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)