Quantum entanglement has now been directly observed at a larger macroscopic scale

#1
C C Offline
https://www.sciencealert.com/quantum-ent...opic-scale

EXCERPT: . . . "If you analyze the position and momentum data for the two drums independently, they each simply look hot," says physicist John Teufel, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the US. "But looking at them together, we can see that what looks like random motion of one drum is highly correlated with the other, in a way that is only possible through quantum entanglement."

While there's nothing to say that quantum entanglement can't happen with macroscopic objects, before now it was thought that the effects weren't noticeable at larger scales – or perhaps that the macroscopic scale was governed by another set of rules.

This new research suggests that's not the case. In fact, the same quantum rules apply here, too, and can actually be seen as well. Researchers vibrated the tiny drum membranes using microwave photons and kept them kept in a synchronized state in terms of their position and velocities.

To prevent outside interference, a common problem with quantum states, the drums were cooled, entangled, and measured in separate stages while inside a cryogenically chilled enclosure. The states of the drums are then encoded in a reflected microwave field that works in a similar way to radar.

Previous studies have also reported on macroscopic quantum entanglement, but the new research goes further: All of the necessary measurements were recorded rather than inferred, and the entanglement was generated in a deterministic, non-random way... (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
"one-fifth the width of a human hair" is hardly what most people would consider macroscopic, seeing as you'd need a microscope to see them.
Reply
#3
stryder Offline
(May 9, 2021 12:11 AM)Syne Wrote: "one-fifth the width of a human hair" is hardly what most people would consider macroscopic, seeing as you'd need a microscope to see them.
I don't think it was the "size" that was important to researchers but the collation of the reaction. It's still termed a macroscopic reaction when it's involving more than one event to generate the composite result.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article There is no Copenhagen interpretation + Negative time observed in photon-atom action C C 1 374 Sep 25, 2025 05:27 AM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Article Planck scale not a limit? + Secrets of time? + Failure to eliminate black holes? C C 0 459 Jun 12, 2025 06:11 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Could an extra time dimension reconcile quantum entanglement with local causality? C C 0 417 Apr 28, 2025 04:07 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research A symphony in quantum + New class of quantum states in graphene discovered C C 0 551 Feb 10, 2025 06:53 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research QM entanglement within protons + 25-year update on “Millennium problems" in physics C C 0 483 Jan 8, 2025 08:24 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research Physicists find 'quantum embezzlement' could offer infinite source of entanglement C C 0 653 Dec 31, 2024 09:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research How fast is quantum entanglement? C C 0 1,148 Oct 22, 2024 06:25 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Maths: nature or human construct? + Entanglement + Boltzmann brains & epistemology C C 0 524 Jul 31, 2024 05:16 PM
Last Post: C C
  Research The new math of how large-scale order emerges C C 0 539 Jun 12, 2024 03:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Quantum entanglement visualized for the first time ever C C 1 467 Sep 3, 2023 10:02 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)