Posts: 16,479
Threads: 3,002
Joined: Oct 2014
Magical Realist
Jun 30, 2026 04:53 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 30, 2026 04:55 AM by Magical Realist.)
Not even his own gerry-rigged SCOTUS would hear is case. Fucking rapist.
"A jury found Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room in the 1990s, then defamed her after she went public with her story, awarding her $5 million. Trump appealed the verdict all the way up through the courts. Not one Supreme Court justice voted to even hear his case, including the three justices Trump appointed himself. Combined with a separate $83.3 million defamation verdict against him, Trump now owes Carroll over $100 million once interest is included.
Trump’s response? Calling it a ‘fake case,’ claiming he’s never met her, and calling it ‘weaponization and lawfare’ against him. Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, responded, ‘His multiple efforts to appeal that verdict have all failed and today’s ruling ends his quest to avoid accountability for his actions.’
Posts: 13,873
Threads: 249
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Jun 30, 2026 05:03 AM
The jury did not find that Trump raped her. Learn what words mean.
Posts: 16,479
Threads: 3,002
Joined: Oct 2014
Magical Realist
Jun 30, 2026 05:05 AM
Google AI:
"A rapist is a person who forces or coerces another individual to engage in sexual intercourse or any other sexual act without their consent."
Posts: 13,873
Threads: 249
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Jun 30, 2026 05:39 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 30, 2026 05:39 AM by Syne.)
Now trying looking up New York law. You know, the jurisdiction of the case. He wasn't even found guilty. He was found "liable" in a civil suit, not "guilty" in a criminal trial. There's a difference. Civil suits do not add to your criminal record.
Literacy is amazing!
Posts: 16,479
Threads: 3,002
Joined: Oct 2014
Magical Realist
Jun 30, 2026 05:57 AM
Quote:Now trying looking up New York law.
LOL He was proven guilty of sexual assault by the courts. You can't deny it.
Posts: 13,873
Threads: 249
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Jun 30, 2026 06:10 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 30, 2026 06:11 AM by Syne.)
Not "proven guilty" nor of "sexual assault."
Too bad you don't understand basic law.
Literacy is amazing!
Posts: 16,479
Threads: 3,002
Joined: Oct 2014
Magical Realist
Jun 30, 2026 06:12 AM
(This post was last modified: Jun 30, 2026 06:26 AM by Magical Realist.)
Yes he was liar. That's why the Supreme Court wouldn't hear it. They knew he was guilty. Either he did it or he didn't do it. And the verdict is that he did. Piece of shit that he is.
Posts: 13,873
Threads: 249
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Jun 30, 2026 06:57 AM
No, you just don't understand basic law.
Liable in a civil suit, which is what SCOTUS refuse to hear an appeal to, is not the same as guilt in a criminal trial. Neither the original suit, nor the SCOTUS refusal confer criminal guilt.
Posts: 16,479
Threads: 3,002
Joined: Oct 2014
Magical Realist
Jun 30, 2026 05:06 PM
Quote:No, you just don't understand basic law.
Liable in a civil suit, which is what SCOTUS refuse to hear an appeal to, is not the same as guilt in a criminal trial.
Yes it is. He was found guilty of sexual assault which is why he has to pay his victim 5 million.
Posts: 13,873
Threads: 249
Joined: Aug 2016
Syne
Jun 30, 2026 08:13 PM
(Jun 30, 2026 05:06 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: Quote:No, you just don't understand basic law.
Liable in a civil suit, which is what SCOTUS refuse to hear an appeal to, is not the same as guilt in a criminal trial.
Yes it is. He was found guilty of sexual assault which is why he has to pay his victim 5 million.
Again, "guilty" is something found in a criminal case. "Liable" is what's found in a civil case.
Basic law that you can't seem to comprehend, no matter how many times you're told.
But if you're determined to remain completely ignorant, that's on you.
|
