Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Science Isn’t Broken

#1
C C Offline
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/scie...nt-broken/

EXCERPT: [...] From 2001 to 2009, the number of retractions issued in the scientific literature rose tenfold. It remains a matter of debate whether that’s because misconduct is increasing or is just easier to root out. Fang suspects, based on his experiences as a journal editor, that misconduct has become more common. Others aren’t so sure. [...]

If you follow the headlines, your confidence in science may have taken a hit lately.

Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.

Scientific journals? Not exactly a badge of legitimacy, given that the "International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology" recently accepted for publication a paper titled “Get Me Off Your F###ing Mailing List,” whose text was nothing more than those seven words, repeated over and over for 10 pages. Two other journals allowed an engineer posing as Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel to publish a paper, “Fuzzy, Homogeneous Configurations.”

Revolutionary findings? Possibly fabricated. In May, a couple of University of California, Berkeley, grad students discovered irregularities in Michael LaCour’s influential paper suggesting that an in-person conversation with a gay person could change how people felt about same-sex marriage. The journal Science retracted the paper shortly after, when LaCour’s co-author could find no record of the data.

Taken together, headlines like these might suggest that science is a shady enterprise that spits out a bunch of dressed-up nonsense. But I’ve spent months investigating the problems hounding science, and I’ve learned that the headline-grabbing cases of misconduct and fraud are mere distractions. The state of our science is strong, but it’s plagued by a universal problem: Science is hard — really f###ing hard.

If we’re going to rely on science as a means for reaching the truth — and it’s still the best tool we have — it’s important that we understand and respect just how difficult it is to get a rigorous result. I could pontificate about all the reasons why science is arduous, but instead I’m going to let you experience one of them for yourself. Welcome to the wild world of p-hacking.....
Reply
#2
Secular Sanity Offline
P-hacking?  That’s an interesting term.  I’ve never heard it before. 

Data dredging?  Hmm...I’ll have to read up on it.

Thanks, CC!
Reply
#3
Yazata Offline
(Aug 20, 2015 11:52 PM)C C Wrote: EXCERPT: [...] From 2001 to 2009, the number of retractions issued in the scientific literature rose tenfold. It remains a matter of debate whether that’s because misconduct is increasing or is just easier to root out. Fang suspects, based on his experiences as a journal editor, that misconduct has become more common. Others aren’t so sure. [...]

Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.

Scientific journals? Not exactly a badge of legitimacy, given that the "International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology" recently accepted for publication a paper titled “Get Me Off Your F###ing Mailing List,” whose text was nothing more than those seven words, repeated over and over for 10 pages...

Revolutionary findings? Possibly fabricated.

Science isn't Broken.

Or maybe it is.

http://www.scivillage.com/thread-1290-po...ml#pid2839
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Science isn't "woke", but it is political C C 0 64 Oct 9, 2023 02:43 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Quest to eliminate vaccine mandates + EBM is broken but SBM can fix it C C 0 60 Aug 29, 2023 07:04 PM
Last Post: C C
  Funding isn't enough to fix science C C 0 119 May 30, 2021 02:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Behavioural despair tests get rethink + "Nutrition science is broken" C C 0 253 Jul 20, 2019 12:05 AM
Last Post: C C
  Daryl Bem proved ESP is real. Which means science is broken C C 1 515 Jun 14, 2017 05:13 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  The Broken Technology of Ghost Hunting C C 17 3,208 Nov 24, 2016 06:26 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)