The Starlinks that scrubbed last night went today. Good news and bad news.
Good news is that the new batch of 60 Starlinks are in what looks like a good orbit, awaiting deployment. They just conducted a short second stage burn to adjust the orbit and the SpaceX feed just called out "nominal orbit insertion".
Bad news is that B1059 failed to land and was lost. I didn't see it, but many people said that the entry burn didn't look right. The SpaceX feed stopped showing telemetry right after that. Then they switched to showing video from OCISLY. That was interesting since several seagulls were on the deck. Then there was a glow of light off-camera and the seagulls hardly moved. Believed that B1059 came down in the water some distance from OCISLY. Don't know how fast it was going when it hit or whether the glow was the landing burn or an explosion when it hit the water.
As we mourn its loss, we need to remember that B1059 successfully put six payloads into orbit, which is good service for any rocket.
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/stat...7427751941
Edit: Here's a video clip of the entry burn shutdown. There seems to have been a plume of bright flame to the right continuing after the three reentry engines were supposed to have shut down. Did one of the three engines fail to shut down and was still running? Did one engine explode and was spraying burning propellant? I don't know, but the SpaceX telemetry should make that clear to their engineers.
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/stat...2023565313
Edit: Michael Baylor (the guy behind nextspaceflight.com) is always looking on the bright side and writes, "That booster saved SpaceX from a seagull barbeque public relations nightmare. B1059.6 was an honorable sacrifice."
https://twitter.com/nextspaceflight/stat...1490435072
Several seagulls were standing on OCISLY's landing deck immediately before B1059 was due to land. The camera aimed at the deck showed a sudden bright glow from off camera to the right, and the birds were obviously aware of it but barely flinched. Then a few moments later they leaped into the air simultaneously (but quickly returned). That suggests to me that a loud sound had arrived. Which suggests to me that B1059 might have hit hard and exploded. Which in turn suggests to me that it hitting some distance from OCISLY was intentional, if the software was aware that it had no chance of completing the landing and might damage OCISLY if it tried. B1059's last selfless act was to divert.
Good news is that the new batch of 60 Starlinks are in what looks like a good orbit, awaiting deployment. They just conducted a short second stage burn to adjust the orbit and the SpaceX feed just called out "nominal orbit insertion".
Bad news is that B1059 failed to land and was lost. I didn't see it, but many people said that the entry burn didn't look right. The SpaceX feed stopped showing telemetry right after that. Then they switched to showing video from OCISLY. That was interesting since several seagulls were on the deck. Then there was a glow of light off-camera and the seagulls hardly moved. Believed that B1059 came down in the water some distance from OCISLY. Don't know how fast it was going when it hit or whether the glow was the landing burn or an explosion when it hit the water.
As we mourn its loss, we need to remember that B1059 successfully put six payloads into orbit, which is good service for any rocket.
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/stat...7427751941
Edit: Here's a video clip of the entry burn shutdown. There seems to have been a plume of bright flame to the right continuing after the three reentry engines were supposed to have shut down. Did one of the three engines fail to shut down and was still running? Did one engine explode and was spraying burning propellant? I don't know, but the SpaceX telemetry should make that clear to their engineers.
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/stat...2023565313
Edit: Michael Baylor (the guy behind nextspaceflight.com) is always looking on the bright side and writes, "That booster saved SpaceX from a seagull barbeque public relations nightmare. B1059.6 was an honorable sacrifice."
https://twitter.com/nextspaceflight/stat...1490435072
Several seagulls were standing on OCISLY's landing deck immediately before B1059 was due to land. The camera aimed at the deck showed a sudden bright glow from off camera to the right, and the birds were obviously aware of it but barely flinched. Then a few moments later they leaped into the air simultaneously (but quickly returned). That suggests to me that a loud sound had arrived. Which suggests to me that B1059 might have hit hard and exploded. Which in turn suggests to me that it hitting some distance from OCISLY was intentional, if the software was aware that it had no chance of completing the landing and might damage OCISLY if it tried. B1059's last selfless act was to divert.