Creative writing and artful observations

Magical Realist Offline
Quote:Yeah, we're not taking a gay man tell us what women think seriously.

Then don't ask me a question..
Reply
Syne Offline
(Apr 11, 2026 02:59 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, we're not taking a gay man tell us what women think seriously.

Then don't ask me a question..

I didn't ask you anything about women. And it seems this is your excuse to dodge the questions I did actually ask. 9_9
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
I'm free to knowledgeably discuss women whenever I consider them relevant to my point. Welcome to the world of free speech phobe..
Reply
Syne Offline
(Apr 11, 2026 03:25 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: I'm free to knowledgeably discuss women whenever I consider them relevant to my point. Welcome to the world of free speech phobe..

No one ever said you couldn't or shouldn't. I said there's no reason to take it seriously.

Again, still dodging the actual questions I asked. 9_9
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
Quote:No one ever said you couldn't or shouldn't. I said there's no reason to take it seriously.

You had to attack my sexual orientation as an excuse to dismiss my point because it hit home. Which pretty much makes you a disingenuous and deflective piece of shit. Again, don't ask a question if you can't handle the answer.
Reply
Syne Offline
(Apr 11, 2026 03:44 AM)Magical Realist Wrote:
Quote:No one ever said you couldn't or shouldn't. I said there's no reason to take it seriously.

You had to attack my sexual orientation as an excuse to dismiss my point because it hit home. Which pretty much makes you a disingenuous and deflective piece of shit. Again, don't ask a question if you can't handle the answer.

No, I mentioned you being gay because it is directly relevant to you have any experience or knowledge of heterosexual dynamics.

Still can't manage to answer the two simple question I actually asked, huh? Still whining about a comment (not even a question).

You're protesting far too much. Rolleyes
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
The Universe isn't just up in outer space. The Universe actually begins at the tip of your nose. It is everything you see around you and everywhere you go. Houses and signs and streets and trees and cars and buildings and clouds. All of this is the Universe too. It's just the parts we have gotten used to. But it is still all made of stardust. Even ourselves. So if you want to explore the Universe you don't need a spaceship. Just walk out your front door and look around you!
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
If you were some sort of nonphysical being existing outside of the spacetime continuum and you wanted to communicate with a human being, what could you do? The law of causal closure is quite rigid. Everything that happens in the physical world must have a physical cause. So any attempt at causing something that wasn't already going to happen would be a no-no.

But what if you could manipulate not WHAT happens but WHEN it happens, simply recalibrating the times in which the fated events would happen? Then you could possibly send special coded messages in things that happened at the same time. Synchronicities ...serendipities...mental premonitions. All events that would never violate causal closure, but could nonetheless carry messages to the human being that you are there and watching. Messages, as it were, in bottles washing up ashore on the beaches of a despondent and earth-stranded humanity.
Reply
Syne Offline
No, in a hard causal closure regime, even changing the timing of events is interjecting an external cause, especially if orchestrated to encode information from an extra-universal source. You'd have to accept a weak causal closure effectively equivalent to causal completeness to allow anything that could transmit information to effect events in the physical world from beyond it.
Reply
Magical Realist Offline
Not if you have two causal streams of events happening concurrently that are essentially random relative to each other, like your own wandering thoughts and say a TV on in the background. The timing of coincidental words and themes would thus be acausal, happening in strict linear physical causation in their respective streams but also happening indeterminately relative to each other and thus allowing the entity to send messages in these causally open spaces.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Davinci's mirror writing stryder 1 797 Sep 11, 2022 11:58 PM
Last Post: C C
  The creative value of ugliness C C 0 903 Dec 17, 2015 08:13 PM
Last Post: C C
  The Killing Of The Creative Class C C 0 926 Feb 9, 2015 08:39 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)